Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:39:16.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conspecific interference by adults in an aphidophagous ladybird Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): effect on reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. Mishra  and
Omkar
G. Mishra
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
Omkar*
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of conspecific adult interference on the reproductive output of an aphidophagous ladybird, Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) were investigated. Ovipositing females were subjected to physical interference with conspecific adults (0 to 4 males or females) in Petri dishes and the effects on egg cannibalism, oviposition and egg viability were recorded. The absence of interference was related to the lowest egg cannibalism (0.00%) and higher fecundity (336.30±32.16 eggs) and egg viability (95.83±1.60%). Fecundity decreased with increasing physical interference from either sex. Egg viability declined with increasing male density, but was not influenced by conspecific females. In a second experiment, evaluating the role of conspecific adult chemical tracks on fecundity and egg viability, it was observed that adult chemical track density (fresh and ten-day-old) was negatively correlated. Egg viability was not affected by the presence of adult chemical tracks. The decrease in fecundity was not affected by the sex of the adults making the tracks, thus revealing that the chemical constitution of these deterrent compounds was not sex-specific. Conspecific interference in a Petri dish reduces reproductive output, as a result of physical interference and response to what seem to be oviposition-deterring pheromones present in adult tracks.

Keywords

coccinellidphysical interferencechemical interferencereproductionPropylea dissectaoviposition-deterring pheromonessemiochemicals
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 96 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 407 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwala, B.K. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1991) Cannibalism and interspecific predation in ladybirds. pp. 95–102 in Polgar, L., Chambers, R.J., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hodek, I. (Eds) Behaviour and impact of Aphidophaga. The Hague, SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Agarwala, B.K. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1993) Kin recognition: egg and larval cannibalism in Adalia bipunctata. European Journal of Entomology 90, 45–50.Google Scholar
Agarwala, B.K., Yasuda, H. & Kajita, Y. (2003) Effect of conspecific and heterospecific feces on foraging and oviposition of two predatory ladybirds: role of fecal cues in predator avoidance. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, A.F.G. (1997) Patch quality and fitness in predatory ladybirds. pp. 205–222 in Dettner, P. (Ed.) Vertical food web interactions. Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doumbia, M., Hemptinne, J.L. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1998) Assessment of patch quality by ladybeetles: role of larval tracks. Oecologia 113, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E.W. (1976) Mutual interference between predatory anthocorids. Ecological Entomology 1, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, T.W. (1959) Occurrence of spermatophore in certain species of Chilocorus. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 35, 205–208.Google Scholar
Fréchette, B., Alauzet, C. & Hemptinne, J.L. (2003) Oviposition behaviour of the two-spot ladybird beetle Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on plants with conspecific larval tracks. Arquipélago–Life and Marine Science, Supplement 5, 73–77.Google Scholar
Giga, D.P. & Canhao, J. (1997) Interspecies interference of oviposition behaviour in the cowpea weevils Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Insect Science and Its Application 17, 251–255.Google Scholar
Giga, D.P. & Smith, R.H. (1991) Comparative life-history studies of four Callosobruchus species with special reference to Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 19, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M.P. & Varley, G.C. (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223, 1133–1137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemptinne, J.L. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1991) Why ladybirds have generally been so ineffective in biological control. pp. 149–245 in Polgar, L., Chambers, R.J., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hodek, I. (Eds) Behaviour and impact of Aphidophaga. The Hague, SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2000) Defence, oviposition and sex: semiochemical parsimony in two species of ladybird beetles (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae)? A short review. European Journal of Entomology 97, 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L., Dixon, A.F.G. & Coffin, J. (1992) Attack strategy of ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae): factors shaping their numerical response. Oecologia 90, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemptinne, J.L., Dixon, A.F.G., Doucet, J.L. & Petersen, J.E. (1993) Optimal foraging by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) and ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): mechanisms. European Journal of Entomology 90, 451–455.Google Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L., Dixon, A.F.G. & Gauthier, C. (2000a) Nutritive cost of intraguild predation on eggs of Coccinella septempunctata and Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 97, 559–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L., Lognay, J., Gauthier, C. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2000b) Role of surface chemical signals in egg cannibalism and intraguild predation in ladybeetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 10, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L., Lognay, J., Doumbia, M. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2001) Chemical nature and persistence of the oviposition deterring pheromone in the tracks of the larvae of the two spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 11, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, H.B. (1972) Genetic evidence for fewer progeny and higher percent males when Nasonia vitripennis oviposits in previously parasitized hosts. Entomophaga 17, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D.J. (1966) Observations on the biology of Craphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), a parasitoid of the eggs of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society, London 118, 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R. (1990) Sex-ratio and reproductive success in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (Den. & Schiff.) (Lep., Noctuidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 109, 200–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaitre, D. (1992) Stimulation et regulation de la ponte de la coccinelle coccidiphage Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant. 70 pp. Thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Lucas, É., Coderre, D. & Brodeur, J. (1998) Intraguild predation among aphid predators: characterization and influence of extraguild prey density. Ecology 79, 1084–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minitab (2003) Minitab Statistical Software, Minitab Release 13.2, Minitab Inc.Google Scholar
Mondor, E.B. & Warren, J.L. (2000) Unconditioned and conditioned responses to colour in the predatory coccinellid, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 97, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obata, S. (1987) Mating behaviour and sperm transfer in the ladybird beetle, Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 22, 434–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, (2004) Reproductive behaviour of two aphidophagous ladybird beetles, Cheilomenes sexmaculata and Coccinella transversalis. Entomologia Sinica 11(2) 47–60.Google Scholar
Omkar, & Mishra, G. (2005) Preference-performance of a generalist predatory ladybird: a laboratory study. Biological Control 34, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, & Pervez, A. (2004) Functional and numerical responses of pale morph of Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) (Col., Coccinellidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 128, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, & Pervez, A. (2005) Mating behavior of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta (Mulsant). Insect Science 12, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, & Srivastava, S. (2002) The reproductive behaviour of an aphidophagous ladybeetle, Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus. European Journal of Entomology 99, 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, & Srivastava, S. (2003) Predation efficacy and searching efficiency of a ladybeetle, Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus in laboratory conditions. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 41, 82–84.Google Scholar
Omkar, , Mishra, G. & Pervez, A. (2002) Intraguild predation by ladybeetles: an ultimate survival strategy or an aid to advanced aphid biocontrol? Professor S.B. Singh Commemoration Volume of the Zoological Society of India, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
Omkar, , Singh, K. & Pervez, A. (2006) Influence of mating duration on fecundity and fertility in two aphidophagous ladybirds. Journal of Applied Entomology 130, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osawa, N. (1989) Sibling and non-sibling cannibalism by larvae of a lady beetle Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the field. Researches in Population Ecology 31, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osawa, N. (1993) Population field studies of the aphidophagous ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): life tables and key factor analysis. Researches in Population Ecology 35, 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pervez, A. & Omkar, (2003) Predation potential and handling time estimates of a generalist aphidophagous ladybird, Propylea dissecta. Biological Memoirs 29, 91–97.Google Scholar
Růžička, Z. (1994) Oviposition-deterring pheromone in Chrysopa oculata (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). European Journal of Entomology 91, 361–370.Google Scholar
Růžička, Z. (1996) Oviposition-deterring pheromone in chrysopids: intra- and interspecific effects. European Journal of Entomology 93, 161–166.Google Scholar
Růžička, Z. (1997a) Persistence of the oviposition-deterring pheromone in Chrysopa culata (Neur.: Chrysopidae). Entomophaga 42, 107–112.Google Scholar
Růžička, Z. (1997b) Recognition of oviposition-deterring allomones by aphidophagous predators (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 94, 431–434.Google Scholar
Shands, W.A., Simpson, G.W. & Brunson, M.H. (1970) Insect predators for controlling aphids on potatoes: I. In small plots with two kinds of barriers, in small fields or in charge cages. Journal of Economic Entomology 62, 514–518.Google Scholar
Takizawa, T., Yasuda, H. & Agarwal, B.K. (2000) Effects of parasitized aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) as food on larval performance of three predatory ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 35, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veeravel, R. & Baskaran, P. (1997) Functional and numerical responses of Coccinella transversalis Fab. and Cheilomenes sexmaculata Fab. feeding on the melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glov. Insect Science and Its Application 17, 335–339.Google Scholar
Viktorov, G.A. (1968) The influence of the population density upon the sex ratio in Trissolcus grandis Thoms. (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Zoologichesky Zhurnal 47, 1035–1039.Google Scholar
Wise, D.H. (1975) Food limitation of the spider Linyphia marginata: experimental field studies. Ecology 56, 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, H., Takagi, T. & Kogi, K. (2000) Effects of conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks on the oviposition behaviour of the predatory ladybird, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 97, 551–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar