Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:17:51.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative evaluation of Cotesia flavipes and C. sesamiae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for the management of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M.N. Sallam
Affiliation:
Bureau of Sugar Cane Experiment Stations (BSES), PO Box 566, Tully, Queensland, Australia
W.A. Overholt*
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
E. Kairu
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Kenyatta University, PO Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya
*
* Fax: 254 2 803360 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Cotesia flavipes Cameron, a gregarious larval endoparasitoid native to the Indo-Australian region, was imported from Pakistan and released in Kenya in 1993 for management of the exotic stemborer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). Recent reports confirmed the successful establishment of the parasitoid in three locations in Kenya and in northern Tanzania. Functional response studies on this parasitoid and an indigenous congener, Cotesia sesamiae (Cameron), indicated that C. flavipes had a higher searching ability and attacked more larvae when Chilo partellus was the host. When a native stemborer, Sesamia calamistis Hampson, was the host, there was no significant difference between numbers attacked by both parasitoids. Numerical response studies showed that Cotesia flavipes produced more total progeny and female progeny per female parasitoid on Chilo partellus than did Cotesia sesamiae. No significant difference in progeny production was detected between the two parasitoids on S. calamistis. Functional and numerical responses tested in the laboratory gave the same ranking of the two parasitoids on the two hosts as in the field. This study suggests that Cotesia flavipes is a more efficient parasitoid and it is anticipated that it will contribute to the control of both exotic and native stemborers in Kenya.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Van Alebeek, F.A.N.. (1996) Foraging behaviour of the egg parasitoid Uscana lariophaga: towards biological control of bruchid pests in stored cowpea in West Africa. PhD thesis, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen.Google Scholar
Bonhof, M.J., Overholt, W.A., van Huis, A. & Polaszek, A. (1997) Natural enemies of cereal stemborers in East Africa: a review. Insect Science and its Application 17, 1936.Google Scholar
Bosque-Perez, N.A. & Dabrowski, Z.T. (1989) Mass rearing of the maize stem borers Sesamia calamistis and Eldana saccharina at IITA. pp. 2226 in Toward insect resistant maize for the Third World. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Methodologies for Developing Host Plant Resistance to Maize Insects. Mexico, D.F., International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT).Google Scholar
Fernando, M.H.J.P. & Hassell, M.P. (1980) Predator–prey responses in an acarine system. Research in Population Ecology 22, 301322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinn, P.W. (1991) Temperature-dependent functional response of the parasitoid Cephalonomia waterstoni (Gahan) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) attacking rusty grain beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Cucujidae). Environmental Entomology 20, 872876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hokkanen, H.M. & Pimentel, D. (1989) New associations in biological control: theory and practice. Canadian Entomologist 121, 829840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, K.R. & King, E.G. (1986) Linear functional response of Microplitis croceipes (Hymemoptera: Braconidae) to variation in Heliothis spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) density in the field. Environmental Entomology 15, 476480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R.D., Woolcock, L.T. & Hughes, M.A. (1992) Laboratory evaluation of parasitic Hymenoptera used in attempts to biologically control aphid pests of crops in Australia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 63, 177185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, W.R. (1958) The lepidopterous stalk-borers associated with Gramineae in Uganda. Bulletin of Entomological Research 49, 367383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kareiva, P. (1990) The spatial dimension in pest–enemy interaction. pp. 213227in Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E. & Roland, J. (Eds) Critical issues in biological control.Google Scholar
Kfir, R. (1992) Seasonal abundance of the stem borer Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its parasites on summer grain crops. Journal of Economic Entomology 85, 518529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, N.A. & Jervis, M.A. (1996) Population dynamics. pp. 293374in Jervis, M. & Kidd, N. (Eds) Insect natural enemies. London, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathez, F.C. (1972) Chilo partellus Swinh., C. orichalcociliella Strand (Lep., Crambidae), and Sesamia calamistis Hamps. (Lep., Noctuidae) on maize in the coast province, Kenya. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 45, 267289.Google Scholar
May, R.M. & Hassell, M.P. (1988) Population dynamics and biological control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 318, 129169.Google Scholar
Mbapila, J.C. (1996) Comparative seasonal adaptation of Cotesia flavipes Cameron and Cotesia sesamiae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Chilo partellus Swinhoe (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on the Kenya coast. PhD thesis, University of Dar-Es-Salaam.Google Scholar
Mbapila, J.C. & Overholt, W.A. (1997) Oviposition, development and searching behaviour of Cotesia flavipes Cameron and Cotesia sesamiae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in relation to aestivating and non-aestivating Chilo spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae in maize. African Entomology 5, 3539.Google Scholar
Mills, N.J. & Getz, W.M. (1996) Modelling the biological control of insect pests: a review of host-parasitoid models. Ecological Modelling 92, 121143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohyuddin, A.I. (1971) Comparative biology and ecology of Apanteles flavipes and A. sesamiae Cam. as parasites of graminaceous borers. Bulletin of Entomological Research 61, 3339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohyuddin, A.I. & Greathead, D.J. (1970) An annotated list of the parasites of graminaceous stem borers in East Africa, with a discussion of their potential in biological control. Entomophaga 15, 241274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D.C. & Peck, E.A. (1982) Introduction to linear regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ngi-Song, A.J., Overholt, W.A. & Ayertey, J.N. (1995) Host suitability of African graminaceous stemborers for the development of Cotesia flavipes and Cotesia sesamiae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environmental Entomology 24, 978984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngi-Song, A.J., Overholt, W.A., Njagi, P.G.N., Dicke, M., Ayertey, J.N. & Lwande, W. (1996) volatile infochemicals used in host and host habitat location by Cotesia flavipes Cameron and Cotesia sesamiae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), larval parasitoids of stemborers on Gramineae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 307323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, I.W.B. (1960) The insect pest of graminaceous crops in East Africa. Colon. Research study number 31. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Ochieng, R.S., Onyango, F.O. & Bungu, M.D.O. (1985) Improvement of techniques for mass-culture of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). Insect Science and its Application 6, 425428.Google Scholar
Oloo, G.W. & Ogeda, K. (1990) The incidence of Chilo partellus (Swinh.) (Pyralidae) and the contribution of natural enemies to its mortality under intercropping system in Kenya. Tropical Pest Management 36, 244248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, R. (1989) The functional response and the theory of biological control. pp. 8397in Baker, R. & Dunn, P. (Eds) New directions in biological control. New York, Alan Liss.Google Scholar
Overholt, W.A. (1993) Laboratory rearing procedure for Cotesia flavipes. pp. 2933in Overholt, W.A. (Ed.) Proceedings, Group Training Course on Identification of Cotesia spp. Stemborer Parasitoids. ICIPE Science, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Overholt, W.A. & Smith, J.W. Jr (1990) Comparative evaluation of three exotic insect parasites (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) against the south western corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in corn. Environmental Entomology 19, 11551162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overholt, W.A., Ngi-Song, A.J., Kimani, S.K., Mbapila, J.C., Lammers, P.M. & Kioko, E.N. (1994) Ecological considerations of the introduction of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for biological control of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in Africa. Biocontrol News and Information 15, 1924.Google Scholar
Overholt, W.A., Ngi-Song, A.J., Omwega, C.O., Kimani-Njogu, S.W., Mbapila, J., Sallam, M.N. & Ofomata, V.C. (1997) A review of the introduction and establishment of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in East Africa for biological control of cereal stemborers. Insect Science and its Application 17, 7995.Google Scholar
Potting, R.P.J., Overholt, W.A., Danso, F.O. & Takasu, K. (1997) Foraging behavior and life history of the stemborer parasitoid Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 10, 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1988) Users’ guide: Statistics, release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Varley, G.C. & Gradwell, G.R. (1969) The use of models and life tables in assessing the role of natural enemies. pp. 93112 in Biological control. Proceedings of an AAAs symposium on Biological control, Boston, Massachusetts. December 30–31.Google Scholar
Wiedenmann, R.N. & Smith, J.W. Jr. (1993) Functional response of the parasite Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) at low densities of the host Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environmental Entomology 22, 849859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedenmann, R.N. & Smith, J.W. Jr (1995) Parasitisation of Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by Cotesia chilonis and Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environmental Entomology 24, 950961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar