Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:40:15.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacterial odours as oviposition stimulants for Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), the Australian sheep blowfly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. L. Emmens  and
M. D. Murray
R. L. Emmens
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia.
M. D. Murray
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Health, McMaster Laboratory, Private Bag No. 1, P.O. Glebe, N.S.W. 2037, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extracts from unsterile sheep fleeces seeded with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae or Bacillus subtilis equally stimulated oviposition by females of Lucilia cuprina (Wied.). However, with increasing length of incubation, significant differences emerged, the cultures of P. mirabilis, E. cloacae and B. subtilis becoming contaminated with increasing numbers of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the responses of the flies to the culture extracts becoming greater. The maximum number of eggs was laid over four–g day–old cultures. The response was highly significant for Proteus mirabilis and E. cloacae but not significant for B. subtilis. Although contamination with Pseudomonas aeruginosa appeared to be the cause of the increased oviposition, pure P. aeruginosa cultures did not elicit high responses. The response to cultures of P. aeruginosa was apparently enhanced by interactions with other bacteria.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 411 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eddy, G. W., DeVaney, J. A. & Handke, B. D. (1975). Response of the adult screwworm (Diptera: Calliphoridae) to bacteria–inoculated and incubated bovine blood in olfactometer and ovi– tests. — J. med. Entomol. 12, 379–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmens, R. L. (1981). Evidence for an attractant in cuticular lipids of female Lucilia cuprina (Wied.), Australian sheep blowfly. — J. Chem. Ecol. 7, 529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmens, R. L. & Murray, M. D. (1982). The role of bacterial odours in oviposition by Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), the Australian sheep blowfly. — Bull. ent. Res. 72, 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, G. G. (1970). The use of non–parametric methods in the statistical analysis of a complex split plot experiment. — Biometrics 26, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, G. C. & Watts, J. E. (1978). An in–vitro technique for studying fleece–rot and fly strike in sheep. — Aust. vet. J. 54, 513–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulcock, A. P. (1966). The survival of micro-organisms in fleece wool. — N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 9, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoental, R. (1941). The nature of the antibacterial agents present in Pseudomonas pyocynea cultures — Br. J. exp. Path. 22, 137.Google Scholar
Seddon, H. R. (1931). Conditions which predispose sheep to blowfly attack. — Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 42, 581–594.Google Scholar
Van Tonder, E. M., Kellerman, G. E. & Bolton, T. F. W. (1976). Discolouration of wool: 1 green discolouration. — Jl S. Afr. vet. Ass. 47, 223.Google ScholarPubMed