Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:58:01.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of the economic importance of the tsetse species of southern Nigeria and the Southern Cameroons based on their trypanosome infection rates and ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. M. Jordan
A. M. Jordan
Affiliation:
West African Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, Kaduna, N. Nigeria.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Previous records and new data on infection rates in species of Glossina inhabiting southern Nigeria and the Southern Cameroons are presented, and the probable economic importance of each species is assessed.

The trypanosome infection rates were highest in those species of tsetse which fed largely on Bovidae.

The rarity of human trypanosomiasis in southern Nigeria and the Southern Cameroons is attributed largely to impersonal man/fly contact; under such conditions a low proportion of infected flies is to be expected. G. palpalis (R.-D.) is not an important vector of sleeping sickness, as it is in northern Nigeria. The incidence of infection in G. palpalis was generally very low; cases of bovine trypanosomiasis do occur in areas where G. palpalis is the only tsetse species present, but it is not considered to be an important vector.

Little information is available on G. tachinoides Westw. and G. caliginea Aust. in southern Nigeria; both have probably been at least partly responsible for some of the rare outbreaks of sleeping sickness reported from the south. G. tachinoides may be of some significance as a vector of animal trypanosomiasis.

The infection rate in G. longipalpis Wied. at the West African Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research Field Station at Ugbobigha was 21·5 per cent.; this species is believed to be of major economic importance because its presence must prevent the keeping of cattle in large areas of potential grazing.

At least 13 per cent, of examples of G. medicorum Aust., G. fusca (Wlk.) and G. nigrofusca Newst. were infected in the populations examined, and the first two species are considered to be of economic importance because they penetrate potential grazing areas.

G. pallicera Big., G. tabaniformis Westw. and G. haningtoni Newst. are confined to rain-forest and were found to be lightly infected; they are therefore not considered to be of economic importance, except possibly as a source of infection to cattle on trade routes.

No data are available for G. nashi Potts.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , October 1961 , pp. 431 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashcroft, M. T. (1959). The importance of African wild animals as reservoirs of trypanosomiasis.—E. Afr. med. J. 36 pp. 289–297.Google ScholarPubMed
Ashcroft, M. T., Burtt, E. & Fairbairn, H. (1959). The experimental infection of some African wild animals with Trypanosoma rhodesiense, T. brucci and T. congolense.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 53 pp. 147–161.Google Scholar
Fontoura de Sequeira, L. A. (1935). Rapport de la Mission Médicale à la Colonie de Guinée en 1932.—86 pp. Lisbon, Ecole Méd. trop.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. M., Lee-Jones, F. & Weitz, B. (1961). The natural hosts of tsetse flies in the forest belt of Nigeria and the Southern Cameroons.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 55 pp. 167–179.Google Scholar
Keay, R. W. J. (1953). An outline of Nigerian vegetation.—2nd edn., 55 pp. Lagos, Govt. Printer.Google Scholar
Macfie, J. W. S. & Gallagher, G. H. (1914). Sleeping sickness in the Eket district of Nigeria.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 8 pp. 379–427.Google Scholar
McLetchie, J. L. (1948). The control of sleeping sickness in Nigeria.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 41 pp. 445–470.Google Scholar
Morris, K. R. S. (1934). The bionomics and importance of Glossina longipalpis, Wied., in the Gold Coast.—Bull. ent. Res. 25 pp. 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1944). A low density of tsetse flies associated with a high incidence of sleeping sickness.—Bull. ent. Res. 35 p. 51.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1948). Tsetse flies in British West Africa.—77 pp. London, Colon. Off., H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1952). Some observations on resting tsetse-fly populations, and evidence that Glossina medicorum is a carrier of trypanosomes.—Bull. ent. Res. 43 pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1960). A review of the African trypanosomiasis problem.—Trop. Dis. Bull. 57 pp. 973–1003.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. & Page, W. A. (1953). The ecology of Glossina palpalis in northern Nigeria.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 104 pp. 71–169.Google Scholar
Page, W. A. (1959 a). The ecology of Glossina longipalpis Wied. in southern Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, W. A. (1959 b). The ecology of Glossina palpalis (R.-D.) in southern Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 617–631.Google Scholar
Page, W. A. (1959 c). Some observations on the fusca group of tsetse flies (Glossina) in the south of Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 633–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, W. A. & McDonald, W. A. (1959). An assessment of the degree of man-fly contact exhibited by Glossina palpalis at water-holes in northern and southern Nigeria.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 53 pp. 162–165.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E., Maillot, L. & Rageau, J. (1951). Infection naturelle de Glossina caliginea Austen dans les gîtes à palétuviers de Daoula (Cameroun français).—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 44 pp. 309–313.Google Scholar