Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:34:57.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of some methods for the bioassay of changes in cattle dung as insect food, using the bush fly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. N. Matthiessen ,
L. Haylesa  and
M. J. Palmer
J. N. Matthiessen
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Private Bag, P.O. Wembley, Western Australia, 6014.
L. Haylesa
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Private Bag, P.O. Wembley, Western Australia, 6014.
M. J. Palmer
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Mathematics and Statistics, Private Bag, P.O. Wembley, Western Australia, 6014.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several methods for the bioassay of changes in cattle dung as insect food were defined and simultaneously assessed using Musca vetustissima Wlk. Size of emerging adults, in particular head width, was a reliable estimator of changes in the dung, but survival was not. Freezing of dung for 24 h had no effect. Flies of similar size emerged from dung placed on moist sand (field capacity moisture) and on an impermeable membrane; on dry sand, size was greatly reduced when the dung was coarse and less nutritious. The optimal method was deemed to be use of fresh dung on sand at field capacity moisture, leaving flies to emerge and die before measuring the head widths in a sample.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 463 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greenham, P. M. (1972). The effects of the variability of cattle dung on the multiplication of the bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walk.).—J. Anim. Ecol. 41, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D., Greenham, P. M., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Walker, J. M. (1972). A synopsis of observations on the biology of the Australian bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walker).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 11, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. & Sands, P. (1979). Modelling bushfly populations.—J. appl. Ecol. 16, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, J. N. & Hayles, L. (1983). Seasonal changes in characteristics of cattle dung as a resource for an insect in southwestern Australia.—Aust. J. Ecol. 8, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P. & Hughes, R. D. (1976). A simulation model of seasonal changes in the value of cattle dung as a food resource for an insect.—Agric. Meteorol. 17, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar