Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:58:19.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A vision of dairy production in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

C. H. Knight
C. H. Knight*
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL , UK
Get access

Abstract

This review considers the likely impact of changing consumer requirements, political pressure, economics and technological advances on the dairy production industry of the future. The vision is one of diverse strategies of production, the majority of milk being produced from cows managed technologically with much greater regard for welfare, with a number of ‘romantic’ strategies such as organic, extensive or dual-purpose production supplying niche markets. The important novel feature of the technological strategy will be an escape from the intensive twelve-month lactation cycle to extended lactations of, say, eighteen months, since this will reduce the number of times the cow is exposed to metabolic and other stresses associated with parturition, peak lactation and rebreeding.

Type
Offered Papers
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 28: Integrated management systems for livestock , 2001 , pp. 51 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczewski, J.Z., Fargey, P.J., Laarveld, B., Gunn, A. and Flood, P.F. 1998. The influence of fatness on the likelihood of early-winter pregnancy in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Theriogenology 50: 605–614.Google Scholar
Agnew, R.E., Agnew, K.W. and Feardon, A. M. 2000. Milk composition. British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publication 25Google Scholar
Arbel, R., Bigun, Y., Ezra, E., Sturman, H. and Hojman, D. 2001. The effect of extended calving intervals in high-yielding lactating cows on milk production and profitability. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 600–608.Google Scholar
Banks, W., Clapperton, J.L., Muir, D.D. and Girdler, A.K. 1989. Whipping properties of cream in relation to milk composition. Journal of Dairy Research 56: 97–105.Google Scholar
Bauman, D.E. 1992. Bovine somatotrophin: review of an emerging animal technology. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 3432–3451.Google Scholar
Bennett, C.N., Knight, C.H. and Wilde, C.J. 1990. Regulation of mammary prolactin binding by secreted milk proteins. Journal of Endocrinology 127 (Suppl.): 141.Google Scholar
Bertilsson, J., Berglund, B., Osterman, S., Rehn, H. and Tengroth, G. 1998. Extended calving intervals - a way to optimise future milk production? 1. Effects on productivity. Book of Abstracts of the 49th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production Warsaw 170Google Scholar
Carruthers, V.R., Davis, S.R., Bryant, A.M., Henderson, H.V., Morris, C.A. and Copeman, P.J. A. 1993. Response of Jersey and Friesian cows to once a day milking and prediction of response based on udder characteristics and milk composition. Journal of Dairy Research 60: 1–11.Google Scholar
Cumby, T.R. and Phillips, V.R. 2001. Environmental impacts of livestock production. This volume Google Scholar
Davis, S.R. 1998. Once-daily milking of dairy cows: an appraisal. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Producytion 58: 1–4.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, R., Rutter, S.M. and Rook, A.J. 2001. Nutritional and grazing management of the dairy cow. This volume. Google Scholar
Erb, H.N., Smith, R.D., Hillman, R. B., Powers, P.A., Smith, M.C., White, M.E. and Pearson, E.G. 1984. Rates of diagnosis of six diseases of Holstein cows during 15-day and 21-day intervals. American Journal of Veterinary Research 45: 333–335.Google Scholar
Esslemont, D. and Kossaibati, M.A. 2000. Dairy farming systems: husbandry, economics and recording. In: AH, Andrews (ed) The health of dairy cattle. Blackwell Science, Oxford: pp299–327 Google Scholar
FAWC 1997. Report on the Welfare of Dairy Cattle. FAWC, Surbiton, Surrey.Google Scholar
Flint, D.J. and Knight, C.H. 1997. Interactions of prolactin and growth hormone (GH) in the regulation of mammary gland function and epithelial cell survival. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 2: 41–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, A.R. 2001. An overview of integrated management systems for sustainable livestock production. This volume. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, D. and Lormore, L. 2000. Economics of atypical milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 83 suppl 1: 24.Google Scholar
Grohn, Y., Saloniemi, H. and Syvajarvi, J. 1986. An epidemiological and genetic study on registered diseases in Finnish Ayrshire cattle: I. The data, disease occurrence and culling. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 27: 182–195.Google Scholar
Hillerton, J.E. and Semmens, J.E. 1999. Comparison of treatment of mastitis by oxytocin or antibiotics following detection according to changes in milk electrical conductivity prior to visible signs. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 93–98.Google Scholar
Ingvartsen, K.L. and Andersen, J.B. 2000. Integration of metabolism and intake regulation: a review focusing on periparturient animals. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1573–1597.Google Scholar
Knight, C.H. and Wilde, C.J. 1987. Mammary growth during lactation: implications for increasing milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 1991–2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, C.H., Fowler, P.A. and Wilde, C. J. 1990. Galactopoietic and mammogenic effects of long-term treatment with bovine growth hormone and thrice daily milking in goats. Journal of Endocrinology 127: 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, C.H. and Dewhurst, R.D. 1994. Once daily milking of dairy cows; relationship between yield loss and mammary cistern capacity. Journal of Dairy Research 61: 441–449.Google Scholar
Knight, C.H. and Mainland, D. 1995. Physiology of milk production; how can it be manipulated. Cattle Practice 3: 169–173.Google Scholar
Knight, C.H., Beever, D.E. and Sorensen, A. 1999a. Metabolic loads to be expected from different genotypes under different systems. British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publication 24: 27–35.Google Scholar
Knight, C.H., Fitzpatrick, J.L., Logue, D.N. and Platt, D.J. 1999b. Efficacy of two non-antibiotic therapies, oxytocin and topical liniment, against bovine staphylococcal mastitis. Veterinary Record 146: 311–316.Google Scholar
Knight, C.H. and Sorensen, A. 2000. Manipulation of lactation persistency with maintenance of milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science 83 suppl 1: 24.Google Scholar
Knight, C.H., Sorensen, A. and Muir, D. 2000. Non-nutritional (novel) techniques for manipulation of milk composition. British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publication 25: 223–239.Google Scholar
Knight, C.H. 2001. Lactation and gestation in dairy cows: flexibility avoids nutritional extremes. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, D.N., Berry, R.J., Offer, J.E., Chaplin, S.J., Crawshaw, W.M., Leach, K.A., Ball, P.J.H. and Bax, J. 1999. Consequences of metabolic load for lameness and disease. British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publication 24: 83–98.Google Scholar
Loudon, A.S.I. and Kay, R.N. B. 1984. Lactational constraints on a seasonally breeding mammal: the red deer. Symposia of the zoological Society of London 51: 233–252.Google Scholar
Lucey, J. 1996. Cheesemaking from grass based seasonal milk and problems associated with late-lactation milk. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 49: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margerison, J.K. and Phillips, C.J.C. 2000. The effect of suckling following mechanical milking on milk yield, milk composition and somatic cell count in dairy cattle. British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publication 25: 175–177.Google Scholar
McFadden, T.B. 1997. Prospects for improving lactation persistency. In: Welch, RAS, Burns, DJW, Davis, SR, Popay, AI, Prosser, CG (eds) Milk composition, production and biotechnology. CAB International: pp319–339 Google Scholar
Millar, K. amd Mepham, T.B. 2001. Bioethical analysis of new engineering and biological technologies: lessons from automatic milking systems AMS and bovine somatotrophin BST. This volume. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mottram, T.T. and Masson, L. 2001. Intelligent machines and dumb animals: milking and monitoring the dairy cow. This volume. Google Scholar
Palmer, M. 2001. The future for the livestock industry after foot and mouth. This volume Google Scholar
Pryce, J.E., Veerkamp, R.F., Thompson, R., Hill, W.G. and Simm, G. 1997. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 65: 353–360.Google Scholar
Ratnayake, D.R.T.G., Berglund, B., Bertilsson, J., Forsberg, M. and Gustafsson, H. 1998. Fertility in cows managed for calving intervals of 12, 15 or 18 months. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 39: 215–228.Google Scholar
Sorensen, A. 2000. Manipulation of lactation persistency to achieve extended lactation in dairy cows. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow: 226pGoogle Scholar
Van Amburgh, M., Galton, D., Bauman, D. and Everett, R.W. 1997. Management and economics of extended calving intervals with use of BST. Livestock Production Science 50: 15–28.Google Scholar
Vargas, B., Koops, W.J., Herrero, S. and Van Arendonk, J.A.M. 2000. Modeling extended lactations of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1371–1380.Google Scholar
Weller, R.F. and Bowling, P.J. 2000. Veterinary Record 146: 80–81.Google Scholar
Weller, R.F. 1996. Organic dairy farming. In: Phillips, CJC (ed) Progress in Dairy Science. CAB International, Oxford: pp335–354 Google Scholar
Wilde, C.J., Addey, C.V.P., Li, P. and Fernig, D.G. 1997. Programmed cell death in bovine mammary tissue during lactation and involution. Experimental Physiology 82: 943–953.Google Scholar