No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The responses of silage-fed Scottish Blackface lambs to increasing levels of fish meal supplementation with or without additional barley
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

- Type
- Poster Abstracts
- Information
- BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 14: New Developments in Sheep Production , January 1990 , pp. 157 - 161
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1990
References
REFERENCES
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. 1983. Growth and development of lambs. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 21–58. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, S. 1983. Effect of type of roughage and barley supplementation on the performance of store lambs. Animal Production Research Report, pp. 75. An Forus Talúntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. J. 1986. Finishing of store lambs on silage-based diets. 3. Effects of formic acid with or without formaldehyde as silage additives and barley supplementation on silage intake and lamb performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 25: 363–377.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. J. 1987. Finishing store lambs on silage-based diets. 4. Effects of stage of grass growth when ensiled and barley supplementation on silage intake and lamb performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 139–151.Google Scholar
Gill, M. and Ulyatt, M. J. 1977. The effect of supplementation with protein, energy and Lmethionine on the digestion of silage by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, S. A. and Bryant, M. J. 1986. The response of store lambs to dietary supplements of fish meal. 2. Effects of level of feeding. Animal Production 42: 233–240.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. J. and Mansbridge, R. J. 1986. The effect of supplementing silage with fish meal for finishing store lambs. Animal Production 42: 454 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kelly, N. C. and Thomas, P. C. 1978. The nutritive value of silages. Energy metabolism of sheep receiving diets of grass silage or grass silage and barley. British Journal of Nutrition 40: 205–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. 1987. Early weaning and fattening of lambs. In New Techniques in Sheep Production (ed. Marai, I. F. M. and Owen, J. B.), pp. 189–195. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povey, G. M., Webster, G. M. and Weekes, T. E. C. 1989. The response of silage-fed Scottish Blackface lambs to different levels of energy and protein supplementation with or without a store period. Animal Production 48: 645 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Reed, K. F. M. 1979. A note on the feeding value of grass and grass/clover silages for store lambs. Animal Production 28: 271–274.Google Scholar
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc. 1986. SPSSx User's Guide, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stone, C. and Appleton, M. 1984. The effect of silage dry matter concentration and protein supplementation on the intake and performance of housed store lambs. Animal Production 38: 522 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Tayer, S. R. and Bryant, M. J. 1988. The response of store lambs to dietary supplements of fish meal. 3. Effects of the preceding pattern of growth. Animal Production 47: 393–399.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Kelly, N. C., Chamberlain, D. G. and Wait, M. K. 1980. The nutritive value of silages. Digestion of organic matter, gross energy and carbohydrate constituents in the rumen and intestines of sheep receiving diets of grass silage or grass and barley. British Journal of Nutrition 43: 481–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilala, K. and Bryant, M. J. 1985. The effects upon the intake and performance of store lambs of supplementing grass silage with barley, fish meal and rapeseed meal. Animal Production 40: 111–121.Google Scholar