Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:28:52.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equine behavioural science: perspectives on problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

H. Randle
H. Randle*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drakes Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, [email protected]
Get access

Extract

It is crucial to emphasise the importance of a sound scientific underpinning in the tackling of equine problems and regulation of those who treat equines. It is becoming increasingly common for two types of ‘practitioner’ to be consulted by owners of horses experiencing some kind of behavioural problem, namely Horse Whisperers (HWs) and Horse Behaviour Advisors (HBAs).

Throughout this paper HWs are considered to be those who can ‘communicate with an equine, in a para–normal, gifted manner’, whilst HBAs are considered to be those who ‘advise on horse behaviour, especially problem behaviour’. The commonly used term ‘Horse Behaviourist’ has deliberately not been used as it is technically incorrect. Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of psychology and learning theory will know that behaviourists are proponents of ‘behaviourism’ – a particular way of explaining learning. It is not a generic term referring to the study of animal behaviour – that is ‘ethology’. Worryingly today the term ‘ethology’ is being employed as a marketing tool.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 35: Applying Equine Science: Research into Business , 2006 , pp. 109 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyerstein, B. L., 1997. Why bogus therapies seem to work. Skeptical Enquirer September/October.Google Scholar
Evans, N., 1996. The horse whisperer. Corgi, London.Google Scholar
Farmer–Dougan, V.A. and Dougan, J. D., 1999. The man who listens to horses. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behaviour 72: 139–149.Google Scholar
Fontanarosa, P. B., and Lundberg, G. D., 1998. Alternative medicine meets science. Journal of American Medical Association. 280: 1618–1619.Google Scholar
Irwin, C., 2001. Horses don't lie : what horses teach us about our natural capacity for awareness, confidence, courage and trust. Souvenir Press, London.Google Scholar
Jonas, W. B., 1998. Alternative medicine–learning from the past, examining the present, advancing to the future. Journal of American Medical Association 280: 1616–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiley–Worthington, M. 1987. Horse behaviour: in relation to management and training. J.A. Allen, London.Google Scholar
Kiley–Worthington, M. 2005. Horse watch: what it is to be equine. J.A. Allen, London.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. N., 1992. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Smith, S. and Goldman, L., 1999. Colour discrimination in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62:13–25.Google Scholar
Waran, N. 2005. Equestrianism and horse welfare. The need for an ‘equine–centred’ approach to training. Proceedings of the 1st International Equitation Science Symposium, Australian Equine Behaviour Centre, Clonbinane, Victoria. Post Graduate Foundation in Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, 67–74.Google Scholar