Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T15:51:56.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dietary choices assessed by pre- and post-grazing tests on rangeland vegetation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

G. Molénat ,
D. Hubert ,
P. Lapeyronie ,
J. Gouy  and
T. Adama
G. Molénat
Affiliation:
ENSA/INRA, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, Cedex 1, France
D. Hubert
Affiliation:
ENSA/INRA, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, Cedex 1, France
P. Lapeyronie
Affiliation:
ENSA/INRA, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, Cedex 1, France
J. Gouy
Affiliation:
ENSA/INRA, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, Cedex 1, France
T. Adama
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65, Minna, Nigeria
Get access

Extract

Dietary choices of herbivores on rangeland complex vegetation are not easy to assess and give more or less biased results despite dedicated work (Holecheck et al., 1982; McInnis et al., 1983). Direct methods, such as oesophageal fistulas and direct observations can only be used in a limited range of conditions. Their negative effect on animal welfare emphasizes the need for non-injurious and nonstressful methods.

Type
Poster abstracts
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 20: Animal Choices , 1997 , pp. 90 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Daget, P. and Poissonet, J. 1971. Une méthode d’analyse phytologique des prairies — criteres d’application. Annales Agronomiques 22: 5–41.Google Scholar
Heady, H. F. 1957. The measurement and value of plant height in the study of herbaceous vegetation. Ecology 38: 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holecheck, J. L., Vavra, M. and Pieper, R. D. 1982. Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review. Journal of Range Management 35: 306–309.Google Scholar
Levy, E. B. and Madden, E. A. 1933. The point method for pasture analysis. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 46: 267–275.Google Scholar
McInnis, M. L., Vavra, M. and Krueger W. C., 1983. A comparison of four methods used to determine the diets of large herbivores. Journal of Range Management 36: 302–306.Google Scholar
Pluvinage, J. and Molenat, G. 1993. Un système pastoral articule sur l’agriculture. L’élevage ovin en Crau. Proceedings of the fourth international rangeland congress vol. 2, pp. 826–828.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 6.03 edition. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar