Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T00:28:27.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of the gas production technique to investigate responses of supplementing low quality forages. 2. In vivo interactions and comparison with in vitro parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A. H. Murray ,
A. Moss ,
C. D. Wood ,
D. I. Givens  and
M. Gill
A. H. Murray
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB
A. Moss
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB
C. D. Wood
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB
D. I. Givens
Affiliation:
ADAS, Feed Evaluation and Nutrition Sciences, Dairy Research Centre, Alcester Road, Stratford-upon-Avon CV37 9RQ
M. Gill
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB
Get access

Extract

Ruminants in many less developed countries may consume poor quality roughages such as straws, stovers and senescent native pasture as a major part of their diet, particularly during the dry season when high-quality forages are in short supply. The majority of these roughages are high in fibre, low in protein and the intake of digestible nutrients often is not enough to meet maintenance requirements. Intake and digestibility of poor-quality roughages may be increased by supplementation. The response to supplementation can be attributed to an increase in the supply of nitrogen and/or readily fermentable carbohydrate, resulting in an increase in rumen cellulolytic micro-organisms and therefore enhanced fibre degradation.

Type
Posters
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 22: In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants , 1998 , pp. 266 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, D. R. and Isaac, D. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology 163: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D. and Schneider, W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro . Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romney, D. L., Cadario, F. C. Owen, E. and Murray, A. H. 1997 Comparison of parameters from the Theodorou gas production technique using nitrogen-free and nitrogen-rich media as predictors of dry-matter intake and digestibility. In In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants (ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T., Rymer, C., Huntington, J. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 172–174. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 22. Google Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Williams, B. A., Dhaona, M. S., McAllan, A. M. and France, J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science 48: 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C. D., Murray, A. H., Moss, A. R. and Givens, D. I. 1998. Use of the gas production technique to investigate the response of supplementing low quality forages. 1. In vitro interactions . In In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants (ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T., Rymer, C., Huntington, J. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 92–94. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 22.Google Scholar