Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T22:38:33.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Do Private Actors Engage in Censorship? Evidence From a Correspondence Experiment with Russian Private Media Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2021

Quintin H. Beazer ,
Charles D. Crabtree Open the ORCID record for Charles D. Crabtree [Opens in a new window] ,
Christopher J. Fariss  and
Holger L. Kern
Quintin H. Beazer
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Charles D. Crabtree*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Christopher J. Fariss
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Holger L. Kern
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In authoritarian regimes, repression encourages private actors to censor not only themselves, but also other private actors—a behavior we call “regime-induced private censorship.” We present the results of a correspondence experiment conducted in Russia that investigates the censorship behavior of private media firms. We find that such firms censor third-party advertisements that include anti-regime language, calls for political or non-political collective action, or both. Our results demonstrate the significance of other types of censorship besides state censorship in an important authoritarian regime and contribute to the rapidly growing literature on authoritarian information control.

Keywords

information manipulationcensorshipRussiaauthoritarian regimes
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 1790 - 1809
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beazer, QH et al. (2021) Replication Data for: When do private actors engage in censorship? Evidence from a correspondence experiment with Russian private media firms, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WAEFB1, Harvard Dataverse, V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M and Duflo, E (2016) Field experiments on discrimination. NBER working paper, https://www.nber.org/papers/w22014. Last accessed on September 2, 2021.Google Scholar
Chen, J, Pan, J, and Xu, Y (2016) Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: a field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science 60(2), 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwe, M (2001) Rational Ritual. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, C (1995) Multi-dimensional threat perception and regime repression: an inquiry into why regimes apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science 39(3), 683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, MK (2014) What the party wanted to know: citizen complaints as a “barometer of public opinion” in communist Bulgaria. East European Politics & Societies 28(2), 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distelhorst, G and Hue, Y (2014) Ingroup bias in official behavior: a national field experiment in China. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9(2), 203–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egorov, G, Guriev, S, and Sonin, K (2009) Why resource-poor dictators allow freer media: a theory and evidence from panel data. American Political Science Review 103(4), 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enikolopov, R, Petrova, M, and Zhuravskaya, E (2011) Media and political persuasion: evidence from Russia. American Economic Review 101(7), 3253–3285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esberg, J (2020) Censorship as reward: evidence from pop culture censorship in Chile. American Political Science Review 114(3), 821–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, M (2008) Burning Books. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, CJ and Brzezinski, Z (1965) Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, G (2015) Building an Authoritarian Polity: Russia in Post-Soviet Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueorguiev, DD and Malesky, EJ (2019) Consultation and selective censorship in China. Journal of Politics 81(4), 1539–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guriev, S and Treisman, D (2019) Informational autocrats. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(4), 100–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guriev, S and Treisman, D (2020) A theory of informational autocracy. Journal of Public Economics 186, 104–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, J (1970) Die Presselenkung im Dritten Reich. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Huang, H (2015) Propaganda as signaling. Comparative Politics 47(4), 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, H (2017) A war of (mis)information: the political effects of rumors and rumor rebuttals in an authoritarian country. British Journal of Political Science 47(2), 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, GW and Rubin, DB (2015) Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J and Yang, DL (2016) Lying or believing? Measuring preference falsification from a political purge in China. Comparative Political Studies 49(5), 600–634.Google Scholar
Kalathil, S and Boas, TC (2003) Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Keck, M and Sikkink, K (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, HL and Hainmueller, J (2009) Opium for the masses: how foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis 17(4), 377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G, Pan, J, and Roberts, ME (2013) How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review 107(2), 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, T (1991) Now out of never: the element of surprise in the East European revolution of 1989. World Politics 44(1), 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S and Way, LA (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewy, G (2016) Harmful and Undesirable: Book Censorship in Nazi Germany. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Link, P (2002) China: the anaconda in the chandelier. The New York Review of Books, April 11.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, P (2014) China's strategic censorship. American Journal of Political Science 58(2), 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, E and Schuler, P (2010) Nodding or needling: analyzing delegate responsiveness in an authoritarian parliament. American Political Science Review 106(4), 762–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J and Zoido, P (2004) How to subvert democracy: Montesinos in Peru. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(4), 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdie, A and Davis, DR (2012) Shaming and blaming: using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly 56(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, K and Artingstall, N (1994) Government and private censorship in nine Western democracies. In Budge, I and McKay, DH (eds), Developing Democracy: Comparative Research in Honour of J.F.P. Blondel. London: Sage, pp. 297–321.Google Scholar
Paxton, Robert O (2004) The Anatomy of Fascism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Prat, A and Strömberg, D (2013) The political economy of mass media. In Acemoglu, D, Arellano, M, and Dekel, E (eds), Advances in Economics and Econometrics. Volume 2: Applied Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qualter, TH (1985) Opinion Control in the Democracies. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, OJ and Szakonyi, D (2015) Online social media and political awareness in authoritarian regimes. British Journal of Political Science 45(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, GB (2010) The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadmehr, M and Bernhardt, D (2015) State censorship. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 7(2), 280–307.Google Scholar
Shane, S (1995) Dismantling Utopia: How Information Ended the Soviet Union. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
Stern, RE and Hassid, J (2012) Amplifying silence: uncertainty and control parables in contemporary China. Comparative Political Studies 45(10), 1230–1254.Google Scholar
Svolik, M (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truex, R (2014) The returns to office in a “rubber stamp” parliament. American Political Science Review 108(2), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truex, R and Tavana, D (2019) Implicit attitudes toward an authoritarian regime. Journal of Politics 81(3), 1014–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y (2016) Tying the Autocrat's Hands: The Rise of the Rule of Law in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, JC (2014) Powerful Patriots: Nationalist Protest in China's Foreign Relations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintrobe, R (2000) The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, A (2019) Channeling Fisher: randomization tests and the statistical insignificance of seemingly significant experimental results. Quarterly Journal of Economics 134(2), 557–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Beazer et al. supplementary material

Beazer et al. supplementary material

Download Beazer et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 755.5 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Beazer et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WAEFB1
Link