Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:38:50.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Super-Predator Effect: How Negative Targeted Messages Demobilize Black Voters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2021

Christopher Stout Open the ORCID record for Christopher Stout [Opens in a new window]  and
Keith Baker
Christopher Stout*
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
Keith Baker
Affiliation:
SUNY Brockport, Rochester, NY, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article assesses whether messages that are framed to denigrate a politician or political entity in the eyes of a particular group – defined here as negative targeted messages – decreases Blacks' enthusiasm to vote. It also explores why such messages are effective at demobilizing Black voters. Using a survey experiment implemented on a nationally representative sample, the authors find that Blacks are less enthusiastic about voting when presented with evidence of racism within their preferred political party. Whites and Latinxs do not respond similarly to the same stimulus. The findings also demonstrate evidence that the effectiveness of negative targeted messages towards Blacks is driven by the treatment's ability to alter perceptions of party empathy. Overall, the results suggest that targeted negative messages can be effective at depressing Black turnout. However, parties may be able to counter this negative messaging with evidence of outreach to minority communities to demonstrate a greater sense of empathy.

Keywords

African-American politicspolitical behaviorvoter turnoutnegative messaging
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 1099 - 1112
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alamillo, R (2019) Hispanics para trump? Denial of racism and Hispanic support for Trump. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 16(2), 457–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S and Iyengar, S (1995) Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S et al. (1994) Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review 88(4), 829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, RM and Kenny, DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, J, Castillo, M and Petrie, R (2016) Negative campaigning, fundraising, and voter turnout: a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 121, 99–113.Google Scholar
Bolsen, T et al. (2014) The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior 36(2), 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botero, S et al. (2015) Says who? An experiment on allegations of corruption and credibility of sources. Political Research Quarterly 68(3), 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, T and Bowler, S (1998) Direct democracy and minority rights: an extension. American Journal of Political Science 42(3) 1020–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, JE (1987) The revised theory of surge and decline. American Journal of Political Science 31(4), 965–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clatterbaugh, K (2018) Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity: Men, Women, and Politics in Modern Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, L (2020) Campaigning in a Racially Diversifying America: When and How Cross-Racial Electoral Mobilization Works. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G and Finch, S (2005) Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American psychologist 60(2), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, MC (1994) Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DeSipio, L (1998) Counting on the Latino Vote: Latinos as A new Electorate. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, JJ and Pearson-Merkowitz, S (2019) Ballot initiatives and status quo bias. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19(2), 180–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, SE and Geer, JG (1998) A spot check: casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science 42(2), 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A (2015) Regular voters, marginal voters, and the electoral effects of turnout. Political Science Research and Methods 3(2), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, P and Goldstein, K (1999) Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science 43(4), 1189–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridkin, K Kenney, PJ and Wintersieck, A (2015) Liar, liar, pants on fire: how fact-checking influences citizens’ reactions to negative advertising. Political Communication 32(1), 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frymer, P (1999) Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geer, JG (2006) In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Bedolla, L and Hosam, C (2021) Latino Politics. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Garcia-Rios, S, Pedraza, F and Wilcox-Archuleta, B (2019) Direct and indirect xenophobic attacks: unpacking portfolios of identity. Political Behavior 41(3), 633–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DP et al. (2010) Enough already about ‘black box’ experiments: studying mediation is more difficult than most scholars suppose. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628(1), 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickel, FR et al. (2021) The role of identity prioritization: why some Latinx support restrictionist immigration policies and candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly. Doi: 10.1093/poq/nfaa048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, SJ (2014) A behavioral measure of the enthusiasm gap in American elections. Electoral Studies 36(1), 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, III et al. (2014) The Rational Southerner: Black Mobilization, Republican Growth, and the Partisan Transformation of the American South. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L and Virtanen, S (1995) Subgroup differentiation and subgroup bias among Latinos as a function of familiarity and positive distinctiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(1), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, K et al. (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review 105(4), 765–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, KF and Kenney, PJ (1999) Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. American Political Science Review 93(4), 877–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, S and Krupnikov, Y (2016) Independent Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiss, D (2019) From epistemic to identity crisis: perspectives on the 2016 US presidential election. The International Journal of Press/Politics 24(3), 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumhuber, EG et al. (2018) Examining subjective and physiological responses to norm violation using text-based vignettes. International Journal of Psychology 53(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krupnikov, Y (2011) When does negativity demobilize? Tracing the conditional effect of negative campaigning on voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science 55(4), 797–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecheler, S, Schuck, AR and de Vreese, CH (2013) Dealing with feelings: positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications 38(2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, LC and Pearson-Merkowitz, S (2016) Going positive: the effects of negative and positive advertising on candidate success and voter turnout. Research & Politics 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015625078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, CB, Arceneaux, K and Nickerson, DW (2020) Do negatively framed messages motivate political participation? Evidence from four field experiments. American Politics Research 48(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, N (2006) Together they become one: examining the predictors of panethnic group consciousness among Asian Americans and Latinos. Social Science Quarterly 87(5), 993–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, K and Redlawsk, DP (2014) The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, R (2002) Experimental methodology in political science. Political Analysis 10(4), 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlwain, CD and Caliendo, SM (2011)Race Appeal How Candidates Invoke Race in U.S. Political Campaigns. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, T (2001) The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, DC (2002) The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science 46(4), 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, F (2012) Republicans less enthusiastic about voting in 2012. In Newport, F (ed.), The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion 2011. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 430–431.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, C (2016) All about that base: changing campaign strategies in US presidential elections. Party Politics 22(2), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedraza, FI (2014) The two-way street of acculturation, discrimination, and Latino immigration restrictionism. Political Research Quarterly 67(4), 889–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, M, Glass, J and Avery, J (2001) Public perceptions of bias in the news media: Taking a closer look at the hostile media phenomenon. Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2001.Google Scholar
Peffley, M, Shields, T and Williams, B (1996) The intersection of race and crime in television news stories: an experimental study. Political Communication 13(3), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpot, T (2009) Race, Republicans, and the Return of the Party of Lincoln. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Piatak, J, Mohr, Z and Leland, S (2017) Bureaucratic accountability in third-party governance: experimental evidence of blame attribution during times of budgetary crisis. Public Administration 95(4), 976–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reny, TT, Valenzuela, AA and Collingwood, L (2020) No, you're playing the race card: testing the effects of anti-Black, anti-Latino, and anti-immigrant appeals in the post-Obama era. Political Psychology 41(2), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigueur, LW (2015) The Loneliness of the Black Republican: Pragmatic Politics and the Pursuit of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez, G, Masuoka, N and Abrams, B (2019) Revisiting the brown-utility heuristic: a comparison of Latino linked fate in 2006 and 2016. Politics, Groups, and Identities 7(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
Schudson, M (2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism 2(2), 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, J et al. (2019) Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, L and Kugler, M (2003) Why is research on the effects of negative campaigning so inconclusive? Understanding citizens’ perceptions of negativity. The Journal of Politics 65(1), 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smidt, CD (2017) Polarization and the decline of the American floating voter. American Journal of Political Science 61(2), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, C and Baker, K (2021), “The Super-Predator Effect: How Negative Targeted Messages Demobilize Black Voter”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RYIERX, Harvard Dataverse, V1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, CT (2018) Obamacares: candidate traits, descriptive representation, and Black political participation. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 3(2), 356–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, CT and Garcia, JR (2015) The big tent effect: descriptive candidates and Black and Latino political partisanship. American Politics Research 43(2), 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, K (1994) From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, K (2010) What's Going on? Political Incorporation and the Transformation of Black Public Opinion. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, NA, Hutchings, VL and White, IK (2002) Cues that matter: how political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review 96(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, NA et al. (2011) Election night's alright for fighting: the role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics 73(1), 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, TA (ed.) (2009) Racism and Discourse in Latin American. Washington, DC: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wamble, J (2018) Show Us that You Care: How Community Commitment Signals Affect Black Political Considerations (Unpublished Diss). University of Maryland. Available from https://doi.org/10.13016/M24746V6D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, MP and Brians, CL (1999) Negative campaign advertising: demobilizer or mobilizer? American Political Science Review 93(4), 891–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, IK (2007) When race matters and when it doesn't: racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review 101(2), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, IK and Laird, CN (2020). Steadfast Democrats: How social forces shape black political behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press., Google Scholar
Wood, T and Porter, E (2019) The elusive backfire effect: mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior 41(1), 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Stout and Baker Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RYIERX
Link
Supplementary material: File

Stout and Baker supplementary material

Stout and Baker supplementary material

Download Stout and Baker supplementary material(File)
File 290.6 KB