Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:35:41.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size of Place and Local Labour Strength

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

W. P. Grant
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent examination of size of place as a factor affecting electoral behaviour, Bealey and Dyer came to the ‘general conclusion’ that ‘the Labour vote in Britain is proportionately stronger in those constituencies which are part of large places’. Is such a relationship between size of place and Labour strength displayed in local elections?

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 259 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bealey, F. and Dyer, M., ‘Size of Place and the Labour Vote in Britain, 1918–1966’, Western Political Quarterly, XXIV (1971), 84–113.Google Scholar

2 See Stanyer, J., ‘Social and Rational Models of Man: Alternative Approaches to the Study of Local Elections’, The Advancement of Science, XXVI (1970), 399–407Google Scholar, and Grant, W. P., ‘Attitudes Towards Local Government in a Small Resort Town’, South-Western Review of Public Administration, X (1971), 34–9.Google Scholar

3 Bealey, and Dyer, , ‘Size of Place and Labour Vote’, pp. 102–3.Google Scholar