Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:48:35.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship Between Government Popularity and Approval for the Government's Record in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

John Hudson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The past decade has seen the growth of a considerable literature on the link between government popularity, as reflected by the proportion of the public indicating their intention to vote for the government in opinion polls, and the state of the economy, as represented by certain key variables. The work began in the early 1970s with articles by Goodhart and Bhansali, Mueller, and Kramer. It continued through the decade; some of the more recent contributions can be found in a set of readings edited by Hibbs and Fassbender. However, despite the amount and quality of this work, problems remain. Principal amongst these, as Chrystal and Alt have pointed out, is the inability to estimate a relationship which exhibits any degree of stability either over time or between researchers. Nearly all the studies have been successful in finding a significant relationship for specific time periods, but when these are extended, or when the function is used to forecast outside the original estimation period, the relationship appears to break down.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 165 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goodhart, C. A. E. and Bhansali, R. J., ‘Political Economy’, Political Studies, XVIII (1970), 43–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Mueller, J., ‘Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson’, American Political Science Review, LXIV (1971), 18–34.Google Scholar

3 Kramer, G. H., ‘Short-term Fluctuations in US Voting Behaviour 1896–1964’, American Political Science Review, LXV (1971), 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Hibbs, D. A. and Fassbender, H., eds, Contemporary Political Economy (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1981).Google Scholar

5 Chrystal, K. A. and Alt, J. E., ‘Some Problems in Formulating and Testing a Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, XCI (1981), 730–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Pissarides, C. A., ‘British Government Popularity and Economic Performance’, Economic Journal, XC (1980), 569–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Alt, J. E., The Politics of Economic Decline (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979) pp. 49–71.Google Scholar

8 Alt, , The Politics of Economic Decline, p. 128.Google Scholar

9 Kernell, S. and Hibbs, D. A., ‘A Critical Threshold Model of Presidential Popularity’Google Scholar, in Hibbs, and Fassbender, , eds, Contemporary Political Economy, pp. 49–71.Google Scholar

10 Fiorina, M., ‘Short- and Long-term Effects of Economic Conditions on Individual Voting Decisions’Google Scholar, in Hibbs, and Fassbender, , eds. Contemporary Political Economy, pp. 73–100.Google Scholar

11 Miller, W. L. and Mackie, M., ‘The Electoral Cycle and the Asymmetry of Government and Opposition Popularity: An Alternative Model of the Relationship Between Economic Conditions and Political Popularity’. Political Studies, XXI (1973), 263–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Pissarides, , ‘British Government Popularity and Economic Performance’, pp. 574–5.Google Scholar

13 Mueller, , ‘Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson’, p. 20.Google Scholar

14 Hibbs, D. A., ‘Economic Outcomes and Political Support for British Governments Amongst Occupational Classes: A Dynamic Analysis’. American Political Science Review, LXXVI (1982), 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Granger, C. W. J., ‘Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods’, Econometrica, XXXVII (1969), 428–38.Google Scholar

16 Pissarides, , ‘British Government Popularity and Economic Performance’, p. 571.Google Scholar

17 Goodhart, and Bhansali, , ‘Political Economy’, pp. 61–5.Google Scholar

18 Box, G. E. and Pearce, D. A., ‘Distribution of Residual Autocorrelations in Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Time Series Models’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, LXV (1970), 1509–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 A full discussion of ARIMA modelling can be found in Pindyck, R. S. and Rubinfeld, D. L., Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (Tokyo: McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha, 1976), pp. 417–550.Google Scholar

20 Alt, , The Politics of Economic Decline, p. 128.Google Scholar