Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T18:43:14.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redistribution and the Quality of Government: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2020

Bilyana Petrova
Bilyana Petrova*
Affiliation:
European University Institute
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The welfare state literature has largely ignored the impact of a country's quality of government on its levels of redistribution. Using cross-sectional time-series analysis of twenty-one Central and Eastern European countries, this article shows that environments characterized by higher levels of corruption, rampant bureaucratic inefficiency and ineffective enforcement of the rule of law are associated with lower levels of redistribution. Poor government directly affects the supply side of the redistribution process by hindering countries’ ability to allocate funds to redistribution and deliver them to their beneficiaries. Contrary to existing demand-oriented perspectives, the proposed causal mechanism does not blame lower redistribution on the lack of public support for the welfare state. Rather, it focuses on the capacity of states to adopt and implement inequality-reducing policies. The results are robust to numerous extensions and model specifications.

Keywords

redistributionquality of governmentcorruptionpost-communist Europe
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 374 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aachen, CH (2000) Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Society, Los Angeles, CA, 20–22 July.Google Scholar
Adsera, A and Boix, C (2002) Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector: the political underpinnings of openness. International Organization 56(2), 229–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A and Glaeser, EL (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, H and Orenstein, MA (2018) From Triumph to Crisis: Neoliberal Economic Reform in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aramburú, CE (2010) Informe compilatorio: el Programa Juntos, resultados y retos. Lima: Programa Nacional de Apoyo Directo a los Más Pobres – JUNTOS.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K et al. (2012) Comparative Political Data Set III 1990–2010. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
Beck, N and Katz, JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89(03), 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N and Katz, JN (2004) Time-Series-Cross-Section Issues: Dynamics, 2004. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bohle, D and Greskovits, B (2012) Capitalist Diversity on Europe's Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, C (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubbico, A, Elkink, JA and Okolikj, M (2017) Quality of government and regional competition: a spatial analysis of subnational regions in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research 56(4), 887–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E and Murillo, MV (2004) Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science 48(4), 742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerami, A and Vanhuysse, P (eds) (2009) Post-Communist Welfare Pathways. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, MD and Ito, H (2008) A new measure of financial openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10(3), 309–322.Google Scholar
Chong, A and Calderon, C (2000) Institutional quality and income distribution. Economic Development and Cultural Change 48(4), 761–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M et al. (2017) V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v7.1. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, S et al. (2016) The Quality of Government Basic Dataset, Version Jan16. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg Quality of Government Institute. Available from http://www.qog.pol.gu.se.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, S, Linde, J and Holmberg, S (2015) Democratic discontent in old and new democracies: assessing the importance of democratic input and governmental output. Political Studies 63, 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallinger, U (2010) Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences? Journal of European Social Policy 20(4), 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mesquita, BB and Smith, A (2005) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Díaz, R et al. (2009) Análisis de la Implementación del Programa JUNTOS en las Regiones de Apurímac, Huancavelica Y Huánuco. Lima: CARE Perú, CIES.Google Scholar
Earle, B (2000) Bribery and corruption in Eastern Europe, the Baltic states, and the Commonwealth of Independent States: what is to be done. Cornell International Law Journal 33(3), 483–513.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
European Social Survey (2016) Cumulative File, ESS 1-7, Data file edition 1.0. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
Garay, C (2017) Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, G (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley, B (2006) The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: results for 72 countries. European Journal of Political Research 45(3), 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A (2007) Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S and Kaufman, RR (2008) Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Helliwell, JF and Huang, H (2008) How's your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science 38(4), 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, J (1998) Winners take all. World Politics 50(2), 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G and Levitsky, S (2004) Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2(4), 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, A (1994) Introduction to pooling. In Hicks, A and Janoski, T (eds), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, AC (2016) Forbearance. American Political Science Review 110(2), 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, AC (2017) Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics of Informal Welfare in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, S and Rothstein, B (2011) Dying of corruption. Health Economics, Policy and Law 6(4), 529–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmberg, S, Rothstein, B and Nasiritousi, N (2011) Quality of government: what you get. Annual Review of Political Science 12, 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, L (2006) Rotten States? Corruption, Post-Communism, and Neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, E and Stephens, JD (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E and Stephens, JD (2012) Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T and Cusack, TR (2000) The causes of welfare state expansion: deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics 52(3), 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T and Soskice, D (2006) Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review 100(02), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, MM (2013) The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: a pseudo panel approach. Journal of European Social Policy 23(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, D (2004) The Costs of Corruption. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D, Kraay, A and Mastruzzi, M (2009) Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L and Pontusson, J (2005) Rising inequality and the politics of redistribution in affluent countries. Perspectives on Politics 3(3), 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, J and Rose-Ackerman, S (2004) Building A Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, B and Kpundeh, SJ (eds) (2004) Building State Capacity in Africa: New Approaches, Emerging Lessons. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lipsmeyer, CS (2002) Parties and policy: evaluating economic and partisan influences on welfare policy spending during the European post-communist transition. British Journal of Political Science 32(4), 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveless, M and Whitefield, S (2011) Being unequal and seeing inequality: explaining the political significance of social inequality in new market democracies. European Journal of Political Research 50(2), 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, N and Pontusson, J (2011) The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review 105(2), 316–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, PC (2014) Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research 53(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahutga, MC and Bandelj, N (2008) Foreign investment and income inequality the natural experiment of Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49(6), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, MG, Gurr, TR and Jaggers, K (2016) Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2015. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Mason, DS, Kluegel, JR and Khakhulina, LA (2000) Marketing Democracy: Changing Opinion About Inequality and Politics in East Central Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Meltzer, AH and Richard, SF (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 8(5), 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, L (2003) Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, EN (1988) Democracy, economic development, and income inequality. American Sociological Review 53, 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, C (2006) Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Orenstein, MA (2008) Postcommunist welfare states. Journal of Democracy 19(4), 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, B (2019) Replication data for: Redistribution and the quality of government: evidence from Central and Eastern Europe, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/APVNPF, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:i+0vf2SQ+lYFkHa2dgdeLg== [fileUNF].Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G and Tucker, JA (2017) Communism's Shadow: Historical Legacies and Contemporary Political Attitudes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D (1996) Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? (No. w5537). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R and Makkai, T (1995) Consensus or dissensus about welfare in post-communist societies? European Journal of Political Research 28(2), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B (2011) The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B, Samanni, M and Teorell, J (2012) Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the quality of government. European Political Science Review 4(01), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, BO and Teorell, JA (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21(2), 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudra, N (2008) Globalization and the Poor: Who Really Gets Hurt in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, M, Cook, L and Orenstein, M (1999) Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Seligson, MA (2002) The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics 64(2), 408–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T (1992) Protecting Mothers and Soldiers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, F (2016) The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly 97(5), 1267–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, JD (1979) The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockemer, D and Sundström, A (2014) Corruption and citizens’ satisfaction with democracy in Europe: what is the empirical linkage? In Debiel, T and Gawrich, A (eds), (Dys-)Functionalities of Corruption. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S (2013) Government quality, egalitarianism, and attitudes to taxes and social spending: a European comparison. European Political Science Review 5(3), 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, M and Letki, N (2009) When left is right: party ideology and policy in post-communist Europe. American Political Science Review 103(04), 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, MA (2005) Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, MA (2009) Corruption and compliance in the EU's post-communist members and candidates. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47, 43–62.Google Scholar
Valeriani, E and Peluso, S (2011) The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and development: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology 1(6), 1–25.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K and Vis, B (2013) Comparative Welfare State Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, HL (1974) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (ed.) (2015) World Development Indicators 2012. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Petrova Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/APVNPF
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Petrova supplementary material

Appendix

Download Petrova supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 650.9 KB