Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:37:29.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patrimonial Economic Voting and Asset Value – New Evidence from Taxation Register Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2016

Mikael Persson  and
Johan Martinsson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research on economic voting has moved beyond the traditional reward–punishment hypothesis, according to which the economy is merely considered a valence issue. Instead, patrimonial economic voting research looks at voters as property owners within the economic system. These studies have relied on survey items that measure whether individuals own different kinds of property to test the patrimonial dimension. This study emphasizes the importance of a surprisingly neglected aspect: the value of assets. It uses official register data files from the Swedish Tax Agency on the value of individuals’ assets merged with survey data from the 2006 Swedish National Election Study. The study finds that the relationship between patrimony and voting behavior in Sweden is similar to that found in other countries, but only when it is tested in a similar way as in these studies – that is, only when it is coded as whether voters own different assets. This study brings three important contributions to the debate. First, it offers a new empirically based categorization of the dimensionality of asset ownership and shows that the previous distinction between low- and high-risk assets is insufficient. Secondly, it shows that merely having assets or not, which is what previous studies have measured, is not what primarily matters; the relevant factor is the value of the assets. And thirdly, it demonstrates that only the value of some kinds of assets matters (especially stocks and real estate properties), while other assets (savings in bonds and funds) do not affect voting behavior or political opinions.

Keywords

economic votingwealth and political behaviour
Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 825 - 842
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden (emails: [email protected], [email protected]). Persson’s work in this project was supported by ‘Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne’. The authors wish to thank participants for useful comments from presentations at APSA 2013 in Chicago and a seminar at the University of Gothenburg. In order to access the register data used for this article, the authors had to sign a contract stating that they were not allowed to make the data publicly available. The authors were only allowed to analyze the data using Statistics Sweden’s remote server system MONA. The dataset and Stata do-files used to carry out the analyses are stored at Statistics Sweden, Stockholm. Instructions on how to obtain the data replication files for the analyses are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS. Online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123416000181.

References

Alesina, Alesina, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason. 2006. Rational Exuberance: The Stock Market and Public Support for Social Security Privatization. Journal of Politics 68:50–61.Google Scholar
Bélanger, Éric, Nadeau, Richard, Turgeon, Mathieu, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Foucault, Martial. 2014. Patrimony and French Presidential Vote Choice: Evidence from the 2012 Election. French Politics 12:59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Lobo, and , Marna. 2013. Dimensions of the Economic Vote: Valence, Positional and Patrimony Voting in Portugal’s 2011 Elections. Electoral Studies 32:460–464.Google Scholar
Fauvelle-Aymar, Chrstine, and Steigmaier, Mary. 2013. The Stock Market and US Presidential Approval. Electoral Studies 32:411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Martial. 2013. Vote et richesse économique (Voting and economic wealth). In Les Québécois aux urnes: les partis, les médias et les citoyens en campagne (The Quebecers at the Polls: The Parties, the Media and the Citizens during Campaigns), edited by Frédérick Bastien, Éric Bélanger and François Gélineau, 219–31. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Foucault, Martial, Nadeau, Richard, and Lewis-Beck, Michael. 2013. Patrimonial Voting: Refining the Measures. Electoral Studies 32:557–562.Google Scholar
Fraile, Marta, and Lewis-Beck, Michael. 2013. Multi-Dimensional Economic Voting in Spain: The 2008 Election. Electoral Studies 32:465–469.Google Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. Retrospective Voting Reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science 16:285–306.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, Donald R. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Nadeau, Richard. 2011. Economic Voting Theory: Testing New Dimensions. Electoral Studies 30:288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, Nadeau, Richard, and Foucault, Martial. 2013. The Complete Economic Voter: New Theory and British Evidence. British Journal of Political Science 43:241–261.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Stegmaier, Mary. 2007. Economic Models of Voting. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by R. J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann, 518–537. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martinsson, Johan. 2013. Economic Voting in Sweden 1985–2010. Electoral Studies 32:470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklewright, John, and Schnepf, Sylke V.. 2010. How Reliable are Income Data Collected with a Single Question? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 173:409–429.Google Scholar
Moore, Jeffrey C., and Welniak, Edward J.. 2000. Income Measurement Error in Surveys: A Review. Journal of Official Statistics 16:331–362.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Foucault, Martial, and Lewis-Beck, Michael. 2010. Patrimonial Economic Voting: Legislative Elections in France. West European Politics 33:1261–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Foucault, Martial, and Lewis-Beck, Michael. 2011. Assets and Risk: A Neglected Dimension of Economic Voting. French Politics 9:97–119.Google Scholar
Naurin, Elin, and Håkansson, Niklas. 2015. The Swedish Election Pledge Data Base. The Swedish National Election Study Programme, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Naurin, Elin, and Oscarsson, Henrik. 2015. When and Why are Voters Correct in Their Evaluations of Specific Government Performance? Evidence from Sweden. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Oscarsson, Henrik. 2007. A Matter of Fact: Knowledge Effects on the Vote in Swedish General Elections, 1985–2002. Scandinavian Political Studies 30:301–322.Google Scholar
Oscarsson, Henrik, and Holmberg, Sören. 2008. Regeringsskifte: Väljarna och valet 2006 (Change of Government: The Voters and the 2006 Election). Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.Google Scholar
Stegmaier, Mary, and Lewis-Beck, Michael.. 2013. Economic Voting. In Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science, edited by Rick Valelly. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Randolph, and Duch, Raymon. 2013. The Meaning and Use of Subjective Perceptions in Studies of Economic Voting. Electoral Studies 32:305–320.Google Scholar
Stubager, Rune, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Nadeau, Richard. 2013. Reaching for Profit in the Welfare State: Patrimonial Economic Voting in Denmark. Electoral Studies 32:438–444.Google Scholar
Withey, Stephen B. 1954. Reliability of Recall of Income. Public Opinion Quarterly 18:197–204.Google Scholar
Yan, Ting, Curtin, Richard, and Jans, Matthew. 2010. Trends in Income Nonresponse Over Two Decades. Journal of Official Statistics 26:145–164.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Persson and Martinsson Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JRSFS9
Link
Supplementary material: File

Persson and Martinsson supplementary material

Appendix

Download Persson and Martinsson supplementary material(File)
File 192 KB