Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:31:32.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jus Post Bellum and the Responsibility to Rebuild

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2013

James Pattison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers the issue of who should rebuild after war. Many leading advocates of the relevance of jus post bellum for Just War Theory adhere to the ‘Belligerents Rebuild Thesis’, which holds that those who have been involved with the fighting – such as the victor, just belligerent, unjust aggressor or humanitarian intervener – should be tasked with the responsibility to rebuild. By contrast, this article argues that there is a collective, international duty to rebuild that should be assigned primarily according to the agent's ability to rebuild – and not necessarily to the belligerents. The article also claims that, in contrast to the prevailing view, considerations of jus post bellum do not play any moral role in the justifiability of a war. Accordingly, defending the Belligerents Rebuild Thesis by invoking the alleged moral relevance of jus post bellum for Just War Theory is mistaken.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 635 - 661
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Politics, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester (email: [email protected]). An earlier version of this article was presented at the International Studies Association's annual conference in San Francisco, April 2013. I would like to thank Jonathan Floyd, Pablo Kalmanovitz, Phil Orchard, Tom Sinclair and two anonymous referees for their very helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Bass, Gary J. 2004. Jus Post Bellum. Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (4):384–412.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations, Revised Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. 2008. The Responsibilities of Victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War. Review of International Studies 34 (4):601–625.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. Williams, Paul D.. 2009. The West and Contemporary Peace Operations. Journal of Peace Research 46 (1):39–57.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, John. 2001. A Pragmatic Approach to Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance. Available from http://sites.tufts.edu/jha/files/2011/04/a072.pdf, accessed 24 June 2013.Google Scholar
Coady, C.A.J. 2011. The Jus Post Bellum . In New Wars and New Soldiers: Military Ethics in the Contemporary World, edited by Paolo Tripodi and Jessica Wolfendal, 49–66. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Evans, Mark. 2008. Balancing Peace, Justice and Sovereignty in Jus Post Bellum: The Case of ‘Just Occupation’. Millennium 36 (3):533–554.Google Scholar
Evans, Mark. 2009. Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of Jus Post Bellum . Ethics & International Affairs 23 (2):147–164.Google Scholar
Fleck, Dieter. 2012. The Responsibility to Rebuild and its Potential for Law-Creation: Good Governance, Accountability and Judicial Control. Journal of International Peacekeeping 16 (1–2):84–98.Google Scholar
Frowe, Helen. 2011. The Ethics of War and Peace: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gheciu, Alexandra Welsh, Jennifer M.. 2009. The Imperative to Rebuild: Assessing the Normative Case for Postconflict Reconstruction. Ethics & International Affairs 23 (2):121–146.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. 2005. Proportionality in the Morality of War. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (1):34–66.Google Scholar
ICISS. 2001. The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Jubilut, Liliana Lyra. 2011. Towards a New Jus Post Bellum: The United Nations Peacebuilding Commission and the Improvement of Post-Conflict Efforts and Accountability. Minnesota Journal of International Law 20 (1):26–64.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 2007. From Just War to Just Peace. In The Price of Peace: Just War in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Charles Reed and David Ryall, 255–273. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lango, John. 2007. Generalizing and Temporalizing Just War Principles: Illustrated by the Principle of Just Cause. In Rethinking the Just War Tradition, edited by Michael Brough, John Lango and Harry van der Linden, 75–95. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Lango, John. 2009. Military Operations by Armed UN Peace-keeping Missions: An Application of Generalised Just War Principles. In The Moral Dimension of Asymmetrical Warfare: Counter-terrorism, Western Values and Military Ethics, edited by Th. A. van Baarda and D.E.M. Verweij, 115–133. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lazar, Seth. 2012. Scepticism about Jus Post Bellum . In Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law, edited by Larry May and Andrew Forcehimes, 204–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Majima, Shunzo. 2009. Forgotten Victims of Military Humanitarian Intervention: A Case for the Principle of Reparation. Philosophia 37 (2):203–209.Google Scholar
McCready, Doug. 2009. Ending the War Right: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War Tradition. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (1):66–78.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2009a. Killing in War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2009b. The Morality of Military Occupation. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 31 (1):7–29.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2001. Distributing Responsibilities. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (4):453–471.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2009. The Responsibility to Protect Human Rights. In Legitimacy, Justice, and Public International Law, edited by Lukas Meyer, 232–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (2):113–147.Google Scholar
Orend, Brian. 2006. The Morality of War. Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Orend, Brian. 2007. Jus Post Bellum: The Perspective of a Just-War Theorist. Leiden Journal of International Law 20 (3):571–591.Google Scholar
Pattison, James. 2007. Representativeness and Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (4):569–587.Google Scholar
Pattison, James. 2010. Humanitarian and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pattison, James. 2013. When Is it Right to Fight? Just War Theory and the Individual-Centric Approach. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):35–54.Google Scholar
Piiparinen, Touko. 2007. The Lessons of Darfur for the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. Global Governance 13 (3):365–390.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights, Second Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. The Law of Peoples, with the ‘Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richmond, Oliver. 2009. A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday. Review of International Studies 35 (3):557–580.Google Scholar
Rodin, David. 2011. Ending War. Ethics & International Affairs 25 (3):359–369.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrei. 2007. Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State. Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1):3–39.Google Scholar
St Augustine of Hippo. 1994 [487]. Letter 189, to Boniface in Political Writings, translated by Michael W. Tkacz and Douglas Kries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2006. The Duty to Protect. In NOMOS XLVII: Humanitarian Intervention, edited by Terry Nardin and Melissa S. Williams, 84–116. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2012. The Aftermath of War: Reflections on Jus Post Bellum . In Ethics Beyond War's End, edited by Eric Patterson, 35–46. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 2009. What's Wrong with the United Nations and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar