Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:45:48.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It's All About Solidarity Stupid! How Solidarity Frames Structure the Party Political Sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2020

Peter Thijssen Open the ORCID record for Peter Thijssen [Opens in a new window]  and
Pieter Verheyen Open the ORCID record for Pieter Verheyen [Opens in a new window]
Peter Thijssen*
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
Pieter Verheyen
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inspired by Lipset and Rokkan, the field of political science has primarily focused on party oppositions as a derivative of historically anchored conflicts among social groups. Yet parties are not mere social mirrors; they are also active interpreters of social context. In a globalized era they deploy conflicting frames on how solidarity may be preserved, as recent work on populist welfare chauvinism shows. However, the role of party political agency in framing solidarity lacks an overarching framework. This article therefore proposes a Durkheimian model that takes the integrative pole of the conflict–integration dialectic seriously and distinguishes among group-based, compassionate, exchange-based and empathic frames. The authors test this solidarity framework in Flanders (Belgium) – a good case study due to its fragmented party system and increasing economic and cultural openness. The content analyses of party manifestos presented here suggest that a solidarity-based deductive approach to studying partisan competition is relevant because partisan differentiation along solidarity lines is growing; this evolution converges with similar inductive expert-based and issue-based findings.

Keywords

solidarityparty competitionmanifestocleavageframingintegrationconflict
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 128 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J and Somer-Topcu, Z (2009) Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39(4), 825–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agalev (1995) 21 mei. Begin met een schoon blad. [May 21. Start with a clean sheet]. Brussels: Agalev. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D (2008) The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, P (1990) The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, K and Kymlicka, W (2017) The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S and Mair, P (2007). Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stability of European Electorates, 1885–1985. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Bauböck, R and Scholten, P (2016) Introduction to the special issue: ‘solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism’. Comparative Migration Studies 4(1), 4. doi: 10.1186/s40878-016-0025-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beh, EJ (2004) Simple correspondence analysis: a bibliographic review. International Statistical Review 72(2), 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beramendi, P, et al. (2015) The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornschier, S (2010) Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
CD&V (2014) 3D PLAN. Brussels: CD&V. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/Google Scholar
CVP (1995) Programma van de Vlaamse christen-democraten voor de parlementsverkiezingen van 21 mei 1995 [Manifesto of the Flemish Christian democrats for the parliamentary elections of May 21st, 1995]. Brussels: CVP. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/Google Scholar
Dalton, RJ and Wattenberg, MP (2002) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, R and Walter, S (2015) Globalization, labor market risks, and class cleavages. In Beramendi, P, Häusermann, S, Kitschelt, H and Kriesi, H (eds), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deegan-Krause, K and Enyedi, Z (2010) Agency and the structure of party competition: alignment, stability and the role of political elites. West European Politics 33(3), 686–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Koster, W, Achterberg, P and Van der Waal, J (2013) The new right and the welfare state: the electoral relevance of welfare chauvinism and welfare populism in the Netherlands. International Political Science Review 34(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, CE and Hobolt, SB (2012) When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. European Union Politics 13(2), 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, CE and Marks, G (2012) The struggle over dimensionality: a note on theory and empirics. European Union Politics 13(2), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, CE and Solaz, H (2019) Sweeping it under the rug: how government parties deal with deteriorating economic conditions. Party Politics 25(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E (2014 [1893]) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Z (2005) The role of agency in cleavage formation. European Journal of Political Research 44(5), 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fararo, TJ and Doreian, P (1998) The theory of solidarity: an agenda of problems. In Doreian, P and Fararo, TJ (eds), The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Franklin, MN, Mackie, TT and Valen, H (2009) Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franzmann, S and Kaiser, A (2006) Locating political parties in policy space: a reanalysis of party manifesto data. Party Politics 12(2), 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J (1998) Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, MJ (1984) Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
GROEN (2014) Samen Beter Doen [Doing it Better Together]. Brussels: Groen. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/Google Scholar
Hirschmann, AO (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before its Triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofferbert, RI and Budge, I (1992) The party mandate and the Westminster model: election programmes and government spending in Britain, 1948–85. British Journal of Political Science 22(2), 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A (1996) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L and Marks, G (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25(1), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignazi, P (2014) Power and the (il) legitimacy of political parties: an unavoidable paradox of contemporary democracy? Party Politics 20(2), 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H and McGann, AJ (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H (2010) Restructuration of partisan politics and the emergence of a new cleavage based on values. West European Politics 33(3), 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H (2015) Enlightened understanding, empowerment and leadership – three ways to enhance multiculturalism: comment on will Kymlicka's article: ‘solidarity in diverse societies’. Comparative Migration Studies 3(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H et al. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W (2015) Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism. Comparative Migration Studies 3(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M, Benoit, K and Garry, J (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97(2), 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, P, et al. (2017) Manifesto Corpus. Version: 2017-1. Retrieved from: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
Lipset, SM and Rokkan, S (1967) Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: an introduction. In Lipset, SM and Rokkan, S (eds), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Lowe, W (2015) Yoshikoder: Cross-platform multilingual content analysis. Java software version 0.6.5, URL: http://www.yoshikoder.orgGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S (1977) Essays in Social Theory. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, G and Steenbergen, M (2002) Understanding political contestation in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 35(8), 879–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C (2005) On the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
N-VA (2014) Verandering voor Vooruitgang [Change for Progress]. Brussels: N-VA. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
Open VLD (2014) Vlaanderen vleugels geven [Giving Flanders wings]. Brussels: Open VLD. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
Pauwels, T (2011) Explaining the strange decline of the populist radical right Vlaams Belang in Belgium: the impact of permanent opposition. Acta Politica 46(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, WH (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, SJ (2008) Political Solidarity. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Schumacher, G and Van Kersbergen, K (2016) Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Politics 22(3), 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, CA and Smith, KB (2000) A rhetorical perspective on the 1997 British party manifestos. Political Communication 17(4), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SP (1995) Verkiezingsprogramma 21 mei 1995 van de SP (België) [Electoral program of SP (Belgium) May 21st 1995]. Brussels: SP. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/Google Scholar
sp.a (2014) Sociale welvaart [Social welfare]. Brussels: sp.a. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/Google Scholar
Spicker, P (2006) Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Stjernø, S (2005) Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, M and Potter, JD (2015) The effect of inequality and social identity on party strategies. American Journal of Political Science 59(3), 744–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen, P (2012) From mechanical to organic solidarity, and back with Honneth beyond Durkheim. European Journal of Social Theory 15(4), 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen, P (2016) Intergenerational solidarity: the paradox of reciprocity imbalance in ageing welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology 67(4), 592–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thijssen, P and Verheyen, P (2020) “Replication Data for: It's All About Solidarity Stupid! How Solidarity Frames Structure the Party Political Sphere https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SMRBPN, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:nMcxXiWWcWm/WZw15Gg2nw== [fileUNF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, W and Arts, W (2005) The social capital of European welfare states: the crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy 15(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, (2006) Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlaams Belang (2014) Uw Stok Achter De Deur [Your Big Stick]. Brussels: Vlaams Belang. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
Vlaams Blok (1995) Nu afrekenen! [Settle it now!]. Brussels: Vlaams Blok. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
VLD (1995) Het federaal regeerprogramma van de VLD [The federal electoral program of VLD]. Brussels: VLD. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
Volksunie (1995) Met hart en ziel voor Vlaanderen. Verkiezingsprogramma 21 mei 1995 [With heart and soul for Flanders. Electoral program May 21st 1995]. Brussels: Volksunie. Available at: https://visuals.manifesto-project.wzb.eu/mpdb-shiny/cmp_dashboard_dataset/.Google Scholar
Žižek, S (1997) Multiculturalism, or, the Cultural Logic of Multinational Capitalism. New Left Review.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Thijssen and Verheyen supplementary material

Thijssen and Verheyen supplementary material 1

Download Thijssen and Verheyen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 130.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Thijssen and Verheyen supplementary material

Thijssen and Verheyen supplementary material 2

Download Thijssen and Verheyen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 128.9 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Thijssen and Verheyen Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SMRBPN
Link