Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:38:53.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Chatter to Action: How Social Networks Inform and Motivate in Rural Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2021

Jennifer M. Larson Open the ORCID record for Jennifer M. Larson [Opens in a new window] ,
Janet I. Lewis Open the ORCID record for Janet I. Lewis [Opens in a new window]  and
Pedro L. Rodriguez Open the ORCID record for Pedro L. Rodriguez [Opens in a new window]
Jennifer M. Larson*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
Janet I. Lewis
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA
Pedro L. Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From public health to political campaigns, numerous attempts to encourage behavior begin with the spread of information. Of course, seeding new information does not guarantee action, especially when it is difficult for receivers to verify this information. We use a novel design that introduced valuable, actionable information in rural Uganda and reveals the intermediate process that led many in the village to hear the information but only some to act on it. We find that the seeded information spread easily through word of mouth via a simple contagion process. However, acting on the information spread less easily; this process relied instead on endogenously created social information that served to vet, verify, and pass judgment. Our results highlight an important wedge between information that a policy intervention can best control and the behavior that ultimately results.

Keywords

Networkspolicy interventioninformation and behavior diffusioncontagionword of mouthsocial informationUganda
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 1769 - 1789
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alatas, V et al. (2016) Network structure and the aggregation of information: theory and evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review 106(7), 1663–1704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apicella, CL et al. (2012) Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481(7382), 497–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballester, C, Calvó-Armengol, A, and Zenou, Y (2006) Who's who in networks. Wanted: the key player. Econometrica 74(5), 1403–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A et al. (2013) The diffusion of microfinance. Science 341, 6144.Google ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, A et al. (2019) Using Gossips to Spread Information: Theory and Evidence from Two Randomized Controlled Trials. The Review of Economic Studies 86(6), 2453–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, A, Ensminger, J, and Johnson, JC (2010) Social networks and trust in cross-cultural experiments. In Cook K, Levi M and Hardin R (eds) Whom Can We Trust? How Groups, Networks and Institutions Make Trust Possible. New York, NY, USA: Russell Sage Foundation Press, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar
Bond, RM et al. (2017) Social endorsement cues and political participation. Political Communication 34(2), 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J, De Janvry, A, and Sadoulet, E (2015) Social networks and the decision to insure. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7(2), 81–108.Google Scholar
Centola, D (2013) Homophily, networks, and critical mass: solving the start-up problem in large group collective action. Rationality and Society 25(1), 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centola, D and Macy, M (2007) Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology 113(3), 702–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, K (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, A et al. (2015) Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice, and party identification. Journal of Politics 77(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwe, MS-Y (1999) Structure and strategy in collective action. American Journal of Sociology 105(1), 128–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwe, MS-Y (2000) Communication and coordination in social networks. Review of Economic Studies 67(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, TG and Udry, CR (2010) Learning about a new technology: pineapple in Ghana. The American Economic Review 100(1), 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, C, Labonne, J, and Querubín, P (2017) Politician family networks and electoral outcomes: evidence from the Philippines. American Economic Review 107(10), 3006–3037.Google Scholar
Dunning, T et al. (2019) Voter information campaigns and political accountability: cumulative findings from a preregistered meta-analysis of coordinated trials. Science Advances 5(7), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eubank, N (2019) Social networks and the political salience of ethnicity. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 14, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, N et al. (2021) Viral voting: social networks and political participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 16(3), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, JD and Laitin, DD (1996) Explaining interethnic cooperation. The American Political Science Review 90(4), 715–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrali, R et al. (2019) It takes a village: peer effects and externalities in technology adoption. American Journal of Political Science 64(3), 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, AD and Rosenzweig, MR (1995) Learning by doing and learning from others: human capital and technical change in agriculture. Journal of Political Economy 103(6), 1176–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, AS and Green, DP (2000) The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: a field experiment. The American Political Science Review 94(3), 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habyarimana, J et al. (2009) Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Jackson, MO and Rogers, BW (2007) Relating network structure to diffusion properties through stochastic dominance. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 7(1), 0000102202193517041341.Google Scholar
Kempe, D, Kleinberg, J, and Tardos, É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States, pp. 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, JM (2017) Networks and interethnic cooperation. Journal of Politics 79(2), 546–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, JM and Lewis, JI (2017) Ethnic networks. American Journal of Political Science 61(2), 350–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, JM and Lewis, JI (2018) Rumors, kinship networks, and rebel group formation. International Organization 72(Fall), 871–903.Google Scholar
Larson, JM, Lewis, JI and Rodriguez, PL (2021) Replication Data for: From Chatter to Action: How Social Networks Inform and Motivate in Rural Uganda, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AC1GCB, Harvard Dataverse, V1 and in GitHub at: https://github.com/prodriguezsosa/FromChatterToAction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, JM and Rodriguez, PL (2020) The Attenuating Effect of Aggregating Networks. Working Paper. Available from https://www.dropbox.com/s/4t9h0lbpi9n350p/NetworkAgg_20180329.pdf?dl=0.Google Scholar
Lewis, JI (2020) How Insurgency Begins: Rebel Group Formation in Uganda and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, ES, Posner, DN, and Tsai, LL (2014) Does information lead to more active citizenship? Evidence from an information intervention in rural Kenya. World Development 60, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, E and Gugerty, MK (2005) Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics 89(11–12), 2325–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobius, M, Phan, T, and Szeidl, A (2015) Treasure Hunt: Social Learning in the Field. NBER Working Paper. Available from https://goo.gl/9LhbtmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, HL and Sanders, T (2003) Magical Interpretations, Material Realities: Modernity, Witchcraft and the Occult in Postcolonial Africa. Milton Park, England, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nathan, NL and Atwell, P (2020) Channels for influence or maps of behavior? A field experiment on social networks and cooperation. American Journal of Political Science, 1–18.Google Scholar
Newman, ME (2000) Models of the small world. Journal of Statistical Physics 101(3–4), 819–841.Google Scholar
Paluck, EL, Shepherd, H, and Aronow, PM (2016) Changing climates of conflict: a social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(3), 566–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Przeworski, A, Stokes, SC, and Manin, B (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, DA (2009) Social networks and collective action. American Journal of Political Science 53(1), 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, B, McConnell, M, and Michelson, MR (2013) Local canvassing: the efficacy of grassroots voter mobilization. Political Communication 30(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, A (2003) Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Young, HP (2009) Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: contagion, social influence, and social learning. American Economic Review 99(5), 1899–1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Larson et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AC1GCB
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Larson et al. supplementary material

Larson et al. supplementary material

Download Larson et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.3 MB