Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T19:23:18.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Decomposition of Electoral Bias in a Plurality Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

G. Gudgin  and
P. J. Taylor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper describes an empirical procedure for analysing the difference between the proportion of votes a major party attracts and the proportion of seats it subsequently wins in a plurality election. This difference will be referred to as the electoral bias with respect to that particular party at the election being analysed:

B = S — V, (1)

where S is the seat proportion and V the vote proportion gained by the party. This bias is the basic concept underlying much of the debate about electoral reform but curiously it has been an under-researched topic in political science literature. Apart from a small continuing debate over the cubic law of seat proportions and some analyses of Australian and New Zealand elections most attention in election studies has been concerned with determining the proportion of votes rather than the subsequent proportion of seats.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1980 , pp. 515 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A., ‘The Law of Cubic Proportions in Elections Results’, British Journal of Sociology, 1 (1950), 183–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Butler, D. E., The British General Election of 1951 (London: Macmillan, 1952)Google Scholar; Tufte, E. R., ‘The Relationship Between Seats and Votes in Two Party Systems’, American Political Science Review, LXVII (1973), 540–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Taagepera, R., ‘Seats and Votes: A Generalisation of the Cube Law of Elections’, Social Science Research, 11 (1973), 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Rydon, J., ‘The Relationship of Votes to Seats in Elections for the Australian House of Representatives, 1949–54’, Political Science, ix (1957), 49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Soper, C. S. and Rydon, J., ‘Under-representation and Election Prediction’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, iv (1958), 94–106Google Scholar; Brookes, R. H., ‘Electoral Distortion in New Zealand’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, V (1959), 218–33Google Scholar; Brookes, R. H., ‘The Analysis of Distorted Representation in Two Party, Single Member Elections’, Political Science, xii (1960), 158–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Johnston, R. J., ‘Spatial Structure, Plurality Systems and Electoral Bias’, Canadian Geographer, xx (1976), 310–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar These methods are applied to Britain in Johnston, R. J., ‘Parliamentary Seat Redistribution: More Opinions on the Theme’, Area, VIII (1976), 30–4.Google Scholar

3 Taylor, P. J., ‘Some Implications of the Spatial Organisation of Elections’, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, LX (1973), 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Taylor, P. J. and Johnston, R. J., Geography of Elections (Harmondsworth, Midx.: Penguin, 1979).Google Scholar

5 Taylor, P. J. and Gudgin, G., ‘The Myth of Non-Partisan Cartography: A Study of Electoral Biases in the English Boundary Commission's Redistribution for 1955–1970’, Urban Studies, xiii (1976), 13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gudgin, G. and Taylor, P. J., Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organisation of Elections (London: Pion, 1979).Google Scholar

6 Kendall, and Stuart, , ‘The Law of Cubic Proportions in Election Results’.Google Scholar

7 Gudgin, and Taylor, , Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organization of Elections.Google Scholar

8 Gudgin, and Taylor, , Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organization of Elections, Table 2.1, p. 23.Google Scholar

9 For further discussion see Gudgin, G. and Taylor, P. J., ‘Electoral Bias and the Distribution of Party Voters’, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, LXIII (1974), 53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Gudgin, and Taylor, , Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organization of Elections, Chap. 4.Google Scholar

10 For some alternative suggestions see Taylor, P. J., ‘The Changing Geography of Representation in Britain’, Area, xi (1980), 289–94Google Scholar and Johnston, R. J., ‘Regional Variations in the 1979 General Election Results for England’, Area, xi (1980), 294–7.Google Scholar