Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:03:16.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crime Victimization Increases Turnout: Evidence from Individual-Level Administrative Panel Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2020

Kim Mannemar Sønderskov Open the ORCID record for Kim Mannemar Sønderskov [Opens in a new window] ,
Peter Thisted Dinesen Open the ORCID record for Peter Thisted Dinesen [Opens in a new window] ,
Steven E. Finkel  and
Kasper M. Hansen Open the ORCID record for Kasper M. Hansen [Opens in a new window]
Kim Mannemar Sønderskov*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University,Aarhus, Denmark
Peter Thisted Dinesen
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen
Steven E. Finkel
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh
Kasper M. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What are the consequences of being the victim of crime for political participation? Previous studies report mixed results with respect to voter turnout, in contrast to the positive effects found for other indicators of political engagement. However, previous turnout studies have failed to differentiate between violent and non-violent crime, and have relied on cross-sectional survey data that is prone to measurement biases and selection effects. This article addresses these shortcomings via a panel analysis of official registry data from Denmark recording individual-level turnout in two municipal elections (in 2009 and 2013) and victimization from violent and non-violent crime. It identifies the effect of victimization by comparing changes in turnout between the two elections for victims and two different counterfactual groups: non-victims in the general population, and individuals who were victimized after the 2013 election. The results show that victimization from violent crime increases turnout by 2 to 3 percentage points. The study further demonstrates a large negative between-individual effect of victimization, suggesting that previous studies have been marred by severe selection bias.

Keywords

turnoutpolitical participationvictimizationcrimepanel data
Type
Letter
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 399 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateson, R (2012) Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review 106(3), 570–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M et al. (2016) Can war foster cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(3), 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A and Jones, K (2015) Explaining fixed effects: random effects modelling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods 3(1), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellows, J and Miguel, E (2009) War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. Journal of Public Economics 93(11–12), 1144–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berens, S and Dallendörfer, M (2019) Apathy or anger? How crime experience affects individual vote intention in Latin America and the Caribbean. Political Studies 67(4), 1010–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R, Chadha, A and Montjoy, R (2001) Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters. Public Opinion Quarterly 65(1), 22–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatti, Y, Danckert, B and Hansen, KM (2017) The context of voting: does neighborhood ethnic diversity affect turnout? Social Forces 95(3), 1127–1154.Google Scholar
Blattman, C (2009) From violence to voting: war and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review 103(2), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M (2008) Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns. Electoral Studies 27(4), 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, P and Vicente, P (2014) Votes and violence: evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria. Economic Journal 124(574), F327–F355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupe, T and Obrizan, M (2016) Violence and political outcomes in Ukraine: evidence from Sloviansk and Kramatorsk. Journal of Comparative Economics 44(1), 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorff, C (2017) Violence, kinship networks, and political resilience: evidence from Mexico. Journal of Peace Research 54(4), 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, P and Mullin, M (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. Journal of Politics 74(3), 796–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, C and Ellingworth, D (1997) Assessing the representativeness of the 1992 British crime survey: the impact of sampling error and response biases. Sociological Research Online 2(4), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A, Green, D and Larimer, C (2008) Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review 102(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, P (2014) Conflict and social and political preferences: evidence from World War II and civil conflict in 35 European countries. Comparative Economic Studies 56(3), 424–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, A and Morse, B (2018) Violence, empathy and altruism: evidence from the Ivorian refugee crisis in Liberia. British Journal of Political Science 50(2), 731–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kääriäinen, JT (2007) Trust in the police in 16 European countries. European Journal of Criminology 4(4), 409–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, S (2018) To vote or not to vote: how criminal violence shapes electoral participation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62(9), 1963–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lurigio, AJ (1987) Are all victims alike? The adverse, generalized, and differential impact of crime. Crime Delinquency 33(4), 452–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, M (2013) Does crime undermine public support for democracy? Findings from the case of Mexico. The Latin Americanist 57(2), 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, K and Rockmore, M (2016) Fear and Political Participation: Evidence from Africa. HICN Working Paper 226, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Skogan, W (1981) Issues in the Measurement of Victimization. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Trelles, A and Carreras, M (2012) Bullets and votes: violence and electoral participation in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America 4(2), 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visconti, G (2019) Policy preferences after crime victimization: panel and survey evidence from Latin America. British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sønderskov et al. supplementary material

Sønderskov et al. supplementary material

Download Sønderskov et al. supplementary material(File)
File 68 KB