Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:11:56.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Campaign Events, the Media and the Prospects of Victory: The 1992 and 1996 US Presidential Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

DARON R. SHAW  and
BRIAN E. ROBERTS
DARON R. SHAW
Affiliation:
Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin.
BRIAN E. ROBERTS
Affiliation:
Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Presidential campaigns are the most obvious means by which American voters receive information about candidates and issues, yet there is strong resistance to the notion that they influence presidential elections. We conduct an examination of presidential campaign effects in the 1992 and 1996 elections that features three departures from previous studies: (1) a stronger definition of campaigning and campaign events, facilitating a clearer idea of what it is that we are testing; (2) detailed data on television and newspaper coverage of the campaigns, allowing us to measure media effects; and (3) an alternative measure of electoral impact that is resistant to survey errors and random movement. We find that campaign events, and particularly media coverage of those events, significantly affect the candidates' chances for electoral success.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 259 - 289
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)