Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:45:06.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Things Really Getting Better? How To Validate Latent Variable Models of Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2017

Christopher J. Fariss
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

human rightstreaty compliancemeasurementlatent variable modelvalidity
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 275 - 282
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, University of Michigan (email: [email protected]; [email protected]). I would like to thank Margaret Ariotti, Megan Becker, Daniel Berliner, Nicole Bonoff, Chad Clay, Charles Crabtree, Geoff Dancy, Cassy Dorff, Jesse Driscoll, Maya Duru, Kristine Eck, Daniel Enemark, James Fowler, Micah Gell-Redman, Holly Guthrey, Peter Haschke, Cullen Hendrix, Danny Hill, Alex Hughes, Michael Kenwick, Milli Lake, Yon Lupu, Jonathan Markowitz, Kyle Marquardt, Jamie Mayerfeld, Amanda Murdie, Michael Nelson, Dan Pemstein, Keith Schnakenberg, Paul Schuler, Jaime Settle, Brigitte Seim, Tara Slough, Reed Wood, and Thorin Wright for many helpful comments and suggestions. The code and data files necessary to implement the models in R are available in Harvard Dataverse at: doi:10.7910/DVN/KWM3CY and https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/CJFariss, which can be linked to through http://cfariss.com/. This research was supported in part by the McCourtney Institute for Democracy Innovation Grant, and the College of Liberal Arts, both at Pennsylvania State University. The online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S000712341600079X.

References

Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 95 (3):529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, Benjamin, and Berliner, Daniel. 2015. The Politics of Scrutiny in Human Rights Monitoring: Evidence from Structural Topic Models of U.S. State Department Human Rights Reports. Political Science Research and Methods. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David, and Filippov, Mikhail. 2017. Problems of Model Specification and Improper Data Extrapolation. British Journal of Political Science. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500071X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., and Richards, David L.. 1999. Measuring the Level, Pattern, and Sequence of Government Respect for Physical Integrity Rights. International Studies Quarterly 43 (2):407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2013. Information Effects and Human Rights Data: Is the Good News About Increased Human Rights Information Bad News for Human Rights Measures? Human Rights Quarterly 35 (3):539–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Stafan I., Teorell, Jan, Pemstein, Daniel, Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi ting, Glynn, Adam, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, M. Steven, Hicken, Allen, McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Reif, Megan, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, and Staton, Jeffrey. 2014. V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy. Journal of Democracy 25 (3):159–169.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2017. Rescuing Human Rights Law from International Legalism and its Critics. Human Rights Quarterly 39 (1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Kristine, and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2017. Ill Treatment and Torture in Sweden: A Critique of Cross-Case Comparisons. Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2014. Respect for Human Rights Has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability in Human Rights Documents. American Political Science Review 108 (2):297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J.. 2017. Human Rights Treaty Compliance and the Changing Standard of Accountability. British Journal of Political Science (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J., Linder, Fridolin J., Jones, Zachary M., Crabtree, Charles D., Biek, Megan A., Ross, Ana-Sophia M., Kaur, Taranamol, and Tsai, Michael. 2015. Human Rights Texts: Converting Human Rights Primary Source Documents into Data. PLOS ONE 10 (9):e0138935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fariss, Christopher J, and Dancy, Geoff. Measuring the Impact of Human Rights: Conceptual and Methodological Debates. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13:TBD (November 2017). Available at http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibney, Mark, Cornett, Linda, and Wood, Reed M.. 2012. Political Terror Scale. Available from http://www.politicalterrorscale.org/.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2013. Making Human Rights a Reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology 110 (5):1373–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2007. Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law to Matter Where Needed Most. Journal of Peace Research 44 (4):407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harff, Barabara. 2003. No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder Since 1955. American Political Science Review 97 (1):57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harff, Barbara, and Gurr, Ted R.. 1988. Toward Empirical Theory of Genocides and Politicides: Identification and Measurement of Cases Since 1945. International Studies Quarterly 32 (3):359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111 (8):1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Daniel W. Jr. 2016. Democracy and the Concept of Personal Integrity Rights. Journal of Politics 78 (3):822–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Daniel W. Jr., Moore, Will H., and Mukherjee, Bumba. 2013. Information Politics v Organizational Incentives: When Are Amnesty International’s ‘Naming and Shaming’ Reports Biased? International Studies Quarterly 57 (2):219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Daniel W. Jr., and Jones, Zachary M.. 2014. An Empirical Evaluation of Explanations for State Repression. American Political Science Review 108 (3):661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyer, James R., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2011. Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? Signaling, Domestic Politics and Non-Compliance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6:275–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review 65 (3):682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMann, Kelly, Pemstein, Daniel, Seim, Brigitte, Teorell, Jan, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2016. Strategies of Validation: Assessing the Varieties of Democracy Corruption Data. Working Paper No. 23. Gothenburg, Sweden: Varieties of Democracy Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Tzelgov, Eitan, and Wang, Yi ting. 2015. Evaluating and Improving Item Response Theory Models for Cross-National Expert Sur. Working Paper No. 1. Gothenburg, Sweden: Varieties of Democracy Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Marquardt, Kyle L., Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi ting, and Miri, Farhad. 2015. The Varieties of Democracy Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data. Working Paper No. 21. Gothenburg, Sweden: Varieties of Democracy Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A. 2014. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1995. Democracy, Power, Genocide, and Mass Murder. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (1):3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnakenberg, Keith E., and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2014. Dynamic Patterns of Human Rights Practices. Political Science Research and Methods 2 (1):1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 61 (2):294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: The Norton Series in World Politics.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles Lewis, and Jodice, David A.. 1983. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators Third Edition, Vol. 2, Political Protest and Government Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Trochim, William M. K., and Donnelly, James P.. 2008. Research Methods Knowledge Base, 3rd Edition. Mason, OH: Atomic Dog.Google Scholar
Wayman, Frank W., and Tago, Atsushi. 2010. Explaining the Onset of Mass Killing, 1949–87. Journal of Peace Research 47 (1):3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Fariss Dataset

Dataset

http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KWM3CY
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Fariss supplementary material

Appendix

Download Fariss supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 5.1 MB