Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:34:36.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Populist Paradox? How Brexit Softened Anti-Immigrant Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2020

Cassilde Schwartz Open the ORCID record for Cassilde Schwartz [Opens in a new window] ,
Miranda Simon Open the ORCID record for Miranda Simon [Opens in a new window] ,
David Hudson Open the ORCID record for David Hudson [Opens in a new window]  and
Jennifer van-Heerde-Hudson
Cassilde Schwartz*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London
Miranda Simon
Affiliation:
Department of Government, University of Essex
David Hudson
Affiliation:
International Development Department, University of Birmingham
Jennifer van-Heerde-Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University College London
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent political contests across Europe and North America have been propelled by a wave of populist, anti-immigrant resentment, and it was widely expected that these populist victories would further fan the flames of xenophobia. This article reports the results of an experiment around the Brexit referendum, designed to test how populist victories shape anti-immigrant attitudes. The study finds that anti-immigrant attitudes actually softened after the Brexit referendum, among both Leave and Remain supporters, and these effects persisted for several months. How could a right-wing, populist victory soften anti-immigrant attitudes? The authors use causal mediation analysis to understand this ‘populist paradox’. Among Leavers, a greater sense of control over immigration channelled the effects of the Brexit outcome onto anti-immigrant attitudes. Individuals' efforts to distance themselves from accusations of xenophobia and racism explains the softening of attitudes towards immigration observed among both Leavers and Remainers.

Keywords

Brexitpublic opinionimmigration
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 1160 - 1180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BBC (2016) The Nigel Farage story. June. Available from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36701855.Google Scholar
Blinder, S, Ford, R and Ivarsflaten, E (2013) The better angels of our nature: how the antiprejudice norm affects policy and party preferences in Great Britain and Germany. American Journal of Political Science 57(4), 841–857.Google Scholar
Boomgaarden, HG and Vliegenthart, R (2007) Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: the role of news media content. Electoral studies 26(2), 404–417.Google Scholar
Brader, T, Valentino, NA and Suhay, E (2008) What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science 52(4), 959–978.Google Scholar
Bulman, M (2017) Brexit vote sees highest spike in religious and racial hate crimes ever recorded. July.Google Scholar
Bursztyn, L, Egorov, G and Fiorin, S (2017) From extreme to mainstream: How social norms unravel. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Charnysh, V (2018) The rise of Poland's far right: How extremism is going mainstream. December. Available from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/poland/2017-12-18/rise-polands-far-right.Google Scholar
Clarke, HD, Goodwin, M and Whiteley, P (2017) Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, HD et al. (2013) The Aid Attitudes Tracker (AAT): Great Britain Waves 5–7. Technical report, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.Google Scholar
Coenders, M et al. (2008) More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues 64(2), 269–285.Google Scholar
Cooper, C (2016) Xenophobia has become the new normal – and these poisonous ideas won't go away after the referendum. June. Available from https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/eu-referendum-brexit-immigration-xenophobia-new-normal-debate-nigel-farage-david-cameron-a7095371.html.Google Scholar
Czopp, AM and Monteith, MJ (2003) Confronting prejudice (literally): reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(4), 532–544.Google ScholarPubMed
Daily Mail (2016) A time to pay tribute to the courage and wisdom of the people. 25 June 2016.Google Scholar
Devine, PG (1989) Stereotypes and prejudices: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
Devine, PG et al. (1991) Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(6), 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, CE (2017) Benchmarking Brexit: how the British decision to leave shapes EU public opinion. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55(Suppl 1), 38–53.Google Scholar
Dodd, V (2018) Brexit will trigger rise in hate crimes, warns police watchdog. July.Google Scholar
Dovidio, JF and Gaertner, SL (2004) Aversive racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 36, 4–56.Google Scholar
Esses, VM, Jackson, LM and Armstrong, TL (1998) Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: an instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues 54(4), 699–724.Google Scholar
Evans, G and Mellon, J (2019) Immigration, Euroscepticism, and the rise and fall of UKIP. Party Politics 25(1), 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, RH et al. (1986) On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(2), 229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, SD and Renwick, A (2018) The UK's referendum on EU membership of June 2016: how expectations of Brexit's impact affected the outcome. Acta Politica 53(4), 590–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, R (2018) How have attitudes to immigration changed since Brexit? Medium.Google Scholar
Ford, R and Goodwin, M (2017) Britain after Brexit: a nation divided. Journal of Democracy 28(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
Galston, WA (2018) The rise of European populism and the collapse of the center-left. March. Available from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/03/08/the-rise-of-european-populism-and-the-collapse-of-the-center-left/.Google Scholar
Gibson, JL (1998) A sober second thought: an experiment in persuading Russians to tolerate. American Journal of Political Science 42(3), 819–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, JL and Gouws, A (2005) Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M and Milazzo, C (2017) Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(3), 450–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, MJ and Heath, O (2016) The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: an aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly 87(3), 323–332.Google Scholar
Greenaway, KH et al. (2014) Perceived control qualifies the effects of threat on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology 53(3), 422–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hainmueller, J and Hiscox, MJ (2010) Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review 104(1), 61–84.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J and Hopkins, DJ (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J and Hopkins, DJ (2015) The hidden American immigration consensus: a conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. American Journal of Political Science 59(3), 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harell, A, Soroka, S and Iyengar, S (2017) Locus of control and anti-immigrant sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology 38(2), 245–260.Google Scholar
Harteveld, E and Ivarsflaten, E (2018) Why women avoid the radical right: internalized norms and party reputations. British Journal of Political Science 48(2), 369–384.Google Scholar
Harteveld, E, Kokkonen, A and Dahlberg, S (2017) Adapting to party lines: the effect of party affiliation on attitudes to immigration. West European Politics 40(6), 1177–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, SB (2016) The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy 23(9), 1259–1277.Google Scholar
Holleran, M (2018) The opportunistic rise of Europe's far right. February. Available from https://newrepublic.com/article/147102/opportunistic-rise-europes-far-right.Google Scholar
Hopkins, DJ (2010) Politicized places: explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review 104(1), 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iakhnis, E et al. (2018) Populist referendum: was ‘Brexit’ an expression of nativist and anti-elitist sentiment? Research & Politics. Doi: doi.org/10.1177/2053168018773964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K, Keele, L and Tingley, D (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods 15(4), 309–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, K et al. (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review 105(4), 765–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K et al. (2010) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science 25(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R and Norris, P (2017) Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: the silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics 15(2), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ipsos MORI (2017) Shifting Ground: 8 Key Findings from a Longitudinal Study on Attitudes Towards Immigration and Brexit. London: Ipsos MORI.Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E (2005) Threatened by diversity: why restrictive asylum and immigration policies appeal to Western Europeans. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15(1), 20–45.Google Scholar
John, T (2016) Surge in hate crimes in the U.K. following U.K.'s Brexit vote. June.Google Scholar
Judge, TA et al. (2002) Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(3), 693–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreuter, F, Presser, S and Tourangeau, R (2008) Social desirability bias in cati, ivr, and web surveys the effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5), 847–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, JH et al. (1991) The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science 35(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Lahav, G (2004) Public opinion toward immigration in the European Union: does it matter? Comparative Political Studies 37(10), 1151–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N and Krosnick, JA (2007) The effect of survey mode and sampling on inferences about political attitudes and behavior: comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to internet surveys with nonprobability samples. Political Analysis 15(3), 286–323.Google Scholar
Malhotra, N, Margalit, Y and Mo, CH (2013) Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. American Journal of Political Science 57(2), 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, AM (2006) Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3), 510–530.Google Scholar
McGurn, W (2016) Who's the xenophobe now? The anti-Trump and anti-Brexit forces share a snobbery towards ordinary voters. Wall Street Journal, 27 June.Google Scholar
Miliband, D (2016) Did the Syrian refugee crisis help lead to Brexit? Meet the Press. 26 June 2016.Google Scholar
Monteith, MJ et al. (2002) Putting the brakes on prejudice: on the development and operation of cues for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(5), 1029–1050.Google ScholarPubMed
Moore, M and Ramsay, G (2017) UK Media Coverage of the 2016 EU Referendum Campaign. London: The Policy Institute at King's.Google Scholar
Moss-Racusin, C, Phelan, J and Rudman, L (2010) ‘I'm not prejudiced, but…’: compensatory egalitarianism in the 2008 democratic presidential primary. Political Psychology 31(4), 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Vol 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C (2013) Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what? European Journal of Political Research 52(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C (2015) Populist radical right parties in Europe today. In Transformations of Populism in Europe and the Americas: History and Recent Trends. Abromeit, J et al. . (eds). London: Bloomsbury, pp. 295–307.Google Scholar
Muñoz, J, Falcó-Gimeno, A and Hernández, E (2019) Unexpected event during surveys design: Promise and pitfalls for causal inference. Political Analysis 1–21.Google Scholar
Mutz, DC (2018) Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201718155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, C, Mellon, J and Green, J (2016) What mattered most to you when deciding how to vote in the EU referendum. British Election Study 11.Google Scholar
Ramesh, R (2016) Racism is spreading like arsenic through the water supply. The Guardian, 28 June. Available from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/28/racism-neo-nazis-britain.Google Scholar
Riek, BM, Mania, EW and Gaertner, SL (2006) Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(4), 336–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rooduijn, M, Van der Brug, W and De Lange, SL (2016) Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies 43, 32–40.Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M et al. (2017) Persuasive populism? Estimating the effect of populist messages on political cynicism. Politics and Governance 5(4), 136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, ZK et al. (2012) A dual-motive model of scapegoating: displacing blame to reduce guilt or increase control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102(6), 1148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheve, KF and Slaughter, MJ (2001) Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(1), 133–145.Google Scholar
Schwartz, C, Simon, M, Hudson, D and Vanhheerde-Hudson, J (2019) Replication Data For: A Populist Paradox? How Brexit Softened Anti-Immigrant Attitudes, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EJWXAO, Harvard Dataverse, V1.Google Scholar
Sharman, J and Jones, I (2017) Hate crimes rise by up to 100 per cent across England and Wales, figures reveal. The Independent. 15 February.Google Scholar
Sniderman, PM, Hagendoorn, A and Hagendoorn, L (2007) When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and its Discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, PM, Hagendoorn, L and Prior, M (2004) Predisposing factors and situational triggers: exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review 98(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville, W (2016) Brexit: The role of migration in the upcoming EU referendum. Migration Policy Institute, 4 May. Available from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/brexit-role-migration-upcoming-eu-referendum.Google Scholar
Sommers, J (2016) Nigel Farage slated by pro-EU Ken Clarke over infamous ‘breaking point’ refugee poster. Huffington Post, 12 May. Available from https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/nigel-farage-ken-clarke-breaking-point-poster_uk_5845c1c5e4b07ac7244927eb.Google Scholar
Stephan, WG, Ybarra, O and Bachman, G (1999) Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(11), 2221–2237.Google Scholar
Stouffer, SA (1955) Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks its Mind. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulou, S (2016) UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit referendum. The Political Quarterly 87(2), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, A (2016) Brexit was motivated by fear of foreigners. Now it'll get worse. June.Google Scholar
Wright, M, Levy, M and Citrin, J (2016) Public attitudes toward immigration policy across the legal/illegal divide: the role of categorical and attribute-based decision-making. Political Behavior 38(1), 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Schwartz et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EJWXAO
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Schwartz et al. supplementary material

Online Appendices

Download Schwartz et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 458.9 KB