Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:29:19.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Ecology and the Social Sciences – The State of the Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Philip D. Lowe  and
Wolfgang Rüdig
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The ‘environment’ as a political issue has had a mixed history. Its sudden upsurge in the late 1960s was followed by many ups and downs. It has, however, continued to press itself on to the political agenda in various forms. Most recently, the rise of green parties in Western Europe has demonstrated that the environment is not one of many issues which come and go but has led to more fundamental political change.

Type
Review Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1986 , pp. 513 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, B. G. and Huveröd, S. H., eds, 1979, Kampen för miljön: En lägesrapport om miljörörelser (Göteborg, Sweden: Centrum för Tvarvetenskap, Göteborgs Universitet).Google Scholar
Apter, D. E. and Sawa, N., 1984, Against the State: Politics and Social Protest in Japan (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ashby, E. and Anderson, M., 1981, The Politics of Clean Air (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M., 1970, Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bailes, K. E., ed., 1985, Environmental History: Critical Issues in Comparative Perspective (Lanham: University Press of America).Google Scholar
Barker, A. and Keating, M., 1977, ‘Public Spirits: Amenity Societies and Others’, pp. 202–21 of Crouch, C., ed., Participation in Politics, British Political Sociology Yearbook, Vol. 3 (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Barnes, B., 1982, T. S. Kuhn and Social Science (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, S. H. and Kaase, M. et al. , 1979, Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies (Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage).Google Scholar
Berger, S., 1979, ‘Politics and Antipolitics in Western Europe in the Seventies’, Daedalus, CVIII, 27–50.Google Scholar
Beywl, W. and Brombach, H., 1984, ‘Selstorganisationen’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, no. 11, 15–29.Google Scholar
Blowers, A., 1984, Something in the Air: Corporate Powers and the Environment (London: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Böltken, F. and Jagodzinski, W., 1985, ‘In an Environment of Insecurity: Post Materialism in the European Community 1970–1980’, Comparative Political Studies, XVII, 453–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boy, D., 1981, ‘Le vote ecologiste en 1978’, Revue Française de Science Politique, XXXI, 394–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, G., 1978, Nuclear Power: The Windscale Controversy, Control of Technology, Unit 5 (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).Google Scholar
Brand, K.-W., 1982, Neue soziale Bewegungen: Entstehung, Funktion and Perspektive neuer Protestpotentiale (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, K.-W., ed., 1985, Neue soziale Bewegungen in Westeuropa und den USA (Frankfurt: Campus).Google Scholar
Brand, K.-W., Büsser, D., and Rucht, D., 1983, Aufbruch in eine andere Gesellschaft: Neue soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik (Frankfurt: Campus).Google Scholar
Bridgeford, J., 1978, ‘The Ecologist Movement and the French General Election 1978’, Parliamentary Affairs, XXXI, 314–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeford, J., 1981, ‘Die Grüne Partei and the West German Federal Elections’, Quinquereme, IV, 181–95.Google Scholar
Brodeur, P., 1973, Expendable Americans (New York: Viking).Google Scholar
Bruce-Briggs, B., ed., 1979, The New Class? (New Brunswick; Transaction Books).Google Scholar
Brun, R., ed., 1978, Der grüne Protest: Herausforderung durch die Umweltparteien (Frankfurt: Fischer).Google Scholar
Bürklin, W. P., 1981, ‘Die Grünen and die ‘Neue Politik’: Abschied vom Dreiparteiensystem?’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, XXII, 359–82.Google Scholar
Bürklin, W. P., 1983, ‘Ansatzpunkte einer sozialstrukturellen Verankerung der neuen sozialen Bewegung’, paper presented at the Congress of the German Political Science Association, Mannheim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürklin, W. P., 1985, ‘The Grünen: Ecology and the New Left’, in Wallach, H. G. and Romoser, G. K., eds, West German Politics in the Mid-Eighties: Crisis and Continuity (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar
Buttel, F. H. and Flinn, W. L., 1976, ‘Environmental Politics: The Structuring of Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Mass Environmental Attitudes’, Sociological Quarterly, XVII, 477–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttel, F. H. and Flinn, W. L., 1978, ‘Social Classes and Mass Environmental Beliefs: A Reconsideration’, Environment and Behavior, X, 433–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilleri, J. A., 1978, ‘Ecological Politics: The Birth of a New Movement’, World Review, XVII, 45–59.Google Scholar
Camilleri, J. A., 1984, The State and Nuclear Power: Conflict and Control in the Western World (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
Capra, F. and Spretnak, C., 1984, Green Politics (New York: E. P. Dutton).Google Scholar
Casper, B. M. and Wellstone, P. D., 1981, Powerline: The First Battle of America's Energy War (Amherst: University of Massachusetts press).Google Scholar
Chafer, T. 1983, ‘The Greens and the Municipal Elections’, Newsletter of the Association for the Study of Modern and Contemporary France, No. 14, 11–16.Google Scholar
Chafer, T. 1984, ‘The Greens in France: An Emerging Social Movement?’, Journal of Area Studies, No. 10, 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civic Trust and Barker, A., 1976, The Local Amenity Movement (London: Civic Trust).Google Scholar
Cohen, E. M., 1981, ‘Ideology, Interest Group Formation and Protest: The Case of the Anti-Nuclear Movement, the Clamshell Alliance and the New Left’ (doctoral dissertation, Harvard University).Google Scholar
Conrad, J. and Krebsbach-Gnath, C., 1981, Die Kernenergickontroverse im international Vergleich', pp. 62–79 of Krebsbach-Gnath, C., ed., Konfliktefeld Energic (Munich: Oldenbourg).Google Scholar
C, Conti, 1984, Abschied vom Bürgertum: Alternative Bewegungen in Deutschland von 1890 bis heute (Reinbek: Rowohlt).Google Scholar
Cotgrove, S., 1982, Catastrophe or Cornucopia; The Environment, Politics and the Future (Chicester: Wiley).Google Scholar
Cotgrove, S. and Duff, A., 1980, ‘Environmentalism, Middle-Class Radicalism and Politics’, Sociological Review, XXVIII, 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotgrove, S. and Duff, A., 1981, ‘Environmentalism, Values and Social Change’, British Journal of Sociology, XXXII, 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenson, M. A., 1971, The Un-politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-decision making in the Cities (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Crompton, R. and Gubbay, J., 1977, Economy and Class Structure (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabelko, D. D., 1981, ‘Political Aspects of Environmental Quality’, Environment and Behavior, XIII, 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Roose, F., 1984, ‘De Groene Golf: Over de nationale diversiteit van een internationaal fenomeen’, p. 33–61 of W. De Backer, F. De Roose and P. Florizoone, De Groene Golf (Eeklo, Belgium: De Groenen).Google Scholar
Deschouwer, K. and Stouthuysen, P. E., 1984, ‘L'electorat d'AGALEV’, Courrier Hebdomadaire du Centre de Recherche et d'Information Socio-politiques, no. 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devall, W., 1970, ‘The Governing of a Voluntary Organization: Oligarchy and Democracy in the Sierra Club’, (doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon).Google Scholar
Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A., 1982, Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Downing, P. B., 1982, ‘Cross-National Comparisons in Environmental Protection: Introduction to the Issues’, Policy Studies Journal, XI, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A., 1972, ‘Up and Down with Ecology – The Issue-Attention Cycle’, The Public Interest, XXVIII, 38–50.Google Scholar
Duclos, D. H. and Smadja, J. J., 1985, ‘Culture and the Environment in France’, Environmental Management, IX, 135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R. E., 1975, ‘The Impact of Political Orientation on Environmental Attitudes and Actions’, Environment and Behavior, VII, 384–97.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. and Catton, W. R., 1980, ‘A New Ecological Paradigm for Post- Exuberant Sociology’, American Behavioral Scientist, XXIV, 514.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D., 1978a, Environmental Concern: A Bibliography and Brief Appraisal of the Literature, Public Administration Series P-44 (Monticello, Ill.: Vance Bibliogaphies).Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D., 1978b, ‘The “New Environmental Paradigm”: A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results’, Journal of Environmental Education, IX, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, T. R., 1981, DDT: Scientists, Citizens, and Public Policy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Dye, T. R., 1976, Policy Analaysis: What Governments Do, Why They Do It, and What Difference It Makes (University: University of Alabama Press).Google Scholar
Ebert, T., Sternstein, W. and Vogt, R., 1978, Ökologiebewegung und ziviler Widerstand: Wyhler Erfahrungen, Aktionsforscher berichten (Stuttgart: Umweltwissenschaftliches Institut).Google Scholar
Edelman, M., 1964, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar
Edelman, M., 1971, Politics as Symbolic Action (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Edelman, M., 1977, Political Language: Words that Succeed and Politics that Fail (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Egginton, J., 1980, The Poisoning of Michigan (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Ely, J., 1983, ‘The Greens: Ecology and the Promise of Radical Democracy’, Radical America, XVII, 23–34.Google Scholar
Enloe, C. E., 1975, The Politics of Pollution in a Comparative Perspective: Ecology and Power in Four Nations (New York: Longman).Google Scholar
Evans, G. W. and Jacobs, S. V., 1981, ‘Air Pollution and Human Behavior’, Journal of Social Issues, XXXVII, 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J., 1982, Global Fission: The Battle over Nuclear Power (Melbourne: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Feldman, E. J. and Milch, J., 1982, Technocracy versus Democracy: The Comparative Politics of International Airports (Boston, Mass.: Auburn House).Google Scholar
Fietkau, H.-J., 1981, Umweltbewuβtsein: Stand, Artikulationsformen und Veränderungsmöglichkeiten (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Fietkau, H.-J., 1982a, Neue Werte aus handlungstheoretischer Sicht (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Fietkau, H.-J., 1982b, Ökologisches Denken in westlichen Industrienationen: Eine 1980 durchgeführte Studie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, England und USA (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Fietkau, H.-J., Hassebrauck, M. and Watts, N., 1981a, Der Internationale Umweltfragebogen (IUF): Ein Instrumentarium zur Erfassung umeltbezogener Werte (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Fietkau, H.-J., Watts, N., Hassebrauck, M., Voigt, M. and Tischler, W., 1981b, Umweltbewuβtsein im internationalen Vergleich: Das ‘International Environment Survey’, Methodische Entwicklung and Ergebnisse, Berlin, Bath und Buffalo 1979 (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Fietkau, H.-J., Kessel, H., and Tischler, W., 1982a, Umwelt im Spiegel der öffentlichen Meinung (Frankfurt: Campus).Google Scholar
Fietkau, H.-J., Kessel, H., Coopersmith, J. and Milbrath, L. W., 1982b, Restructuring Cognitions and Values in Revolutionary Social Change (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Flanagan, S. C., 1982, ‘Changing Values in Advanced Industrial Societies: Inglehart's Silent Revolution from the Perspective of Japanese Findings’, Comparative Political Studies, XIV, 403–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, R. S., 1983, ‘Attitudes Towards Industrial Pollution, Strategies for Protecting the Environment, and Environmental-Economic Trade-Offs’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, XIII, 310–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankland, E. G., 1981, ‘Ecology, Ideology and Party Politics: A Comparative Perspective’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Newark, N.J.Google Scholar
Frankland, E. G., 1983a, ‘The Dynamics of the West German Party System: A Study of the Greens’, paper presented at the 41st annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Frankland, E. G., 1983b, ‘Interpreting the ‘Green’ Phenomenon in West German Politics, 1977–1983’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Frankland, E. G., 1985, ‘The Greens: Parliamentary Challenges and Responses’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Gladwin, T. N., 1980, ‘Patterns of Environmental Conflict over Industrial Facilities in the United States’, Natural Resources Journal, XX, 243–74.Google Scholar
Gladwin, T. N. and Walter, I., 1980, Multinationals under Fire: Lessons in the Management of Conflict (New York: Wiley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, A. W., 1979, The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R., 1971, The Price of Amenity (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Gyorgy, A. et al. , 1979, No Nukes: Everyone's Guide to Nuclear Power (Boston, Mass.: South End Press).Google Scholar
Hall, I. M., 1976, Community Action versus Pollution: A Study of a Residents' Group in a Welsh Urban Area (Cardiff: University of Wales Press).Google Scholar
Hallensleben, A., 1984, Von der Grünen Liste zur Grünen Partei? Die Entwicklung der Grünen Liste Umweltschutz von ihrer Etstehung in Niedersachsen 1977 bis zur Gründung der Partei Die Grünen 1980 (Göttingen: Muster-Schmidt Verlag).Google Scholar
Handley, D. and Watts, N., 1981, ‘Political Psychology and Environmentalist Politics’, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik, IV, 295–320.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K., 1984, Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, S. P., 1958, Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hays, S. P., forthcoming, Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985 (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Heberlein, T. A., 1981, ‘Environmental Attitudes’, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik, IV, 241–70.Google Scholar
Herz, T., 1979, ‘Der Wandel von Wertvorstellungen in westlichen Industriegesellschaften’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie and Sozialpsychologie, XXXI, 282–302.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, K. and Dalton, R. J., 1977, ‘Die neue Politik: Politischer Wandel Oder Schönwetterpolitik?’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, XVIII, 230–56. (English translation: ‘The New Politics: Political Change or Sunshine Politics?’ pp. 69–96 of M. Kaase and K. von Beyme, eds., Elections and Parties (German Political Studies, Vol. 3) Beverly Hills: Sage, 1978.Google Scholar
Holdren, J. P., 1983, ‘The Risk Assessors’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, IXL (6), 33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, T. C., Ladd, A. E. and Van Liere, K. D., 1982, ‘Newcomers, Short-Termers, and Old-timers: Ideology and Participation in the Anti-Nuclear Rally’, paper presented at the Society for the Study of Social Problems Meeting, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hornback, K. E., 1974, ‘Orbits of Opinion: The Role of Age in the Environmental Movement's Attentive Public’ (doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1971, ‘The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies’, American Political Science Review, LLXV, 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1977, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1979, ‘Wertwandel in den westlichen Industriegesellschaften: Politische Konsequenzen von materialistischen und post-materialistischen Prioritäten’, pp. 279–316 of H. Klages and P. Kmieciak, eds, op. cit.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1981, ‘Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity’, American Political Science Review, LXXXV, 880–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1982, Changing Values and the Rise of Environmentalism in Western Societies (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1983a, ‘Traditionelle politische Trennungslinien und die Entwicklung der neuen Politik in westlichen Gesellschaften’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, XXIV, 139–65.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1983b, ‘The Persistence of Materialist and Post-Materialist Value Orientations: Comments on Van Deth's Analysis’, European Journal of Political Research, XI, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1985a, ‘New Perspectives on Value Change: Response to Lafferty and Knutsen, Savage, and Böltken and Jagodzinski’, Comparative Political Studies, XVII, 485–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., 1985b, ‘Aggregate Stability and Individual-Level Flux in Mass Belief Systems: The Level of Analysis Paradox’, American Political Science Review, LXXIX, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, L. E. Mutras, and Stryker, S., 1980, ‘Political Protest Orientations among Black and White Adults’, American Sociological Review, XLV, 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagodzinski, W., 1983, ‘Materialism in Japan Reconsidered: Toward a Synthesis of Generational and Life-Cycle Explanations’, American Political Science Review, LXXVII, 887–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. J., 1980, ‘Social Credit and the Values party’, pp. 148–167 of Penniman, H. R., ed., New Zealand at the Polls: The General Election of 1978 (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research).Google Scholar
Jänicke, M., 1978, ‘Blauer Himmel über den Industriestädten – eine Optische Täuschung’, pp. 150–65 of Jänicke, M., ed., Umweltpolitik; Beiträge zur Politologie des Umweltschutzes (opladen: Leske Verlag + Budrich GmbH).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jänicke, M., 1979, Wie das Industriesystem von seinen Miβständen profitiert (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jänicke, M., 1985, Preventive Environmental Policy as Ecological Modernisation and Structural Policy (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Kazis, R. and Grossman, R. L., 1982, Fear at Work: Job Blackmail, Labor, and the Environment (New York: Pilgrim Press).Google Scholar
Kelley, D. R., Stunkel, K. R. and Wescott, R. R., 1976, The Economic Superpowers and the Environment: The United States, the Soviet Union and Japan (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman).Google Scholar
Kessel, H., 1982, Comparing Ecological Awareness in Developed Countries (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Kessel, H., 1983a, Aspekte des ö;kologischen Bewuβtseins, Ein Vergleich von: Bundesrepublik Deutschland, USA and England (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Kessel, H., 1983b, Umweltprobleme: Wahrgenommene Zukunftschancen (Berlin- International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Kessel, H., 1983c, Stand und Veränderung des Umwelt-Bewuβtseins in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, England und den Vereinigten Staaten: Bericht aus einem laufenden Forschungsprojekt (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Kiersch, G. and von Oppeln, S., 1983, Kernenergiekonflikt in Frankreich und Deutschland (Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Autoren-Verlag).Google Scholar
Kimber, R. and Richardson, J. J., eds, 1974, Campaigning for the Environment (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., 1983, ‘Policy Impacts of Anti-Nuclear Movements: Comparative Perspectives’, paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of Europeanists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., 1985, ‘New Social Movements in West Germany and the United States’, Political Power and Social Theory, V (in press).Google Scholar
Klages, H. and Kmieciak, P., eds, 1979, Wertwandel und gesellschaftlicher Wandel (Frankfurt: Campus).Google Scholar
Klotsch, L. and Stöss, R., 1984, ‘Die Grünen’, pp. 1509–98 of Stöss, R., ed, Parteien- Handbuch: Die Parteien der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1945–1980 Vol. 2 (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).Google Scholar
Kluge, T., ed., 1984, Grüne Politik: Eine Standortbestimmung (Frankfurt: Fischer).Google Scholar
Knoepfel, P. and Weidner, H., 1980, Handbuch der SO2-Luftreinhaltepolitik, 2 vols (Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag).Google Scholar
Knoepfel, P. and Weidner, H., 1982, ‘Formulation and Implementation of Air Quality Control Programmes: Interest Recognition Patterns’, Policy and Politics, X, 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, W., 1960, The Politics of Mass Society (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Kramer, D. et al. , 1979, ‘Aktionsforschung: Sozialforschung und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit’, pp. 21–40 of Horn, K., ed, Aktionsforschung: Balanceakt ohne Netz? (Frankfurt: Syndikat).Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., 1981, AKW-Gegner in der Schweiz: Eine Fallstudie zum Aufbau des Widerstands gegen des geplante AKW in Graben (Diessenhofen, Switzerland: Verlag Rüegger).Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Levy, R., Gauguillet, G. and Zwicky, H., eds, 1981, Politische Aktivierung in der Schweiz, 1945–1978 (Diessenhofen, Switzerland: Verlag Rüegger).Google Scholar
Krümpelmann, B. et al. , 1978, Atomenergie International: Atomprogramme und Widerstand in 28 Ländern (Bochum: Projektbereich Ökologie der Vereinigten Deutschen Studentenschaften).Google Scholar
Kumar, K., 1978, Prophecy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and Post- Industrial Society (Harmbndsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H. C. and Linneroothe, J. et al. , 1983, Risk Analysis and Decision Processes: The Siting of Liquified Energy Gas Facilities in Four Countries (Berlin: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küppers, G., Lundgreen, P. and Weingart, P., 1978, Umweltforschung – die gesteuerte Wissenschaft? (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Ladd, A. E., Hood, T. C. and Van Liere, K. D., 1983, ‘Ideological Themes in the Anti-nuclear Movement: Consensus and Diversity’, Sociological Inquiry, LIII, 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafferty, W. M., 1976, ‘Basic Needs and Political Values: Some Perspectives from Norway on Europe's “Silent Revolution”’, Acta Sociologica, XIX, 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, L. M., 1983, ‘The Environmental Mandate: Activists and the Electorate’, Political Science Quarterly, XCVIII, 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, F., 1979, ‘Die ‘Stille Revolution’: Zur Theorie und Realität des Wertewandels in hochindustrialisierten Gesellschaften’, pp. 317–27 of H. Klages and P. Kmieciak, eds, op. cit.Google Scholar
Lemkov, L., 1984. La Protesta Antinuclear (Madrid: Editorial Mezquita).Google Scholar
Lemkov, L. and Buttel, F., 1983, Los Movimientos Ecologistas (Madrid: Editorial Mezquita).Google Scholar
Levy, R., 1981, ‘Politische Basisaktivität im Bereich der Umweltproblematik’, Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Politische Wissenschaft, XXI, 9–37.Google Scholar
Lowe, G. D., Pinhey, T. K. and Grimes, M. D., 1980, ‘Public Support for Environmental Protection: New Evidence from National Surveys’, Pacific Sociological Review, XXIII, 423–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, P. D., 1977, ‘Amenity and Equity: A Review of Local Environmental Pressure Groups in Britain’, Environment and Planning A, IX, 39–58.Google Scholar
Lowe, P. D., 1983, ‘Values and Institutions in the History of British Nature Conservation’, pp. 329–52 of Warren, A. and Goldsmith, F. B., eds, Conservation in Perspective (Chichester: Wiley).Google Scholar
Lowe, P. D., Cox, G., MacEwen, M., O'Riordan, T. and Winter, M., 1985, Cultivating Conflict: The Politics of Farming, Forestry and Conservation (London: Gower).Google Scholar
Lowe, P. D. and Goyder, J. M., 1983, Environmental Groups in Politics (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Lowe, P. D. and Morrison, D., 1984, ‘Bad News or Good News: Environmental Politics and the Mass Media’, Sociological Review, XXXII, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, P. D. and Rüdig, W., 1985, ‘Environmental Interest Groups and Government in Britain’ in Knoepfel, P. and Watts, N., eds, Environmental Politics and Policies (London: Harper & Row), in press.Google Scholar
Lukes, S., 1974, Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundqvist, L. J., 1974, Environmental Policies in Canada, Sweden and the United States: A Comparative Overview (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage).Google Scholar
Lundqvist, L. J., 1978, ‘The Comparative Study of Environmental Politics: From Garbage to Gold?’ International Journal of Environmental Studies, XII, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundqvist, L. J., 1980, The Hare and the Tortoise: Clean Air Policies in the U.S. and Sweden (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
McCulloch, A., 1983, ‘The Ecology Party and Constituency Politics: The Anatomy of a Grassroots Party’, paper presented at the Political Studies Association conference, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
McKean, M. A., 1981, Environmental Protest and Citizen Politics in Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKean, M. A., 1983, ‘The Evolution of Japanese Images of the Environment’, paper presented at the Sixth Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Oxford.Google Scholar
Malkis, A. and Grasmick, H. G., 1977, ‘Support for the Ideology of the Environmental Movement: Tests of Alternative Hypotheses’, Western Sociological Review, VIII, 25–47.Google Scholar
Mann, D. E. ed., 1981, Environmental Policy Formation, Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Marsh, A., 1981, ‘Environmental Issues in Contemporary European Politics’, pp. 121–54 of G. T. Goodman et al., The European Transition from Oil: Societal Impacts and Constraints on Energy Policy (London: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Marsh, D., ed., 1983, Pressure Politics (London: Junction Books).Google Scholar
Marsh, J., 1982, Back to the Land: The Pastoral Impulse in Victorian England from 1880 to 1940 (London: Quartet Books).Google Scholar
Mazur, A., 1975, ‘Opposition to Technological Innovation’, Minerva, XIII, 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettke, J. R., ed., 1982, Die Grünen: Regierungspartner von morgen? (Reinbek: Rowohlt).Google Scholar
Mewes, H., 1983, ‘The West German Green Party’, New German Critique, XXVIII, 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mez, L., ed., 1979, Der Atomkonflikt: Atomindustrie, Atompolitik und Anti-Atom-Bewegung im internationalen Vergleich (Berlin: Olle & Wolter).Google Scholar
Mez, L. and Wolter, U., eds, 1980, Die Qual der Wahl: Ein Wegweiser durch die Parteienlandschaft zur Bundestagswahl 1980 (Berlin: Olle & Wolter).Google Scholar
Milbrath, L. W., 1981, ‘Environmental Values and Beliefs of the General Public and Leaders in the United States, England and Germany’, pp. 43–61 of D. E. Mann, ed., op. cit.Google Scholar
Milbrath, L. W., 1984, Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. C., 1979a, ‘Silent Spring/Solid Majorities’, Public Opinion, 08/09, 16–20, 55.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. C., 1979b, ‘National Environmental Lobbies and the Apparent Illogic of Collective Action’, pp. 87–136 of Russell, C. S., ed., Collective Decision Making: Applications from Public Choice Theory (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. C., 1984, ‘Public Opinion and Environmental Politics in the 1970s and 1980s’ in Vig, N. J. and Kraft, M. E., eds, Environmental Policy in the 1980s (Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. C. and Davies, J. C. III, 1978, The United States Environmental Movement and its Historical Context, Discussion Paper D-32 (Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future).Google Scholar
Morrison, D. E., Hornback, K. E. and Warner, W. K., 1972, ‘The Environmental Movement: Some Preliminary Observations and Predictions’, pp. 259–79 of Burch, W. R., Cheek, N. H., and Taylor, L., eds, Social Behavior, Natural Resources and the Environment (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Morrison, D. E. and Dunlap, R. E., 1985, ‘Is Environmentalism Elitist?’ in Buttel, F. H. and Humphrey, C. R., eds, Environment and Society (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F., 1982a, ‘Ecology Parties in Western Europe’, West European Politics, V, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F. 1982b, ‘“Parteien neuen Typs” in Westeuropa: Eine vergleichende Analyse’, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, XIII, 369–90.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F., 1983a, ‘Die Postmaterialismusdiskussion in der empirischen Sozialforschung: Politisch und wissenschaftlich überlebt oder noch immer zukunftsweisend?’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, XXIV, 218–28.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F., 1983b, ‘Zur elektoralen Verankerung der neuen sozialen Bewegungen’, paper presented at the congress of the German Political Science Association, Mannheim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F., 1984a, ‘Zum Verhältnis von neuen sozialen Bewegungen und neuen Konfliktdimensionen in den politischen Systemen Westeuropas: Eine empirische Analyse’, Journal für Sozialforschung, XXIV, 441–54.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F., 1984b, ‘Die Grünen im Lichte von neuesten Ergebnissen der Wahlforschung’, in T. Kluge, ed., op. cit.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F., 1985, ‘New Social Movements and Smaller Parties: A Comparative Analysis’, West European Politics, VIII, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F. and Wilke, H., 1981, ‘Sozialstruktur und “postmaterialistische” Wertorientierungen von Ökologisten: Eine empirische Analyse am Beispiel Frankreichs’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, XXII, 383–97.Google Scholar
Mushaben, J. M., 1983, ‘Innocence Lost: Environmental Images and Political Experiences among West German “Greens”’, paper presented at the Sixth Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mutch, W. E. S., 1977, ‘The Expansion of Turnhouse, Edinburgh Airport’, pp. 44–58 of Sewell, W. R. D. and Coppock, J. T., eds, Public Participation in Planning (Chichester: Wiley).Google Scholar
Nash, R., 1967, Wilderness and the American Mind (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Nelkin, D., 1977, Technological Decisions and Democracy: European Experiments in Public Participation (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage).Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. and Brown, M., 1984, Workers at Risk: Voices from the Workplace (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. and Pollak, M., 1981, The Atom Besieged: Extra-parliamentary Dissent in France and Germany (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Nullmeier, F., Rubart, F. and Schultz, H., 1983, Umweltbewegungen und Parteiensystem: Umweltgruppen und Umweltparteien in Frankreich und Schweden (Berlin: Quorum).Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P., 1977, Organisational Participation in Government (Bergen: University of Bergen).Google Scholar
Olson, M., 1971, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, rev. edn (New York: Schocken).Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T., 1979, ‘Public Interest Environmental Groups in the United States and Britain’, Journal of American Studies, XIII, 409–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Riordan, T., 1981, Environmentalism, 2nd edn (London: Pion).Google Scholar
Papadakis, E., 1984, The Green Movement in West Germany (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Parkin, F., 1968, Middle Class Radicalism: The Social Bases of the British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
Parkin, F., 1979, Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique (London: Tavistock Publications).Google Scholar
Pepper, D., 1984, The Roots of Modern Environmentalism (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Pilat, J. F., 1980, Ecological Politics: The Rise of the Green Movement (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage).Google Scholar
Pilat, J. F., 1983, ‘Whither the West German Greens?’ Contemporary Review, CCVLII, 292–7.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N., 1975, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism (London: New Left Books).Google Scholar
Prescott-Clarke, P., 1982, Public Attitudes towards Industrial, Work-related and Other Risks (London: Social and Community Planning Research).Google Scholar
Pridham, G., 1978, ‘Ecologists in Politics: The West German Case’, Parliamentary Affairs, XXXI, 436–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rammstedt, O., 1978, Soziale Bewegung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen, 1978, Umweltgutachten 1978 (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer).Google Scholar
Reich, M. R., 1981, ‘Toxic Politics: A Comparative Study of Public and Private Responses to Chemical Disasters in the United States, Italy, and Japan (doctoral dissertation, Yale University).Google Scholar
Reich, M. R., 1984, ‘Mobilizing for Environmental Policy in Italy and Japan’, Comparative Politics, XVI, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G., 1982, Policing Pollution: A Study of Regulation and Enforcement (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Richardson, J. J., ed., 1982, Policy Styles in Western Europe (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Richardson, J. J. and Jordan, A. G., 1979, Governing under Pressure: The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy (Oxford: Martin Robertson).Google Scholar
Rickwood, P. W., 1973, ‘Public Enjoyment of the Open Countryside in England and Wales, 1919–1939’ (doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).Google Scholar
Roddewig, R. J., 1978, Green Bans (Montclair, N.J.: Allenheld Osmun/Universe).Google Scholar
Rothschuh, K. E., 1983, Naturheilbewegung, Reformbewegung, Alternativbewegung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Rüdig, W., 1981, ‘Public Participation and Nuclear Power Polities’, Politics, 1, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüdig, W., 1983a, ‘Clustered Nuclear Siting and Anti-Nuclear Opposition’, paper presented to the Sixth Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rüdig, W., 1983b, ‘The Greening of Germany’, The Ecologist, XIII, No. 1, 35–9.Google Scholar
Rüdig, W., 1985a, ‘The Dutch and French Greens in the European Elections 1984: Case Studies in Experimental Polities’, paper presented at the United Kingdom Political Studies Association Conference, Manchester.Google Scholar
Rüdig, W., 1985b, ‘The Greens in Europe: Ecological Parties and the European Elections of 1984’, Parliamentary Affairs, XXXVIII, 56–72.Google Scholar
Rüdig, W., 1986, ‘A Comparison of Anti-Nuclear Movements in the United States, Britain, France and West Germany’, in Williams, R. and Mills, S., eds, Public Acceptance of New Technology (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Rüdig, W. and Lowe, P. D., 1984, ‘The Unfulfilled Prophecy: Touraine and the Anti-Nuclear Movement’, Modern and Contemporary France, no. 20 (12), 19–23.Google Scholar
Rüdig, W. and Lowe, P. D., 1986, ‘The Withered “Greening” of British Politics: A Study of the Ecology Party’, Political Studies (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P., 1975. ‘Social Movements and Regulatory Agencies: Toward a More Adequate – and less pessimistic – Theory of “Clientele Capture”’, Policy Sciences, VI, 301–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P., 1977, ‘Regulatory Policy-Making: Toward a Framework of Analysis’, Natural Resources Journal, XVII, 415–60.Google Scholar
Sanderson, J. B., 1974, ‘The National Smoke Abatement Society and the Clean Air Act (1956)’, pp. 27–44 of R. Kimber and J. J. Richardson, eds, op. cit.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M. G., 1984, ‘Demokratie, Wohlfahrtsstaat und neue soziale Bewegungen’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, no. 11, 3–14.Google Scholar
Schoonmaker, D., 1983, ‘The “Greens” in West Germany: Between Movement and Party’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schrepfer, S. R., 1983, The Fight to Save the Redwoods: A History of Environmental Reform 1917–1978 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
Schroeren, M., 1977, Z. B. Kaiseraugst: Der gewaltfreie Widerstand gegen das Atomkraftwerk (Zürich: Schweizerischer Friedensrat).Google Scholar
Schumaker, P. D., 1975, ‘Policy Responsiveness to Protest Group Demands’, Journal of Politics, XXXVII, 488–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheail, J., 1976, Nature in Trust (Glasgow: Blackie).Google Scholar
Sheail, J., 1981, Rural Conservation in Inter-war Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Siciński, A. and Wemegah, M., eds, 1983, Alternative Ways of Life in Contemporary Europe (Tokyo: United Nations University).Google Scholar
Simonis, U. E., 1984, Preventive Environmental Policy – Concept and Data Requirements (Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society, Science Centre Berlin).Google Scholar
Smith, P. J., ed., 1975, The Politics of Physical Resources (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Smith, V. K., 1985, ‘A Theoretical Analysis of the Green Lobby’, American Political Science Review, LXXIX, 132–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solesbury, W., 1976, ‘The Environmental Agenda’, Public Administration, LIV, 379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternstein, W., 1978, Überall ist Wyhl: Bürgerinitiativen gegen Atomanlagen (Frankfurt: Haag & Herchen).Google Scholar
Stockton, B. and Janke, P., 1978, Nuclear Power: Protest and Violence (London: Institute for the Study of Conflict).Google Scholar
Stouthuysen, P., 1983, ‘De politieke identiteit van de Vlaamse Groene Partij AGALEV, Res Publica, XXV, 349–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surrey, J. and Huggett, C., 1976, ‘Opposition to Nuclear Power: A Review of the International Experience’, Energy Policy, IV, 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, W., 1977, ‘The Opposition to Nuclear Power in Europe’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, XXXIII (10), 40–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, A. R., 1972, Power along the Hudson: The Storm King Case and the Birth of Environmentalism (New York: Dutton).Google Scholar
Taylor, R. and Pritchard, C., 1980, The Protest Makers: The British Nuclear Disarmament Movement of 1958–1965, Twenty Years on (Oxford: Pergamon Press).Google Scholar
Tellegen, E., 1981, ‘The Environmental Movement in the Netherlands’, Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning, III, 1–32.Google Scholar
Tellegen, E., 1983, Milieubeweging (Utrecht: Aula/Het Spectrum).Google Scholar
Thom, E., 1979, ‘The Emergence, Development and Effectiveness of the Nuclear Protest Movement’, pp. 21–82 of Küppers, G. and Nowotny, H., eds, The Impact of the Nuclear Controversy on Decision-making Structures (Bielefeld: Forschungsschwerpunkt Wissenschaftsforschung, Universität Bielefeld).Google Scholar
Thomas, K., 1983, Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800 (London: Allen Lane).Google Scholar
Tillock, H. and Morrison, D. E., 1979, ‘Group Size and Contributions to Collective Action: An Examination of Olson's Theory Using Data from Zero Population Growth, Inc.’, in Kriesberg, L., ed., Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (New York: JAI Press).Google Scholar
Touraine, A., Hegedus, Z., Dubet, F., and Wieviorka, M., 1980, La prophétie antinucléaire (Paris, Seuil). (English translation: Anti-nuclear Protest: The Opposition to Nuclear Energy in France (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).)Google Scholar
Troitzsch, K. G., 1980, ‘Die Herausforderung der “etablierten” Parteien durch die “Grünen”’, pp. 260–94 of Kaack, H. and Roth, R., eds, Handbuch des deutschen Parteiensystems, Vol. 1 (Opladen: Leske Verlag + Budrich GmbH).Google Scholar
Useem, B., 1980, ‘Solidarity Model, Breakdown Model and the Boston Anti-Busing Movement’, American Sociological Review, XLV, 357–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadrot, C. M., 1978, L'écologie, histoire d'une subversion (Paris: Syros).Google Scholar
Vadrot, C. M., 1980, ‘Historique des mouvements écologistes’, paper presented to the symposium Ecologisme et Politique, Association française de science politique, Paris.Google Scholar
Van Deth, J. 1983, ‘The Persistence of Materialist and Post-materialist Value Orientations’, European Journal of Political Research, XI, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Liere, K. D., Ladd, A. E. and Hood, T. C., 1979, ‘Anti-Nuclear Demonstrators: A Study of Participants in the May 6 Anti-Nuclear Demonstration’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Sociological Association, Memphis, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Van Liere, K. D. and Dunlap, R. E., 1980, ‘The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence’, Public Opinion Quarterly, XLIV, 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedung, E., 1985, ‘The Environmentalist Party and the Swedish Five-Party Syndrome’ in Lawson, K. and Merkl, P., eds, When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Von Moltke, K. and Visser, N., 1982, Die Rolle der Umweltschutzverbände im politischen Entscheidungsprozeβ der Niederlande (Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag).Google Scholar
Walker, P., ed., 1979, Between Capital and Labour (London: Harvester Press).Google Scholar
Ward, H., 1983, ‘The Anti-Nuclear Lobby: An Unequal Struggle?’, pp. 182–211 of D. Marsh, ed., op. cit.Google Scholar
Watts, N., 1979, ‘Gesellschaftspolitische Bedingungen der Umweltbewegung im internationalen Vergleich’, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, X, 170–7.Google Scholar
Watts, N. and Wandesforde-Smith, G., 1981, ‘Post-Material Values and Environmental Policy Change’, pp. 29–42 of D. E. Mann, ed., op. cit.Google Scholar
Webb, K. et al. , 1983, ‘Etiology and Outcomes of Protest: New European Perspectives’, American Behavioral Scientist, XXVI, 311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenner, L. M., 1982, The Environmental Decade in Court (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Wenner, L. M., 1983, ‘Interest Group Litigation and Environmental Policy’, Policy Studies Journal, XI, 671–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wey, K.-G., 1982, Umweltpolitik in Deutschland: Kurze Geschichte des Umweltschutzes in Deutschland seit 1900 (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, M. J., 1981, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850–1980 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q., 1973, Political Organizations (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Wynne, B., 1982, Rationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain (Chalfont St. Giles, Bucks.: The British Society for the History of Science).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, E., 1983, Political Violence, Crises, and Revolutions: Theories and Research (Boston/Cambridge, Mass.: G. K. Hall/Schenkman).Google Scholar