Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:32:01.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy, Office and Votes: The Electoral Value of Ministerial Office

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Shane Martin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parties are not unitary actors, and legislators within the same party may have divergent interests, which complicates the understanding of parties’ motivations and behaviour. This article argues that holding a ministerial portfolio confers an electoral advantage, and so, in contrast to their co-partisans, politicians who are ministers simultaneously maximize policy, office and votes. New data on Irish elections over a thirty-year period show that ministers are insulated from the electoral cost of governing compared with their co-partisans. Differentiating between ministers and their co-partisans helps to resolve the puzzle of political parties’ choosing to enter government despite the evident electoral costs they will encounter. Moreover, previously overlooked electoral benefits of ministerial office help explain their desirability, and thus their ability to incentivize legislative behaviour in parliamentary regimes.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 281 - 296
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester (Email: [email protected]). For comment on earlier versions, the author wishes to thank Robert Elgie, Bonnie Field, Carol Mershon, Eoin O’Malley, Ulrich Sieberer, Daniel M. Smith, Kaare Strøm, Liam Weeks, Reto Wüest and Antoine Yoshinaka, as well as three anonymous reviewers and participants at DCU’s Politics Research Seminar, the 2013 Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association and the 2013 ECPR General Conference. The author acknowledges the financial support of the Research Council of Norway (FRISAM Project No 222442) and invaluable research assistance from Gemma McNulty and Akisato Suzuki. Data replication sets are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123414000258.

References

REFERENCES

Alston, Lee J., and Mueller, Bernardo. 2006. Pork for Policy: Executive and Legislative Exchange in Brazil. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22 (1):87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, Rudy B. 2014. Roles in Legislatures. Pp. 267–285, in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, edited by Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld and Kaare Strøm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
André, Audrey, Depauw, Sam, and Deschouwer, Kris. 2012. Legislators’ Local Roots: Disentangling the Effect of District Magnitude. Party Politics, doi: 10.1177/1354068812458617, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Dumont, Patrick. 2011. Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 50 (4):441–478.Google Scholar
Berlinski, Samuel, Dewan, Torun, and Dowding, Keith. 2007. The Length of Ministerial Tenure in the United Kingdom, 1945–97. British Journal of Political Science 37 (2):245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Torbjörn, and Strøm, Kaare, eds. 2011. The Madisonian Turn: Political Parties and Parliamentary Democracy in Nordic Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bertelli, Anthony M., and Grose, Christian R.. 2009. Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy. Journal of Politics 71 (3):926–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomgren, Magnus, and Rozenberg, Olivier. 2012. Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David, and Katz, Richard, eds. 1999. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, and Laver, Michael. 1986. Office Seeking and Policy Pursuit in Coalition Theory. Legislative Studies Quarterly 11:485–506.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51 (1):92–107.Google Scholar
Carey, John M.. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4):417–439.Google Scholar
Carroll, Royce, Cox, Gary W., and Pachón, Mónica. 2006. How Parties Create Electoral Democracy, Chapter 2. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2):153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce, and Kim, Henry A.. 2010. Party Government and the ‘Cohesive Power of Public Plunder’. American Journal of Political Science 54:34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz, and Johansson, Eva. 2002. On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments. American Political Science Review 96 (1):27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debus, Marc. 2008. Office and Policy Payoffs in Coalition Governments. Party Politics 14 (5):515–538.Google Scholar
Denemark, David. 2000. Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Constituency-Level Grants. Journal of Politics 62 (3):896–915.Google Scholar
Depauw, Sam, and Martin, Shane. 2009. Legislative Party Discipline and Cohesion in Comparative Perspective. Pp. 103–120 in Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Governments in Parliamentary Democracies, edited by Daniela Giannetti and Kenneth Benoit. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Swaan, Abraham. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, Keane, Michael, and Merlo, Antonio. 2005. A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers. American Economic Review 95 (1):347–373.Google Scholar
Dowding, Keith, and Dumont, Patrick, eds. 2008. The Selection of Ministers in Europe: Hiring and Firing. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Field, Bonnie N. 2014. Minority Parliamentary Government and Multilevel Politics: Spain’s System of Mutual Back Scratching. Comparative Politics 46 (3):293–312.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, and Marsh, Michael, eds. 2011. How Ireland Voted 2011: The Full Story of Ireland’s Earthquake Election. Basingstoke, Hants.: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gherghina, Sergiu, and Chiru, Mihail. 2013. Determinants of Legislative Voting Loyalty under Different Electoral Systems: Evidence from Romania. International Political Science Review, doi: 0192512113501242, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam A., and Picci, Lucio. 2008. Pork-Barrel Politics in Postwar Italy, 1953–94. American Journal of Political Science 52 (2):268–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona, and Siegel, David. 2012. Modeling the Institutional Foundations of Parliamentary Government Formation. Journal of Politics 74:427–445.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Messing, Solomon, and Westwood, Sean. 2012. How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation. American Political Science Review 106 (4):703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Martin Ejnar, Klemmensen, Robert, Hobolt, Sara B., and Bäck, Hanna. 2013. Portfolio Saliency and Ministerial Turnover: Dynamics in Scandinavian Postwar Cabinets. Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (3):227–248.Google Scholar
John, Peter, Ward, Hugh, and Dowding, Keith. 2004. The Bidding Game: Competitive Funding Regimes and the Political Targeting of Urban Programme Schemes. British Journal of Political Science 34 (3):405–428.Google Scholar
Kam, Christopher, Bianco, William T., Sened, Itai, and Smyth, Regina. 2010. Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament. American Political Science Review 104 (2):289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kerby, Matthew. 2009. Worth the Wait: Determinants of Ministerial Appointment in Canada, 1935–2008. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (3):593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 8th edn. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Larcinese, Valentino, Rizzo, Leonzio, and Testa, Cecilia. 2006. Allocating the US Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President. Journal of Politics 68 (2):447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael. 1998. Models of Government Formation. Annual Review of Political Science 1:1–25.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCarthaigh, Muiris. 2005. Accountability in Irish Parliamentary Politics. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan M. 2000. Presidential Pork: Executive Veto Power and Distributive Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (1):117–129.Google Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona. 2004. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maestas, Cherie. 2003. The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring Among State Legislators. Journal of Politics 65 (2):439–456.Google Scholar
Martin, Shane. 2010. Electoral Rewards for Personal Vote Cultivation under PR-STV. West European Politics 33 (2):369–380.Google Scholar
Martin, Shane. 2011. Electoral Institutions, the Personal Vote and Legislative Organization. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (3):339–361.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. The Electoral Connection. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Strøm, Kaare, eds. 1999. Policy, Office or Votes: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Strøm, Kaare, eds. 2000. Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Portillo, Juan. 2011. Legislators’ Behaviour under Closed-List PR and Open-List PR: Evidence from Honduras. Unpublished, Dublin City University.Google Scholar
Narud, Hanne Marthe, and Valen, Henry. 2008. Coalition Membership and Electoral Performance. Pp. 369–402 in Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, edited by Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjorn Bergman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nyblade, Benjamin. 2013. Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies. Pp. 13–31 in Party Governance and Party Democracy, edited by Hanne Marthe Narud and Wolfgang C. Müller. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, Eoin. 2006. Ministerial Selection in Ireland: Limited Choice in a Political Village. Irish Political Studies 21 (3):319–336.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, and Mackie, Thomas T.. 1983. Incumbency in Government: Asset or Liability? Pp. 115–137 in Western European Party Systems: Continuity & Change, edited by Hans Daalder and Peter Mair. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas, and Strøm, Kaare W.. 2014. Political Parties and Legislators. Pp. 371–398 in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, edited by Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Søberg, Valdini, Melody Ellis, and Suominen, Kati. 2005. Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science 49 (2):437–449.Google Scholar
Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (2):150–178.Google Scholar
Sieberer, Ulrich. 2010. Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems: Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag. Electoral Studies 29 (3):484–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel M., and Martin, Shane. 2014. Political Dynasties and the Selection of Ministers: The Legacy Advantage in Japan and Ireland. Unpublished, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1984. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies 17 (2):199–227.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1990a. Minority Governments and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1990b. A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 34 (2):565–598.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1997. Rules, Reasons, and Routines: Legislative Roles in Parliamentary Democracies. Journal of Legislative Studies 3:155–174.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 2011. Roles as Strategies: Towards a Logic of Legislative Behaviour. Pp. 85–100 in Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures, edited by Magnus Blomgren and Olivier Rozenberg. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C., and Bergman, Torbjörn, eds. 2006. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suiter, Jane, and O’Malley, Eoin. 2013. Yes, Minister: The Impact of Decision-Making Rules on Geographically Targeted Particularistic Spending. Parliamentary Affairs, doi: 10.1093/pa/gst004, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Weeks, Liam. 2011. Rage Against the Machine: Who is the Independent Voter? Irish Political Studies 26 (1):19–43.Google Scholar
Wehner, Joachim. 2010. Legislatures and the Budget Process: The Myth of Fiscal Control. Basingstoke, Hants.: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wood, David M., and Young, Garry. 1997. Comparing Constituency Activity by Junior Legislators in Great Britain and Ireland. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (2):217–232.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Martin Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Martin Supplementary Material(File)
File 152.5 KB