Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2009
Legitimacy may be defined as that political condition in which power-holders are able to justify their holding of power in terms other than those of the mere fact of power-holding. According to one view such justifications are increasingly tenuous due to the conditions under which the modern state has arisen and the means it employs in order to persist. Theories of legitimacy typically view power from two aspects – from that of its origins and from that of its ends. More concretely, this invariably involves, on the one hand, some discussion of the degree to which a regime of a government.can be said to rest on democratic consent and, on the other, of the extent to which the regime or government guides its actions by some notion of the common good or public interest. Neither of these focuses, in Schaar's view, are likely to provide adequate justifications for power under modern conditions: ‘criticism and hard events have done their work: both concepts have been reduced to rubble’.
1 Schaar, J., ‘Legitimacy in the Modern State’ in Green, P. and Levinson, S., eds., Power and Community (New York: Vintage Books, 1970), p. 288.Google Scholar
2 Lowenthal, R., ‘On “Established” Communist Party Regimes’, Studies in Comparative Communism, VII (1974), 335–58, pp. 351–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Szporluk, R., ‘Poland’ in Grew, R., ed., Crises of Political Development in Europe and the United States (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1978), p. 415.Google Scholar
4 Karol, K. S., ‘How to Change Things for Good’ in ‘Il Manifesto’ Conference, Power and Opposition in Post-Revolutionary Societies (London: Ink Links, 1979), p. 147.Google Scholar
5 Croan, M., ‘The Leading Role of the Party’ in Janos, A., ed., Authoritarian Politics in Communist Europe (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, 1976), p. 170.Google Scholar
6 Brzezinski, Z., The Soviet Bloc (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), p. 96.Google Scholar
7 Szczypiorski, A., ‘The Limits of Political Realism’, Survey, XXIV (1979). 21–32. p. 26.Google Scholar
8 Korbonski, A., ‘Poland’, in Rakowska-Harmstone, T. and Gyorgy, A., eds., Communism in Eastern Europe (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979). p. 41.Google Scholar
9 Tarniewski, M., Pareja wolności (Paris: Kultura, 1979), p. 138.Google Scholar
10 Bethell, N., Gomuika (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972), p. 202.Google Scholar
11 ABC, ‘1956–1970–1980’, Kultura, 11 1980, p. 19.Google Scholar
12 Sakwa, G., ‘The Polish October’, Polish Review, XXIII (1978), 62–78, p. 76.Google Scholar
13 Pienkos, D., ‘Party Elites and Society’, Polish Review, XX (1975), 27–42, p. 37.Google Scholar
14 Beck, C., ‘Leadership Attributes in Eastern Europe’ in Beck, C. et al. , eds., Comparative Communist Political Leadership (New York: David McKay, 1973), p. 98.Google Scholar
15 Staniszkis, J., ‘On Some Contradictions of Socialist Society’, Soviet Studies, XXXI (1979), 167–87, p. 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Statisticheski Ezhegodnik (1974), p. 53.Google Scholar
17 Bromke, A., ‘La nouvelle élite politique en Pologne’, Revue de l'est' (07 1974), 7–18, p. 17.Google Scholar
18 Tellenback, S., ‘The Logic of Development in Socialist Poland’, Social Forces, LVII (1978), 436–56, p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Dean, R., ‘Gierek's Three Years’, Survey, XX (1974), 59–75, p. 67.Google Scholar
20 Polityka, 18 10 1980.Google Scholar
21 Polityka, 16 05 1981.Google Scholar
22 Polityka, 27 10 1976.Google Scholar
23 Blazynski, G., Flashpoint Poland (New York: Pergamon Books, 1979), p. 321.Google Scholar
24 Further discussion of the reforms can be found in Lewis, P. G., ‘Political Consequences of the Changes in Party/State Structure under Gierek’, in Woodall, J., ed., Policy and Politics in Contemporary Poland (London: Frances Pinter, forthcoming 1982).Google Scholar
25 Macierewicz, A., ‘Walka o prawa obywatelskie’, Głos (Paris: Kultura, 1980), p. 131.Google Scholar
26 Kuron, J., Zasady ideowe (Paris: Kultura, 1978), p. 29.Google Scholar
27 Guardian, 13 08 1980.Google Scholar
28 Statement by the Prime Minister in Nowe Drogi (04 1980), p. 27.Google Scholar
29 Rocznik Statystyczny (1979), p. 77.Google Scholar
30 Mały Rocznik Statystyczny (1981), p. 56.Google Scholar
31 Wieś Współczesna (08 1980), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
32 Nowe Drogi (06 1980), p. 142.Google Scholar
33 Raport o stanie narodu i PRL (Paris: Kultura, 1980), p. 52.Google Scholar
34 Polityka, 4 10 1980.Google Scholar
35 With some prescience ‘a certain degree of intoxication’ had been detected eight years earlier by Bromke, A., ‘Poland under Gierek: a New Political Style’, Problems of Communism, XXI (1972), 1–19, p. 19.Google Scholar
36 Nowe Drogi (10/11 1980), p. 46.Google Scholar
37 Polityka, 18 10 1980.Google Scholar
38 Polityka, 18 10 1980.Google Scholar
39 Connor, W., ‘Dissent in Eastern Europe’, Problems of Communism, XXIX (1980), 1–17, p. 14.Google Scholar
40 Tarniewski, M., Ewolucja czy rewolucja (Paris: Kultura, 1975), pp. 274–5.Google Scholar
41 Polityka, 13 09 1980.Google Scholar The survey findings are also discussed in European Political Data Newsletter, No. 37.
42 Kultura (Warsaw), 22 03 1981.Google Scholar
43 Le Matin, 22 06 1981.Google Scholar
44 Nowe Drogi (12 1980), p. 13.Google Scholar
45 Polityka, 2 05 1981.Google Scholar
46 Polityka, 17 01 1981.Google Scholar
47 Polityka, 7 03 1981.Google Scholar
48 Życie Partii (11 1980), p. 21.Google Scholar
49 Polityka, 14 03 1981.Google Scholar
50 Nowe Drogi (01/02 1981), p. 92.Google Scholar
51 Polityka, 21 03 1981.Google Scholar
52 Polityka, 28 03 1981.Google Scholar
53 Polityka, 4 04 1981.Google Scholar