Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:41:00.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commodity Shocks and Incumbency Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2021

Lucas M. Novaes  and
Luis Schiumerini Open the ORCID record for Luis Schiumerini [Opens in a new window]
Lucas M. Novaes*
Affiliation:
Insper Institute of Education and Research
Luis Schiumerini*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do incumbents enjoy an electoral advantage in some political settings but suffer from a disadvantage in others? We propose a novel explanation linking variation in incumbency effects with exogenous commodity shocks. While voters attempt to sanction incumbents for economic performance, changes in commodity prices affect their evaluations and condition the electoral fortunes of incumbents vis-à-vis challengers. We test our argument in Brazilian municipalities, combining a plausibly exogenous measure of variation in commodity prices with a close election regression discontinuity design. Our results show that increases in the price of agricultural commodities greatly enhance the prospects of incumbents, while negative shocks exacerbate their incumbency disadvantage, especially in rural municipalities. Further investigation suggests that commodity shocks do not operate via voter learning about candidate quality, changes in the pool of candidates, shifts in voter preferences, or strategic elite investments. Instead, we find suggestive evidence that commodity shocks affect voters' evaluations through their effect on local economic growth.

Keywords

incumbency effectscommodity shocksaccountability
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 1689 - 1708
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, CH and Bartels, LM (2017) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Afonso, JR and Araújo, E.A., (2006) Local government organization and finance: Brazil. In Shah, A (ed.), Local Governance in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 381–416.Google Scholar
Arretche, M (2012) Democracia, Federalismo E Centralização no Brasil [Democracy, Federalism and Centralization in Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz e FGV Editoras.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, S and Bueno de Mesquita, E (2014) Is voter competence good for voters? Information, rationality, and democratic performance. American Political Science Review 108(3), 565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, S, Bueno de Mesquita, E and Friedenberg, A (2018) Learning about voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science 62(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, RR and Lupu, N (2016) Oil Windfalls and the Political Resource Curse: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Brazil. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of European Political Science Association, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Boas, TC, Hidalgo, FD and Melo, MA (2019) Norms versus action: why voters fail to sanction malfeasance in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science 63(2), 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brollo, F et al. (2013) The political resource curse. American Economic Review 103(5), 1759–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, NS (2018) Bypassing the enemy: distributive politics, credit claiming, and nonstate organizations in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 51(3), 304–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, NS and Dunning, T (2017) Race, resources, and representation: evidence from Brazilian politicians. World Politics 69(2), 327–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, NS and Tuñón, G (2015) Graphical presentation of regression discontinuity results. The Political Methodologist 22(2), 4–8.Google Scholar
Calonico, S, Cattaneo, MD and Titiunik, R (2014) Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6), 2295–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E and Murillo, MV (2004) Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science 48(4), 742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, D and Zucco, C (2016) Presidential success and the world economy. The Journal of Politics 78(2), 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, D and Zucco, C (2020) The Volatility Curse: Exogenous Shocks and Representation in Resource-Rich Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, RE, Singer, MM and Zechmeister, E (2015) The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Magalhães, L (2015) Incumbency effects in a comparative perspective: evidence from Brazilian mayoral elections. Political Analysis 23(1), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, RM and Stevenson, R (2008) The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, T (2012) Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, T et al. (2019) Information, Accountability, and Cumulative Learning: Lessons from Metaketa I. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebeid, M and Rodden, J (2006) Economic geography and economic voting: evidence from the US states. British Journal of Political Science 36(3), 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, A (2017) Quality-based explanations of incumbency effects. The Journal of Politics 79(4), 1315–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feierherd, G (2020) How mayors hurt their presidential ticket: party brands and incumbency spillovers in Brazil. The Journal of Politics 82(1), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz, C and Finan, F (2011) Electoral accountability and corruption: evidence from the audits of local governments. American Economic Review 101(4), 1274–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouirnaies, A and Hall, AB (2014) The financial incumbency advantage: causes and consequences. The Journal of Politics 76(3), 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A and Hall, AB (2018) Do shark attacks influence presidential elections? Reassessing a prominent finding on voter competence. The Journal of Politics 80(4), 1423–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, JT and Reeves, A (2011) Make it rain? Retrospection and the attentive electorate in the context of natural disasters. American Journal of Political Science 55(2), 340–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, K (2007) Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A and Lenz, G (2014) Substituting the end for the whole: why voters respond primarily to the election-year economy. American Journal of Political Science 58(1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A and Malhotra, N (2009) Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review 103(3), 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A, Malhotra, N and Mo, C (2010) Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(29), 12804–12809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, G, Hill, S and Lenz, G (2012) Sources of bias in retrospective decision making: experimental evidence on voters’ limitations in controlling incumbents. American Political Science Review 106(4), 720–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, PG (2020) Linkage switches in local elections: evidence from the Workers’ Party in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 53(1), 109–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, MA and Wlezien, C (2011) Performance pressure: patterns of partisanship and the economic vote. European Journal of Political Research 50(3), 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klašnja, M (2015) Corruption and incumbency disadvantage: theory and evidence. Journal of Politics 928–942(4), 3–24.Google Scholar
Klašnja, M (2016) Increasing rents and incumbency disadvantage. Journal of Theoretical Politics 28(2), 225–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klašnja, M and Titiunik, R (2017) The incumbency curse: weak parties, term limits, and unfulfilled accountability. American Political Science Review 111(1), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, MV et al. (2019) When do citizens respond politically to the local economy? Evidence from registry data on local housing markets. American Political Science Review 113(2), 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D (2008) Randomized experiments from non-random selection in US House elections. Journal of Econometrics 142(2), 675–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, N (2013) Party brands and partisanship: theory with evidence from a survey experiment in Argentina. American Journal of Political Science 57(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, M, Pereira, C and Figueiredo, CM (2009) Political and institutional checks on corruption: explaining the performance of Brazilian audit institutions. Comparative Political Studies 42(9), 1217–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, LM (2018) Disloyal brokers and weak parties. American Journal of Political Science 62(1), 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, L and Schiumerini, L (2021) Replication Data for Commodity Shocks and Incumbency Effects. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EV8CBE, Harvard Dataverse, V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavão, N (2018) Corruption as the only option: the limits to electoral accountability. The Journal of Politics 80(3), 996–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, C and Melo, MA (2015) Reelecting corrupt incumbents in exchange for public goods: rouba mas faz in Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 50(4), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, D and Zucco, C (2014) The power of partisanship in Brazil: evidence from survey experiments. American Journal of Political Science 58(1), 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, D and Zucco, C (2016) Party-building in Brazil. In Levitsky, S et al. (eds), Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 305–330.Google Scholar
Schiumerini, L (2019) Imperfect Evaluations and Incumbency Effects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Schiumerini, L and Steinberg, DA (2020) The black market blues: the political costs of illicit currency markets. The Journal of Politics 82(4), 1217–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S (2005) Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99(3), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tertytchnaya, K et al. (2018) When the money stops: fluctuations in financial remittances and incumbent approval in Central Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. American Political Science Review 112(4), 758–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2019) The State of Commodity Dependence 2019. New York, NY, and Geneva: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Uppal, Y (2009) The disadvantaged incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures. Public Choice 138(1), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, R and Winters, M (2017) Can citizens discern? Information credibility, political sophistication, and the punishment of corruption in Brazil. Journal of Politics 79(1), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, M and Weitz-Shapiro, R (2013) Lacking information or condoning corruption: when Do voters support corrupt politicians? Comparative Politics 45(4), 418–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Novaes and Schiumerini Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EV8CBE
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Novaes and Schiumerini supplementary material

Novaes and Schiumerini supplementary material

Download Novaes and Schiumerini supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 743.7 KB