Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:30:51.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anticipating War? War Preparations and the Steps-to-War Thesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2016

Susan G. Sample
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study addresses what it means, theoretically and diplomatically, to argue that states anticipate war. The ‘steps-to-war’ thesis contends that territorial disputes are high salience issues, but war is relatively unlikely unless state policies, such as arms buildups, directly increase the probability of war. This framework contrasts with the argument that these policies simply reflect underlying conflict, seen as the primary cause of both policies and war. The historical analysis here indicates that states do ‘anticipate’ war, but, at least in the case of wars related to ongoing territorial conflicts, it is theoretically trivial: states anticipate war, engaging in final preparations after their relations have deteriorated over time, and the process occurs in ways predicted by the steps-to-war theory.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 489 - 511
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

School of International Studies, Department of Political Science, University of the Pacific (email: [email protected]).

References

REFERENCES

Brandt, Anthony. 2012. The Balkanized War. Military History 29:28–37.Google Scholar
Colaresi, Michael, Rasler, Karen, and Thompson, William. 2008. Strategic Rivals in World Politics: Position, Space, and Conflict Escalation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crockett, Jameson W. 2009. The Polish Blitz, More than a Mere Footnote to History: Poland and Preventive War with Germany, 1933. Diplomacy & Statecraft 20:561–579.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F. 1998. The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F., and Goertz, Gary. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F., and Crescenzi, Mark. 1998. Reconfiguring the Arms Race–War Debate. Journal of Peace Research 35:111–118.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Signaling versus the Balance of Power and Interests: An Empirical Test of a Crisis Bargaining Model. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38:236–269.Google Scholar
Ghosn, Faten, Palmer, Glenn, and Bremer, Stuart. 2004. The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21:133–154.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. 2000. Alliances: Why Some Cause War and Why Others Cause Peace. Pp. 145–164 in What Do We Know about War?, edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M., and Vasquez, John A.. 1998. Uncovering the Dangerous Alliances, 1495–1980. International Studies Quarterly 42 (4):785–807.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M., Rider, Toby J., and Hutchison, Marc L.. 2005. Taking Arms against a Sea of Troubles: Conventional Arms Races during Periods of Rivalry. Journal of Peace Research 42:131–147.Google Scholar
Hensel, Paul. 2000. Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict. Pp. 57–84 in What Do We Know about War?, edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hensel, Paul R., Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Sowers II, Thomas E., and Thyne, Clayton L.. 2008. Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution 1:117–143.Google Scholar
Hewel, Walther. 1938. Conversation of the German Foreign Minister with the Polish Ambassador at Berchtesgaden. Pp. 199–203 in Documents on the Events Preceding the Outbreak of the War, published by the German Foreign Office (Berlin 1939). English Translation: New York (1940).Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K. 2000. Territory: Why are Territorial Disputes between States a Central Cause of International Conflict? Pp. 85–110 in What Do We Know about War?, edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K., and Allee, Todd. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kallis, Aristotle. 2010. Neither Fascist nor Authoritarian: The 4th of August Regime in Greece (1936–1941) and the Dynamics of Fascistization in 1930s Europe. East Central Europe 37:303–330.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krosby, H. Peter. 1968. Finland, Germany, and the Soviet Union, 1940–1941. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. 2000. Arms Races and Arms Control: Modeling the Hawk Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 44:222–238.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Ritter, Jeffrey M., Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Long, Andrew G.. 2002. Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provision, 1815–1944. International Interactions 28:237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2000. Reflections on the Scientific Study of War. Pp. 319–327 in What Do We Know about War?, edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2008. Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science 25:1–18.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2012. The ‘Paths-to-War’ Concept. Pp. 281–290 in What Do We Know about War? II, edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
McSherry, James E. 1970. Stalin, Hitler, and Europe, Vol 2: The Imbalance of Power 1939–1941. Cleveland, Ohio: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Molotov, Vyacheslav. 1939. Radio Address (29 November). Pp. 602–604 in Documentary Background of World War II, 1939–1941, edited by James W. Gantenbein. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, Cathal J. 2002. Greenwood Encyclopedia of International Relations. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen, and Thompson, William R.. 2012. War Making and State Making: How and Where Does It Fit into the Bigger Picture. Pp. 237–255 in What Do We Know about War? II, edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin, and Levy, Jack S.. 2008. Wishful Thinking or Buying Time? The Logic of British Appeasement in the 1930s. International Security 33:148–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosting, Helmer. 1933. Letter from the League Commissioner in Danzig to the Secretary General of the League of Nations. Pp. 38–40 in Documents on the Events Preceding the Outbreak of the War, published by the German Foreign Office (Berlin 1939). English translation: New York (1940).Google Scholar
Sample, Susan G. 1997. Arms Races and Dispute Escalation: Resolving the Debate. Journal of Peace Research 34:7–22.Google Scholar
Sample, Susan G. 2002. The Outcomes of Military Buildups: Minor States vs. Major Powers. Journal of Peace Research 39:669–691.Google Scholar
Sample, Susan G. 2012. Arms Races: Cause or Symptom? Pp. 111–138 in What Do We Know about War? II, edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Senese, Paul D., and Vasquez, John A.. 2004. Alliances, Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War: Testing for Interactions. Pp. 189–221 in The Scourge of War: New Extensions on an Old Problem, edited by Paul F. Diehl. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Senese, Paul D., and Vasquez, John A.. 2008. The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David. 1987. Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985. International Interactions 14:115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav. 2009. Review of the Steps to War: An Empirical Study, by Paul Senese and John Vasquez, 2008. Political Science Quarterly 124:386–388.Google Scholar
Tase, Peter. 2012. Italy and Albania: The Political and Economic Alliance and the Italian Invasion of 1939. Academicus 6:62–70.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 2004. The Probability of War, 1816–1992. International Studies Quarterly 48:1–28.Google Scholar
Von Moltke, Hans-Adolf. 1938. Memorandum of the German Ambassador in Warsaw (19 November). Pp. 203–4 in Documents on the Events Preceding the Outbreak of the War, published by the German Foreign Office (Berlin 1939). English translation: New York (1940).Google Scholar
Von Moltke, Hans-Adolf. 1939. Telegram from the German Ambassador in Warsaw to the Foreign Office. Pp. 212 in Documents on the Events Preceding the Outbreak of the War, published by the German Foreign Office (Berlin 1939). English translation: New York (1940).Google Scholar