Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:36:51.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Abandoning Manipulation: A Response to Ware's Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Extract

I fear that Alan Ware's Reply to my Comment only serves to reinforce my view that his argument is mistaken. Indeed, without apparently realizing it he concedes much of what I want to claim.

Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mill, J. S., On Liberty, Everyman edn (London: Dent, 1910), pp. 151–2. My emphasis.Google Scholar

2 For a recent reading of Mill that makes this point see Ten, C. L., Mill on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 109.Google Scholar

3 A slightly more subtle form of the same distinction is if my description of the action differs from the actor's. I tell him that what he is doing is drinking sulphuric acid; he denies this and says that what he's drinking contains no sulphuric acid. We agree that he wants to drink an alcoholic punch but not an acidic one. If I intervene to stop him it is again – as in the text – solely on the grounds of my claimed superior knowledge.