Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T21:25:18.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of energy intake by 24-hour multiple pass recall: comparison with total energy expenditure in children aged 5–7 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

Colette Montgomery ,
John J. Reilly ,
Diane M. Jackson ,
Louise A. Kelly ,
Christine Slater ,
James Y. Paton  and
Stan Grant
Colette Montgomery
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow Division of Developmental Medicine, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK
John J. Reilly*
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow Division of Developmental Medicine, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK
Diane M. Jackson
Affiliation:
Division of Energy Balance and Obesity, Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB21 9SB, UK
Louise A. Kelly
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow Division of Developmental Medicine, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK
Christine Slater
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow Division of Developmental Medicine, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK
James Y. Paton
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow Division of Developmental Medicine, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK
Stan Grant
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biological and Life Sciences, West Medical Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr John J. Reilly, fax +44 (0)141 201 9275, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Accurate measurement of energy intake (EI) is essential in studies of energy balance in all age groups. Reported values for EI can be validated against total energy expenditure (TEE) measured using doubly labelled water (DLW). Our previous work has indicated that the use of the standardized 24 h multiple pass recall (24 h MPR) method produces slight overestimates of EI in pre-school children which are inaccurate at individual level but acceptable at group level. To extend this work, the current study validated EI by 24 h MPR against TEE by DLW in sixty-three (thirty-two boys) school-aged children (median age 6 years). In both boys and girls, reported EI was higher than TEE, although this difference was only significant in the girls (median difference 420 kJ/d, P=0·05). On analysis of agreement between TEE and EI, the group bias was an overestimation of EI by 250 kJ/d with wide limits of agreement (−2880, 2380 kJ/d). EI was over-reported relative to TEE by 7 % and 0·9 % in girls and boys, respectively. The bias in the current study was lower than in our previous study of pre-school children, suggesting that estimates of EI become less inaccurate as children age. However, the current study suggests that the 24 h MPR is inaccurate at the individual level.

Keywords

Diet recordsObesityChild nutritionEnergy expenditureDoubly labelled water method
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 93 , Issue 5 , May 2005 , pp. 671 - 676
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2005

References

Bandini, LG, Must, A, Cyr, H, Anderson, SE, Spadano, JL & Dietz, WH (2003) Longitudinal changes in the accuracy of reported energy intake in girls 10–15 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 480–484.Google Scholar
Biró, G, Hulshof, KFAM, Ovesen, L & Cruz, JAA (2002) Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, S25–S32.Google Scholar
Black, AE (2000) The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 395–404.Google Scholar
Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 307–310IGoogle Scholar
Brustad, M, Skeie, G, Braaten, T, Slimani, N & Lund, E (2003) Comparison of telephone vs face-to-face interviews in the assessment of dietary intake by the 24 h recall EPIC SOFT program – the Norwegian calibration study. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 107–113.Google Scholar
Casey, PH, Goolsby, SLP, Lensing, SY, Perloff, BP & Bogle, ML (1999) The use of telephone interview methodology to obtain 24-hour dietary recalls. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 1406–1411.Google Scholar
Chambers, E, McGuire, B, Godwin, S, McDowell, M & Vecchio, F (2000) Quantifying portion sizes for selected snack foods and beverages in 24-hour dietary recalls. Nutr Res 20, 315–326.Google Scholar
Cole, TJ, Freeman, JV & Preece, MA (1995) Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child 73, 25–29.Google Scholar
Davies, PSW & Coward, WA (1994) Total energy expenditure and energy intake in the pre-school child: a comparison. Br J Nutr 72, 13–20.Google Scholar
Fisher, JO, Johnson, RK, Lindquist, C, Birch, LL & Goran, MI (2000) Influence of body composition on the accuracy of reported energy intake in children. Obes Res 8, 597–603.Google Scholar
Gregory, JL, Collins, DL, Davies, PSW, Hughes, JM & Clarke, PC (1995) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Children Aged 1.5 to 4.5 Years, Vol. 1, Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Guenther, PM, Cleveland, LE & & Ingwersen, LA (1998) Questionnaire Development and Data Collection Procedures. In Design and Operation: The Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey, 1994–96, pp. 42–63 [Tippett, PA, Cypel, YS, editors]. Nationwide Food Surveys Report no. 96-1. Riverdale, MA, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.Google Scholar
Hill, RJ & Davies, PSW (2001) The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique. Br J Nutr 85, 415–430.Google Scholar
Jackson, DM, Reilly, JJ, Kelly, LA, Montgomery, C, Grant, S & Paton, JY (2003) Objectively measured physical activity in a representative sample of 3- to 4-year-old children. Obes Res 11, 420–425.Google Scholar
Johnson, RK, Driscoll, P & Goran, MI (1996) Comparison of multiple-pass 24-hour recall estimates of energy intake with total energy expenditure determined by the doubly labeled water method in young children. J Am Diet Assoc 96, 1140–1144.Google Scholar
Johnson, RK, Soultanakis, RP, Goran, MI & Matthews, DE (1999) Accuracy of estimates of energy intake using the multiple-pass 24 h recall method in young children and adult women: a doubly-labelled water study. Proc Nutr Soc 58 47AGoogle Scholar
Jonnalagadda, SS, Mitchell, DC, Smiciklas-Wright, H, Meaker, KB, Van Heel, N, Karmally, W, Ershow, AG, Kris-Etherton, PM (2000) Accuracy of energy intake data estimated by a multiple-pass, 24-hour dietary recall technique. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 303–308.Google Scholar
Kaskoun, MC, Johnson, RK & Goran, MI (1994) Comparison of energy intake by semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire with total energy expenditure by the doubly labeled water method in young children. Am J Clin Nutr 60, 43–47.Google Scholar
Livingstone, MBE & Black, AE (2003) Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr 133 895S – 920SGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, MBE & Robson, PJ (2000) Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc Nutr Soc 59, 279–293.Google Scholar
Mennen, LI, Bertrais, S, Galan, P, Arnault, N, de Couray, GP & Hercberg, S (2002) The use of computerised 24 h dietary recalls in the French SU.VI.MAX Study: number of recalls required. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, 659–665.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1993) Food Portion Sizes, 2nd ed. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Montgomery, C, Reilly, JJ, Jackson, DM, Kelly, LA, Slater, C, Paton, JY & Grant, S (2004) Relation between physical activity and energy expenditure in a representative sample of young children. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 591–596.Google Scholar
Moshfegh, A, Borrud, L, Perloff, B & LaComb, R (1999) Improved method for the 24-hour dietary recall for use in national surveys. FASEB J 13 4 A603Google Scholar
Nelson, M, Atkinson, M & Meyer, J (1997) A Photographic Atlas of Food Portion Sizes, London: MAFF Publications.Google Scholar
Reilly, JJ, Jackson, DM, Montgomery, C, Kelly, LA, Slater, C, Grant, S & Paton, JY (2004) Total energy expenditure and physical activity in young Scottish children: mixed longitudinal study. Lancet 363, 211–212.Google Scholar
Reilly, JJ, Montgomery, C, Jackson, D, MacRitchie, J & Armstrong, J (2001) Energy intake by multiple pass 24-hour recall and total energy expenditure: a comparison in a representative sample of 3–4 year olds. Br J Nutr 86, 601–605.Google Scholar
Schoeller, DA, Ravussin, E, Schutz, Y, Acheson, KJ, Baertschi, P, Jéquier, E (1986) Energy expenditure by doubly labeled water: validation in humans and proposed calculation. Am J Physiol 250, R823–R830.Google Scholar
Slimani, N, Ferrari, P, Ocké, M (2000) Standardization of the 24-h diet recall calibration method used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 900–917.Google Scholar
Sobo, EJ, Rock, CL, Neuhouser, ML, Maciel, TL, Neumark-Sztainer, D (2000) Caretaker–child interaction during children's 24-hour dietary recalls: who contributes what to the recall record?. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 428–433.Google Scholar
Tran, KM, Johnson, RK, Soultanakis, RP & Matthews, DE (2000) In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 777–783.Google Scholar
US Department of AgricultureUS Department of Agriculture (1998) Food Instruction Booklet 1994–1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and Diet and Health Knowledge Survey CD-ROM. Riverdale, MA, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research ServiceGoogle Scholar