Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:26:09.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of ileal digestible amino acids by pigs: Lysine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

E. S. Batterham ,
L. M. Andersen ,
D. R. Baigent ,
S. A. Beech  and
R. Elliott
E. S. Batterham
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture & Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
L. M. Andersen
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture & Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
D. R. Baigent
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture & Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
S. A. Beech
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture & Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
R. Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two experiments were conducted to determine the utilization of ileal digestible lysine by pigs. In the first, the apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in cottonseed meal, meat-and-bone meal and soya-bean meal was determined in pigs fitted with‘T'-shaped cannulas. In the second experiment, three lysine-deficient diets were formulated to 0.36 g ileal digestible lysine/MJ digestible energy (DE), with lysine contributed from the three protein concentrates as the only source of lysine in sugar-based diets. An additional three diets were formulated with supplements of lysine to verify that lysine was limiting in the first three diets. The growth performance and retention of lysine by pigs given the six diets over the 20–45 kg growth phase were then determined. The apparent ileal digestibility of lysine in the three protein concentrates (proportion of total) was: cottonseed meal 0.74, meat-and-bone meal 0.78, soya-bean meal 0.89. Growth rates (g/d) of the pigs given the three diets formulated to 0.36 g ileal digestible lysine/MJ DE were significantly different (P < 0.001): cottonseed meal 377, meat-and-bone meal 492, soya-bean meal 541. The response of pigs to the addition of lysine confirmed that lysine was limiting in these diets. Crude protein (nitrogen× 6.25) deposited by the pigs was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for those given soya-bean meal (77 g/d), relative to meat-and-bone meal (66 g/d) and cottonseed meal (38 g/d). The proportion of ileal digestible lysine retained by pigs given the three protein concentrates was: cottonseed meal 0.36, meat-and-bone meal 0.60, soya-bean meal 0.75. The results indicate that values for the ileal digestibility of lysine in protein concentrates are unsuitable in dietary formulations as the assay does not reflect the proportion of lysine that can be utilized by the pig. It appears that, with heat-processed meals, a considerable proportion of the lysine is absorbed in a form(s) that is (are) inefficiently utilized.

Keywords

Ileal digestibilityLysine utilizationProtein concentratesPigs
Type
Amino Acid Availability
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , November 1990 , pp. 679 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1990

References

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S., Andersen, L. M., Baigent, R. D., Darnell, R. E. & Taverner, M. R. (1990 a). A comparison of the availability and ileal digestibility of lysine in cottonseed and soya-bean meals for grower/finisher pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 64, 663–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Andersen, L. M., Baigent, D. R., Darnell, R. E. & Taverner, M. R. (1990 a). A comparison of by growing pigs: effect of dietary lysine concentration on efficiency of lysine retention. British Journal of Nutrition 64, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterham, E. S. & Murison, R. D. (1981). Utilization of free lysine by growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, J. L., Campbell, R. G., Williams, I. H., James, K. J. & Davies, G. T. (1986). Simulation of energy and amino acid utilization in the pig. Research and Development in Agriculture 3, 121–145.Google Scholar
Burlacu, G., Baia, G., Ionila, D., Moisa, D., Tascenco, V., Visan, I. & Stoica, I. (1973). Efficiency of the utilization of the energy of food in piglets after weaning. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. & Rayner, C. J. (1988). The tissue and dietary protein and amino acid requirements of pigs from 8.0 to 20.0 kg live weight. Animal Production 46, 283–290.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. & Wang, T. C. (1987). Amino acid requirements of the growing pig. In Manipulating Pig Production, pp. 97–111 [Barnett, J. L., Batterham, E. S., Cronin, G. M., Hansen, C., Hemsworth, P. H., Hennessy, D. P., Hughes, P. E., Johnston, N. E. and King, R. H., editors]. Ferntree Gully: JFL Promotions.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. W. & Brown, W. O. (1970). The retention of energy and protein in the baby pig fed on cows' milk. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, pp. 161–164 [Schurch, A. and Wenk, C., editors]. Zurich: Juris.Google Scholar
Kimura, F. T. & Miller, V. I. (1957). Improved determination of chromic oxide in cow feed and faeces. Agriculture, Food and Chemistry 5, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibholz, J. (1985). An evaluation of total and digestible lysine as a predictor of lysine availability in protein concentrates for young pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 615–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, W. C. & Ozimek, L. (1986). Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, K. (1978). Cause and control of losses of chromium during nitric-perchloric acid oxidation of aquatic sediments. Analyst 103, 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing Committee on Agriculture (1987). Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock. Pigs. East Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Tanksley, T. D. & Knabe, D. A. (1981). Use of cottonseed meal in swine rations. Feedstuffs 53, 24–27.Google Scholar
Taverner, M. R., Curie, D. M. & Rayner, C. J. (1983). A comparison of the extent and site of energy and protein digestion of wheat, lupin and meat and bone meal by pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed