Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:31:19.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Threonine metabolism in sheep

1. Threonine catabolism and gluconeogenesis in mature Blackface wethers given poor quality hill herbage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. R. Egan ,
J. C. MacRae  and
C. S. Lamb
A. R. Egan
Affiliation:
The Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY, Scotland
J. C. MacRae
Affiliation:
The Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY, Scotland
C. S. Lamb
Affiliation:
The Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY, Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In three experiments, mature Blackface wethers were given freeze-stored Agrostis festuca herbage by continuous feeder.

2. In Expt 1, on separate occasions [U-14C]threonine, [U-14C]glucose and NaH14CO3 were infused over 12 h periods to obtain estimates of irreversible loss rate (ILR) of threonine, glucose and carbon dioxide in the plasma and of the exchange of C between these metabolites.

3. In Expts 2 and 3, during periods when glucose and threonine metabolism were examined, glucose loss across the kidneys (23–29 g/d) was induced by infusion of phloridzin.

4. Results from the four sheep used in Expts 1 and 3 are presented as three-pool models. They indicate that threonine ILR (7·8 g/d; 3·1 g C/d) was approximately three times the estimated rate of absorption of exogenous threonine (1 g C/d). Glucose ILR was approximately 76 g/d (mean ± SE; 30·3 ± 0·57 g C/d). Only 0·3% of the glucose-C (0·09 g/d) was derived directly from threonine-C (i.e. 3% of the threonine-C ILR). Bicarbonate ILR was 170 ± 7·3 g C/d, and glucose contributed 11·1 ± 3·52 g C/d to this, accounting for 51 ± 4·4% of glucose-C ILR. Threonine contributed 0·20 ± 0·026 g C/d to the bicarbonate-C ILR, accounting for only 6·4 ± 0·87% of the threonine-C ILR.

5. When, in Expts 2 and 3, phloridzin was infused, glucose ILR was increased by 28 ± 1·5% and bicarbonate ILR was increased by 13 ± 2·4%. Threonine ILR (3·1 g C/d) was not increased, but the metabolic distribution of threonine-C was altered. The transfer of threonine-C into glucose and CO2 was increased by 39 and 69% respectively to 0·125 and 0·45 g C/d, accounting for 4 and 13% of the threonine ILR respectively.

6. Both technical and metabolic considerations which affect interpretation of these results in terms of rates of catabolism of threonine and of quantitative estimates of gluconeogenesis from threonine are discussed.

Type
Paper on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , May 1983 , pp. 373 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Black, A. L., Egan, A. R., Anand, R. S. & Chapman, T. E. (1968). Isotope Studies on the Nitrogen Chain, p. 247. Vienna; International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Bloxham, D. L. (1975). Am. J. Physiol. 229, 1718.Google Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1980). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 39, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & MacRae, J. C. (1978). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37, 15A.Google Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Walker, D. (1975). Proc. 3rd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod. p. 551.Google Scholar
Fennessy, O. (1976). Post-ruminal amino acid supplementation to sheep fed roughage diets. PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Huggett, A. St G. & Nixon, D. A. (1957). Lancet 273, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. B. (1965). Analyt. Biochem. 12, 249.Google Scholar
Krebs, H. A. (1964). In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, vol. 2, p. 125 [Morris, H. N. and Allison, J. B., editors]. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. (1970). Adv. vet. Sci. 14, 209.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. & Leonard, G. J. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 469.Google Scholar
Lin, S. E. & Greenberg, D. M. (1954). J. gen. Physiol. 38, 181.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. B. (1959). Vet. Rev. 5, 103.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Egan, A. R. (1980). Publ. Eur. Ass. Amin. Prod. no. 26, p. 421.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Egan, A. R. (1983). Br. J. Nutr. 49, 385.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C., Milne, J. A., Wilson, S. & Spence, A. M. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 525.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C., Ulyatt, M. J., Pearce, P. D. & Hendtlass, J. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Wilson, S. (1978). Int. J. appl. Rad. Isotopes 29, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. L., Buttery, P. J. & Lindsay, D. B. (1977). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36, 20A.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V., Norton, B. W. & Leng, R. A. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 127.Google Scholar
Sayre, F. W. & Greenberg, D. M. (1956). J. biol. Chem. 220, 787.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., MacRae, J. C. & Buttery, P. J. (1981). Res. vet. Sci. 30, 205.Google Scholar