Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:29:10.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sulphur and cystine incorporation into rumen microbial protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. P. McMeniman ,
D. Ben-Ghedalia  and
R. Elliott
N. P. McMeniman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
D. Ben-Ghedalia
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
R. Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In three series of experiments, Na235SO4 was infused into the rumen of sheep consuming a variety of diets. The specific activity of the sulphur in the rumen H2S pool, rumen bacteria and of the S in bacterial cystine were determined.

2. The results showed that, depending upon the diet, the proportion of total sulphur and cystine sulphur in rumen bacteria originating in the rumen H2S pool could be as low as 0.557 and 0.280 respectively.

Type
Short Papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , November 1976 , pp. 571 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1976

References

Beever, D. E., Harrison, D. G., Thomson, D. J., Cammell, S. B. & Osbourn, D. F. (1974). Br. J. Nutr 32, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P. R. & Fountain, R. D. (1970). Analyst. 95, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, G. S. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 149 [McDonald, T. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. University of New England (Australia) Publ. Unit.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. (1975). Newsletter on the Application of Nuclear Methods to Biology and Agriculture, no. 5, p. 6.Google Scholar
Gawthorne, J. M. & Nader, C. J. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, I. D. (1974). Aust. J. agric. Res. 25, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathison, G. W. & Milligan, L. P. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 25, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, R. J. (1969). In Symposium of Sulphur in Nutrition, p. 165 [Muth, O. H. editor]. Westport, Connecticut: A.V.I. Publ. Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Nader, C. J. & Walker, D. J. (1970). Appl. Microbiol. 20, 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, A. F., Gray, F. V., Weller, R. A. & Belling, C. B. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittman, K. A. & Bryant, M. A. (1964). J. Bacteriol. 88, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar