Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:34:10.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the nutrition of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) Magnesium deficiency: the effect of feeding with a Mg-supplemented diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. Knox ,
C. B. Cowey  and
J. W. Adron
D. Knox
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, St Fittick's Road, Aberdeen AB1 3RA
C. B. Cowey
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, St Fittick's Road, Aberdeen AB1 3RA
J. W. Adron
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, St Fittick's Road, Aberdeen AB1 3RA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. For a period of 8 weeks, rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri), mean initial weight 21 g, were given either a low-magnesium or control diet containing 0·03 and 0·58 g Mg/kg diet respectively. Both groups of trout were then given the control diet for a further 11 weeks.

2. Weight gains over the initial 8-week period were lowest in the Mg-deficient trout. Feeding the deficient fish the control diet rapidly improved growth rate until it was the same as that of the control trout.

3. Plasma Mg was significantly lower in the Mg-deficient trout at week 8. Feeding with the control diet for 11 weeks did not increase plasma Mg. Few changes were observed in the plasma concentrations of the other electrolytes.

4. Renal calcium concentrations were unaffected by dietary Mg levels. Similarly, the renal levels of phosphorus, sodium and potassium all fell within the range found in normal rainbow trout.

5. Muscle Mg concentrations were reduced in those trout given the Mg-deficient diet. Feeding with the control diet for a further 11 weeks increased muscle Mg but the level was still significantly lower than that found in trout given the control diet for 19 weeks.

6. The bone ash Mg concentration was significantly lower, and the Ca higher, in the deficient fish at week 8, when compared with the control group.

7. When compared with the value at the start of the experiment, total bone Mg fell slightly in the deficient trout over the initial 8-week period, but increased in the control group of fish. Feeding with the control diet for a further 11 weeks increased total bone Mg in both Mg-deficient trout and control trout.

8. The results show that the Mg deficiency imposed on the rainbow trout was of limited severity and almost complete recovery was obtained when the control diet was fed.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , July 1983 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Adron, J. W., Blair, A., Cowey, C. B. & Shanks, A. M. (1976). Aquaculture 7, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowey, C. B., Adron, J. W., Blair, A. & Shanks, A. M. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 31, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowey, C. B., Adron, J. W. & Youngson, A. (1983). Aquaculture 30, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowey, C. B., Knox, D., Adron, J. W., George, S. & Pirie, B. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 127–135.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. W. F., Giroux, A., L'Abbé, M. R. & Nera, E. A. (1981). Nutrition Reports International 24, 993–1000.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1950). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
George, G. A. & Heaton, F. W. (1975). Biochemical Journal 152, 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, D., Cowey, C. B. & Adron, J. W. (1981 a). British Journal of Nutrition 45, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, D., Cowey, C. B. & Adron, J. W. (1981 b). British Journal of Nutrition 46, 495–501.Google Scholar
Knox, D., Cowey, C. B. & Adron, J. W. (1982). Aquaculture 27, 111–119.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, I. & Davidsson, D. (1958). Biochemical Journal 70, 456–462.Google Scholar
Martindale, L. & Heaton, F. W. (1964). Biochemical Journal 92, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogino, C., Takashima, F. & Chiou, J. Y. (1978). Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 44, 1105–1108.Google Scholar
Ophaug, R. H. & Singer, L. (1976). Journal of Nutrition 106, 771–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayssiguier, Y. & Larvor, P. (1978). Annales de Biologie Animale Biochemie et Biophysique 18, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar