Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:04:59.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of the large intestine of sheep

1. Fermentation and absorption in sections of the large intestine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

R. M. Dixon  and
J. V. Nolan
R. M. Dixon
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, The University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
J. V. Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, The University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Fermentation and absorption of constituents of digesta in segments of the large intestine of sheep given different diets were studied by analysis of gut contents obtained at slaughter after a period during which the sheep had been administered a non-absorbable gut marker.

2. In sheep given chopped, dried lucerne (Medicago sativa) there was net absorption of water throughout the large intestine with concomitant increases in the proportion of dry matter (DM) And organic matter (OM). There was net disappearance of 62 g OM, 1·66 g non-urea non-ammonia-nitrogen (NU–NAN) and 0·6 g(urea + NH3)-N in the caecum and proximal colon. There was no significant change in OM and NU–NAN flow through the remainder of the large intestine but there was a net disappearance of 0·3 g NH3–N. There was also net appearance of volatile fatty acids (VFA) in the caecum, most of which was apparently absorbed before the rectum.

3. Metabolism in the caecum was also studied in sheep grazing fresh pasture or consuming one of three sugar cane-bagasse-based diets, or barley pellets. In the lucerne- and pasture-fed sheep there was a net disappearance of approximately 0·5 g NH3-N/d from the caecum, while in sheep fed on bagasse plus urea, 1·4 g NH3-N/d was apparently absorbed from this region. The addition of fish meal to this latter diet resulted in apparent disappearance of 5·3 g NH3-N/d from the caecum and proximal colon.

4. There was apparent loss of NU–NAN from the caecum of sheep on all diets except the barley diet. With the latter diet there was a net gain of 1 g NU–NAN/d which was associated with relatively high VFA concentration and production; taken together these results indicate that microbial fermentation in the caecum was more extensive in the sheep fed on the barley diet than in those fed on the other diets.

5. The proportions of individual VFA in digesta from the rumen and caecum of lucerne-fed and pasture-fed sheep and in digesta from the caecum of sheep given the bagasse-based or barley diets are also reported and discussed.

6. In general the results indicate that the caecum and to a lesser extent the proximal colon were the major regions of fermentation and absorption of the components of the digesta in the large intestine.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , March 1982 , pp. 289 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

Annison, E. F. (1954). Biochem. J. 57, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed.Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Badawy, A. M., Campbell, R. M., Cuthbertson, D. P. & Fell, B. F. (1957). Nature, Lond. 180, 756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badawy, A. M., Campbell, R. M., Cuthbertson, D. P., Fell, B. F. & MacKie, W. S. (1958). Br. J. Nutr. 12, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, N. T. & Stevenson, A. E. (1964). N. Z. Jl agric. Res. 7, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho da Silva, J. F., Seeley, R. C., Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. & Armstrong, D. G. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R., Hitchcock, M. W. S., Marshall, R. A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1946). J. exp. Biol. 22, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, E. S., Marco, G. J. & Emery, E. M. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1968). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 21, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1969). Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Fell, B. F. (1961). J. Path. Bact. 81, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Hecker, J. F. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, J. F. (1969). Aust. vet J. 45, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, J. F. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, J. F. & Grovum, W. L. (1971). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 24, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Phillipson, A. T. (1960). Br. J. Nutr. 14, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, T. J. (1979). Protein nutrition and metabolism of the growing lamb. Ph.D. thesis. University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. & Preston, T. R. (1976). Trop. Anim. Prod. 1, 1.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C., Reid, C. S. W., Dellow, D. W. & Wyburn, R. S. (1973). Res. vet. Sci. 14, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Kirsh, E. (1957). Am. J. clin. Path. 28, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, L. L., Jackson, H. D. & Packett, L. V. (1967). J. Anim. Sci. 26, 1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C., Mason, V. C. & Mann, S. O. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed.Ames, Iowa, USA: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. E. & DeLangen, H. (1960). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 3, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Coelho da Silva, J. F. & Armstrong, D. G. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, R. A., Pilgrim, A. F. & Gray, F. V. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, V. J. (1965). Aust. J. agric. Res. 16, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar