Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:08:50.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep, and on related problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. L. Blaxter ,
N. McC. Graham  and
F. W. Wainman
K. L. Blaxter
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
N. McC. Graham
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
F. W. Wainman
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 1956 , pp. 69 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1956

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. (1950). Brit. J. Nutr. 4, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1954). J. Dairy Res. 21, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1944). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2nd Mtg, p. 85.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1950–1951). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 20, 1.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1955 a). J. agric. Sci. 46, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1955 b). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, xv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 15. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Bohstedt, G., Roche, B. H., Rupel, I. W. & Fuller, J. G. (1930). Bull. Univ. Wis. Sci. Ser. no. 10.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H. & Mead, S. W. (1943). Science, 98, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, P. V. & Smith, F. H. (1917). J. agric. Res. 10, 2.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Fries, J. A. & Braman, W. W. (1925). J. agric. Res. 31, 987.Google Scholar
Heller, V. G., Wall, R. & Briggs, H. M. (1911). Tech. Bull. Okla. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 10.Google Scholar
Kick, C. H., Gerlaugh, P., Schalk, A. F. & Silver, A. (1937). J. agric. Res. 55, 587.Google Scholar
Lehmann, F. (1941). Z. Tierernähr. 5, 155.Google Scholar
Lenkeit, W. (1930). Arch. Tierernähr. Tierz. 2, 626.Google Scholar
Mead, S. W. & Goss, H. (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1952). J. Physiol. 116, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piana, C. (1952). Zootec. e Vet. 11, 12.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Harris, C. E. & Harker, V. G. (1953). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 8, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1954). In Festschrift annlässlich des 100 jährigen Bestehens der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchsstation Leipzig-Möckern. Vol. 2. 100 Jahre Möckern. Die Bewertung der Futterstoffe und andere Probleme der Tierernährung, p. 233. [Nehring, K. editor.] Berlin: Deutscher Bauernverlag.Google Scholar
Swanson, E. W. & Herman, H. A. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usuelli, F. (1933). Profilassi, 6, 7.Google Scholar