Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:00:48.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors associated with the difference in nutritive value of artificially dried red clover and perennial ryegrass for sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. Moseley  and
J. R. Jones
G. Moseley
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB
J. R. Jones
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Three sheep fitted with duodenal re-entrant cannulas and three with large rumen fistulas were given red clover, perennial ryegrass and a 2:1 (w/w) mixture of grass and clover in two Latin square arrangements. Measurements were made of voluntary intake, digestibility, flow of nutrients into the duodenum and the flow of Cr-EDTA marker through the reticulo-rumen.

2. Organic matter (OM) digestibility was similar for the three feeds but the voluntary intake decreased in the order mixture > red clover > perennial ryegrass. There was an increase in the rate of marker flow from the rumen and a decrease in retention time of the same order. Rumen volume did not change significantly.

3. There was a reduction in the mean particle size of rumen contents in the order perennial ryegrass > clover > mixture. The in vitro digestibility of particles decreased with size; the reduction being more rapid for clover than perennial ryegrass.

4. The proportion of ingested digestible OM appearing at the duodenum increased from 18.4% to 26.7% to 30.0% for perennial ryegrass, clover and the mixture respectively.

5. A higher proportion of digestible cellulose and hemicellulose disappeared over the stomach for the perennial ryegrass feed compared to the clover and the mixture but over 96% of water soluble carbohydrates and starch disappeared over the stomach for all three feeds.

6. The apparent digestibility of nitrogen was similar for all three feeds but the proportion of undigested feed N appearing at the duodenum was calculated to be greater by a factor of 1.71 and 2.52 for clover and mixture feeds compared to grass.

7. It was concluded that the higher nutritive value of red clover compared to perennial ryegrass was due to an increased rate of flow of nutrients througth the reticulo-rumen and an increase in the proportion of digestible OM digested post ruminally.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , July 1979 , pp. 139 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Axford, R. F. E., Evans, R. A. & Offer, N. W. (1971). Res. vet. Sci. 12, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R. W. (1967). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 10, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Campling, R. C. (1962). Nutr. Abstr. 32, 669.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Thompson, D. J., Pfeffer, E. & Armstrong, D. G. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Martin, A. K. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16. 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J., Goodall, S. D., Kay, R. N. B., Phillipson, A. T. & Vowles, L. E. (1966). Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B. 166, 46.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error, 4th ed. London: Grosby, Lockwood & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1976). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, R. C., Watkin, B. R. & Gallagher, J. R. (1967). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 201.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1975). J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30, 307.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. (1973). Aust. J. ugric. Res. 24, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, I. D. & Purser, D. B. (1974). Aust. J. agric. Res. 26, 199.Google Scholar
Johns, A. T., Ulyatt, M. J. & Glenday, A. C. (1963). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. R. & Moseley, G. (1977). Lab. Pract. 26, 687.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. P. & Newth, R. P. (1967). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 27, 166.Google Scholar
MacLean, J. W., Thomson, G. G., Inversen, C. E., Jagusch, K. T. & Lawson, D. M. (1962). Proc. N.Z. Grassld Ass. 24, 57.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, D. G., Walters, R. J. K. & Evans, E. M. (1969). Anim. Prod. 11, 19.Google Scholar
Moseley, G. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, B. D., Jones, D. I. H. & Hughes, R. (1969). Nature, Lond. 223, 1072.Google Scholar
Pucher, G. W., Leavenworth, C. S. & Vickery, H. B. (1948). Analyt. Chem. 20, 850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V. & Joyce, J. P. (1969). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 29, 102.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1969). Adv. Agron. 21, 1.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. A. (1977). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 28, 639.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J. (1975). J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30, 89.Google Scholar
Thornton, F. R. & Minson, D. J. (1972). Aust. J. agric. Res. 23, 871.Google Scholar
Thornton, F. R. & Minson, D. J. (1973). Aust. J. agric. Res. 24, 889.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, E. A. (1963). J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18, 104.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B. & Goodall, E. D. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 261.Google Scholar
Troelson, J. E. (1967). System for estimating the nutritional quality of hay for domestic ruminants. Ph.D. thesis, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Troelson, E. & Bigsby, F. W. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 1139.Google Scholar
Troelson, J. E. & Campbell, J. B. (1968). Anim. Prod. 10, 289.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. (1969). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 29, 114.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. (1971). N.Z. Jl. agric. Res. 14, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. & MacRae, J. C. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1966). J. ass. off. agric. Chem. 49, 546.Google Scholar
Walker, D. J., Egan, A. R., Nader, C. J., Ulyatt, M. J. & Stover, G. B. (1975). Aust. J. agric. Res. 26, 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1967). Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 789.Google Scholar
Williams, C. H., David, D. J. & Iismaa, O. (1962). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar