Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:49:01.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sodium and potassium intakes in a representative population sample: estimation from 24 h urine collections known to be complete in a Cambridgeshire village

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. R. R. Williams  and
Sheila A. Bingham
D. R. R. Williams
Affiliation:
University Department of Community Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
Sheila A. Bingham
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, 100 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QL
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A representative sample of eighty men aged 25–44 years from a Cambridgeshire village, each carried out one 24-h urine collection which was analysed for sodium, potassium, creatinine and urea content. The completeness of the collections was verified using oral doses of p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA; the PABA check test).

2. In the seventy-one collections shown to be complete, the average 24 h excretion of Na was 172 mmol and the average 24 h excretion of K was 74 mmol.

3. Fifty-one of these men's wives also made complete 24 h collections. The average content of these was 128 mmol Na and 61 mmol K.

4. Self reports and creatinine index would have identified as incomplete only 29 and 14% respectively of collections so judged by PABA.

5. Average excretion of 150 mmol Na/d was similar to estimated intakes of 140–167 mmol/d from the National Food Survey (Bull & Buss, 1980).

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 13 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Arvanitakis, C., Longnecker, M. P. & Folscroft, J. (1978). Journal of Laboratory & Clinical Medicine 91, 467–472.Google Scholar
Beevers, D. G., Hawthorne, V. M. & Padfield, P. L. (1980). British Medical Journal 281, 641–642.Google Scholar
Bingham, S. A. & Cummings, J. H. (1983). Clinical Science 64, 629–635.Google Scholar
Bingham, S. A. & Cummings, J. H. (1984). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 80A.Google Scholar
Bull, N. L. & Buss, D. H. (1980). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 30A.Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. & Widdowson, E. M. (1972). Lancet i, 711–715.Google Scholar
Druce, E. (1983). Proceedings of 6th International Salt CongressTorontoJune 1983.Google Scholar
Edwards, O. M., Bayliss, R. I. S. & Millen, S. (1969). Lancet ii, 1165–1166.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. (1966) Health Physics 12, 843–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joossens, J. V. & Geboers, J. (1983). In Surveillance of the Dietary Habits of the Population with Regard to Cardiovascular Diseases, EuroNut Report no. 2, pp. 61–73.[De Backer, G. G., Tunstall Pedoe, H. and Ducimetiere, P, editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Department of Human Nutrition, University of Wageningen.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1980). Household Food Consumption and Expenditure, 1978. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
National Advisory Committee on Nutrition Education (1983). Lancet ii, 835–838.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys(1973). Census 1971. Economic Activity Part IV. London:H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Castillo, C. P., Warrender, S., Whitehead, T. & James, W. P. T. (1984).Proceedings of the NutritionGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J., Harper, P. H., Radin, M. E., Caggiula, A. W., McDonald, R. H. & Diven, W. F. (1980).Hypertension 2, 695–699.Google Scholar
Tune, B. M., Burg, M. B. & Patlak, C. S. (1969). American Journal of Physiology 217, 1057–1063.Google Scholar
Weinfeld, R. E. & Lee, T. L. (1979). Journal of Pharmacological Sciences 68, 1387–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar