Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:21:17.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of organic sulphur in the copper-molybdenum-S interrelationship in ruminant nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. F. Suttle
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, Gilmerton Road, Edinburgh EH17 7FH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The ability of organic and inorganic sulphur to influence the copper and molybdenum metabolism of sheep was compared in a series of three 2 × 2 factorial design experiments. In each experiment, four groups of five to seven hypocupraemic ewes were repleted with a basal diet supplemented with 6 mg Cu/kg and containing S and Mo at one of two concentrations, 1 or 4 g S and 0.5 or 4.5 mg Mo/kg respectively. Sodium sulphate (Expt 1), methionine (Expt 2) or cysteine (Expt 3) were used as the S sources. Cu and Mo concentrations in plasma were estimated in each experiment and in Expt 3 the concentrations of Cu in liver and Mo in urine were also estimated.

2. The effects of the three S sources on Cu and Mo metabolism were similar. Repletion of the plasma Cu pool was unaffected by Mo alone, reduced by S alone and totally inhibited by Mo + S. Plasma Mo was greatly increased by Mo supplements, slightly decreased by S supplements and unaffected by Mo and S supplements given together.

3. In Expt 3 the treatments were found to affect urinary Mo and plasma Mo in a similar manner; S prevented dietary Mo from increasing Mo excretion. The only group to show a significant repletion of the liver Cu pool was that given Mo alone.

4. Supplementation of the diet with organic S significantly reduced the within-treatment variation in plasma Cu and Mo, liver Cu and urinary Mo.

5. It is suggested that variations in dietary S and Mo within the normal range for herbage affect the Cu and Mo metabolism of the grazing animal, and that total S rather than inorganic S is the more useful measurement in the context of the Cu–Mo–S interrelationship.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

Allcroft, R. & Lewis, G. (1956). Landbouwk. Tijdschr., 's-Grav. 68, 711.Google Scholar
Bingley, J. B. & Anderson, N. (1972). Aust. J. agric. Res. 23, 885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingley, J. B. & Dick, A. T. (1967). J. agric. Fd Chem. 15, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P. R. (1970). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8, 212.Google Scholar
Bird, P. R. & Hume, I. D. (1971). Aust. J. agric. Res. 22, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsnes, R. W. & Taussky, H. H. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 158, 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, M. S. M. (1965). Jaarb. Inst. biol. scheik. Onderz. LandbGewass. p. 97.Google Scholar
Bosman, M. S. M. (1966). Jaarb. Inst. biol. scheik. Onderz. LandbGewass. p. 73.Google Scholar
Bryden, J. McG. & Bray, A. C. (1972). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 9, 335.Google Scholar
Cook, G. A., Lesperance, A. L., Bohman, V. R. & Jensen, E. H. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1944). Aust. vet. J. 20, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1953 a). Aust. vet. J. 29, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1953 b). Aust. vet. J. 29, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1956). Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism, p. 445. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Field, A. C., Sykes, A. R. & Gunn, R. G. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 83, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furrer, O. J. (1966). Schweiz. Landw. Mh. 44, 125.Google Scholar
Gray, L. F. & Daniel, L. J. (1964). J. Nutr. 84, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmans, J. (1970). In Trace Element Metabolism in Animals, p. 441 [Mills, C.F. editor]. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Hartmans, J. & Bosman, M. S. M. (1970). In Trace Element Metabolism in Animals, p. 362 [Mills, C. F. editor]. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Hogan, K. G., Money, D. F. L. & Blayney, A. (1968). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 11, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisingh, J., Gomez, G. G. & Matrone, G. (1973). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 32, 1921.Google Scholar
Hume, I. D. (1974). Aust. J. agric. Res. 25, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, I. D. & Bird, P. R. (1970). Aust. J. agric. Res. 21, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. D., Hays, V. W. & Cromwell, G. L. (1971). J. Anim. Sci. 33, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachicha Garrido, M. (1964). Analyst, Lond. 89, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. R., Lesperance, A. L., Bohman, V. R. & Jensen, E. H. (1970). J. Anim. Sci. 30, 1032.Google Scholar
Mills, C. F. (1960). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miltimore, J. E. & Mason, J. L. (1971). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mottershead, B. E. (1971). Lab. Pract. 20, 483.Google Scholar
Ross, D. B. (1966). Br. vet. J. 122, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. S. W. & Wright, H. (1974). Clinica chim. Acta. 50, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, 5th ed., p. 291. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. E. & Hardwick, A. J. (1967). Analyst, Lond. 92, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 69..Google Scholar
Suttle, N. F. (1974 b). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. (1974 c). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. & Field, A. C. (1968). J. comp. Path. 78, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. & Field, A. C. (1969). J. comp. Path. 79, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F., Thornton, I. & Alloway, B. J. (1975). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. & Blanchflower, J. (1971). Lab. Pract. 20, 100.Google Scholar
Thornton, I., Kershaw, G. F. & Davies, M. K. (1972). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, J. R. (1972). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E. J. (1972). Trace Elements in Human and Animal Nutrition, p. 123. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. C. (1966). Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. no. 4, p. 21.Google Scholar