Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:35:50.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of lipogenic enzymes to intensity and duration of overfeeding in the adult Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

Niva Shapira ,
I. Nir  and
P. BUDOWSKI
Niva Shapira
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
I. Nir
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
P. BUDOWSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Adult male Japanese quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica) were overfed at different intensities during varying periods: (1) by gradually increasing the daily amount of food up to twice the control level in a period of 11 d and keeping this level constant during the subsequent 12 d period (prolonged overfeeding); (2) by gradually increasing the daily amount of food up to approximately twice the control level in a period of 6 d (short, low-intensity overfeeding; SL); (3) by gradually increasing the daily amount of food up to approximately 2.5-fold the control level in a period of 7 d (short, high-intensity overfeeding; SH).

2. The activities of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2; CBX), fatty acid synthetase (FAS), ATP citrate lyase (EC 4.1.3.8; CCE) and malate dehydrogenase (decarboxylating) (NADP) (EC 1.1.1.40; ME) were determined in adipose tissue (AT) and liver of the overfed and ad lib.- fed chicks. Size and fat content of carcass, AT and liver were also determined in order to evaluate the extent of obesity.

3. The weight of carcass, lean body mass, liver and AT and the extent of fat deposition increased with the total amount of food consumed. Obesity was particularly pronounced in quail after prolonged overfeeding.

4. Lipogenic enzymes in liver were much more active than those of AT. The specific activities of CBX, FAS and CCE in liver and AT in overfed Japanese quail increased consistently in the SL and SH groups only and the increase was related to the level of food intake in these groups. ME was the only enzyme whose specific activity increased in all overfed groups. Total AT enzyme activities were increased most strongly after prolonged overfeeding because of the pronounced tissue enlargement in that treatment. But in liver, where tissue enlargement was less and differences in size due to the three overfeeding treatments were less marked, total activities depended mainly on the enhancement of specific activities.

5. The results lead to the conclusion that the increase in hepatic lipogenic enzymes roughly reflects the current food intake and may thus be considered to represent the primary adaptation in the overfed Japanese quail. Secondary adaptation, involving tissue enlargement, occurs principally in AT of Japanese quail after prolonged overfeeding, in which situation AT contributes significantly to total lipogenic activity.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , March 1978 , pp. 289 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. B., Dauffman, R. G. & Kastenschmidt, L. L. (1972). J. Lipid Res. 13, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakshinamurti, K. & Desjardins, P. R. (1969). Biochim. biophys. Acta 176, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodridge, A. G. (1968). Am. J. Physiol. 214, 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodridge, A. G. & Ball, E. G. (1966). Am. J. Physiol. 221, 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S., Dorsey, J. A., Mursing, R. A. & Porter, J. W. (1970). J. biol. Chem. 245, 4732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveille, G. A., Romsos, D. R., Yeh, Y. Y. & O'Hea, E. K. (1975). Poult. Sci. 54, 1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nir, I. (1977). Br. Poult. Sci. 18, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nir, I., Dror, Y., Nitsan, Z. & Shapira, N. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Nir, I., Shapira, N., Nitsan, Z. & Dror, Y. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa, S. (1955). Meth. Enzym. 1, 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hea, E. K. & Leveille, G. A. (1968). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 26, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapira, N., Nir, I. & Budowski, P. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Snapir, N., Nir, I., Furuta, F. & Lepkovsky, S. (1969). Endocrinology 84, 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snapir, N., Nir, I., Furuta, F. & Lepkovsky, S. (1974). Gen. Comp. Endocr. 24, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srere, P. A. (1962). Meth. Enzym. 5, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, S. J. C. & Leveille, G. A. (1972). J. Nutr. 102, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, S. J. C. & Leveille, G. A. (1973). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 142, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zöllner, N. & Kirsch, K. (1962). Z. ges. Exp. Med. 135, 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar