Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:33:02.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproducibility of 24 h energy expenditure measurements using a human whole body indirect calorimeter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Janna O. De Boer ,
Aren J. H. Van Es ,
Joop E. Vogt ,
Joop M. A. Van Raaij  and
Joseph G. A. J. Hautvast
Janna O. De Boer
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Agricultural University, Haarweg 10, 6709 PJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
Aren J. H. Van Es
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Agricultural University, Haarweg 10, 6709 PJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
Joop E. Vogt
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Agricultural University, Haarweg 10, 6709 PJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
Joop M. A. Van Raaij
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Joseph G. A. J. Hautvast
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Ten female subjects completed two similar experimental procedures (periods 1 and 2) to obtain values of reproducibility of energy intake and 24 h energy expenditure (24hEE) measurements in a whole body indirect calorimeter. The periods consisted of consumption of a provided weight-maintenance diet for 6–8 d, faeces and urine collection during the last 4 d and occupation of the calorimeter during the last 3 d. The daily routine inside the calorimeter simulated a sedentary day in normal life with some physical activity: 8 h sleep, 75 min bicycling and the remaining time spent on sedentary activities. The metabolizable energy (ME) content of the diet (14% energy as protein, 46% energy as carbohydrate, 40% energy as fat) was calculated using food tables. The actual ME intake as well as digestibility and metabolizability of the diet were obtained later by analyses of food, faeces and urine for energy. Three consecutive 24hEE measurements were performed during the stay in the calorimeter in each period. The time interval between the two periods varied from 2 to 24 months. Reproducibility was assessed at group and individual level.

2. Mean digestibility and metabolizability of the diet showed no significant difference between periods. The within-subject coefficient of variation of metabolizability between periods was 1.7%.

3. Mean 24hEE (MJ) over 3 d did not differ between period 1 (8.78 (SD 0.63)) and period 2 (8.73 (SD 0.66)). The within-subject coefficient of variation in mean 24hEE over three successive days between periods was 3.1% but decreased, after deletion of values for subjects who were less adapted to the calorimeter, to 1.9%.

4. The results are discussed with regard to length of trial and the number of subjects required to test a difference in energy metabolism using whole body indirect calorimeters.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 201 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

Bessard, T., Schutz, Y. & Jequier, E. (1983). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 38, 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisdee, J. T. & James, W. P. T. (1983). In Program and Abstracts of Fourth International Congress on Obesity, New York, 52A.Google Scholar
Blaza, S. E. (1980). Thermogenesis in lean and obese individuals. PhD Thesis, CNAA.Google Scholar
Blaza, S. & Garrow, J. S. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 171–180.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1965). In Proceedings of 3rd Symposium on Energy Metabolism, European Association of Animal Production. Publication no. 11, pp. 441–443 [Blaxter, K. L. editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dallosso, H. M. & James, W. P. T. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 52, 49–64.Google Scholar
Dallosso, H. M., Murgatroyd, P. R. & James, W. P. T. (1982). Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 36C, 25–39.Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 43, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. & Bingham, S. A. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutch Food Composition Table (1981). Nederlandse Voedingsmiddelen Tabel. 33rd ed. Den Haag: Voorlichtingsbureau voor de Voeding.Google Scholar
Garby, L., Lammert, O. & Nielsen, E. (1984). Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 38C, 391–394.Google Scholar
Garrow, J. S. & Webster, J. D. (1985). In Human Energy Metabolism: Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure Measurements in Epidemiological Research Based Upon Direct and Indirect Calorimetry, Euro-Nut Report no. 5, pp. 215–224 [Van Es, A. J. H., editor]. Wageningen: The Netherlands Nutrition Foundation.Google Scholar
Hofstetter, A., Schutz, Y., Wahren, J. & Jequier, E. (1983). In Program and Abstracts of Fourth International Congress on Obesity, New York, 28A.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (1979). International Standard no. 5983.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Norgan, N. G. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1980). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 978–988.Google Scholar
Owen, D. B. (1962). Handbook of Statistical Tables. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H., Vogt, J. E., Niessen, Ch., Veth, J., Rodenburg, L., Teeuwse, V., Dhuyvetter, J., Deurenberg, P., Hautvast, J. G. A. J. & Van der Beek, E. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 52, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P. (1985). In Human Energy Metabolism: Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure Measurements in Epidemiological Research Based Upon Direct and Indirect Calorimetry. Euro-Nut Report no. 5, pp. 30–31 [Van Es, A. J. H., editor]. Wageningen: The Netherlands Nutrition Foundation.Google Scholar
Webb, P. & Abrams, T. (1983). Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 37C, 271–282.Google Scholar
Webb, P. & Annis, J. F. (1983). Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 37C, 117–131.Google Scholar