Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:18:19.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A reappraisal of the ocular lesion known as Bitot's spot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

F. C. Rodger
Affiliation:
Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh University, India
H. Saiduzzafar
Affiliation:
Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh University, India
A. D. Grover
Affiliation:
Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh University, India
A. Fazal
Affiliation:
Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh University, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1963

References

REFERENCES

Applemans, M., Lebas, P. & Missotten, A. (1956). Bull. Soc. belge Ophtal. 113, 327.Google Scholar
Aydelotte, M. B. (1963). J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 11, 279.Google Scholar
Berliner, M. L. (1949). Biomicroscopy of the Eye. Vol. 1, p. 167. New York: Paul B. Hoeber Inc.Google Scholar
Bitot, C. (1863). Gaz. hebd. Méd. Chir. 10, 284.Google Scholar
Bloch, C. E. (1921 a). Jb. Kinderheilk. 89, 405.Google Scholar
Bloch, C. E. (1921 b). J. Hyg., Camb., 19, 283.Google Scholar
Burch, H. B., Salcedo, J., Carrasco, E. O. & Intengan, C. L. (1952). J. Nutr. 46, 239.Google Scholar
Evetzki, A. (1890). Arch. Ophtal., Paris, July/August, p. 377.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, H. & Benischek, M. (1927). J. exp. Med. 46, 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S. P. (1956). Report of All-India Ophthalmological Conference, p. 91. New Delhi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Herbert, G. H. (1897). Indian med. Gaz. 32, 130.Google Scholar
Hubbenet, M. (1860). Ann. Oculist., Paris, 44, 293.Google Scholar
McCollum, E. V. & Simmonds, N. (1917). J. biol. Chem. 32, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, D. S. (1960). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19, 89.Google Scholar
Moore, T. (1957). Vitamin A, p. 586. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nicholls, L. & Nimalasuriya, A. (1939). Lancet, 236, 1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oomen, H. A. P. C. (1958). Fed. Proc. 17, Suppl. no. 2, p. 111.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. B. & Mendel, L. B. (1921). J. Amer. med. Ass. 76, 905.Google Scholar
Pillat, A. (1929 a). Nat. med. J. China, 15, 614.Google Scholar
Pillat, A. (1929 b). Nat. med. J. China, 15, 588.Google Scholar
Rodger, F. C. (1958). Brit. J. Ophthal. 42, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodger, F. C. (1960). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19, 80.Google Scholar
Rodger, F. C., Dhir, P. K. & Hosain, A. T. M. M. (1960). Arch. Ophthal., Chicago, 63, 927.Google Scholar
Saemisch, T. (1876). Handb. Augenheilk. 4, 128.Google Scholar
Snell, S. (18801881). Trans. ophthal. Soc. U. K. 1, 207.Google Scholar
Stephenson, S. (1898). Trans. ophthal. Soc. U. K. 18, 55.Google Scholar
Tobgy, A. F. (1935). Bull. Soc. Ophtal. Égypte, 28, 79.Google Scholar
Treacher Collins, E. (1930). Trans. ophthal. Soc. U. K. 50, 201.Google Scholar
Yap-Kie-Tiong, (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 158.Google Scholar