Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:22:43.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protein requirements of growing lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. L. Black
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, School of Agriculture, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
G. R. Pearce
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, School of Agriculture, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
D. E. Tribe
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, School of Agriculture, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The protein requirements of lambs were established by measuring nitrogen balance in seventy-four animals given liquid diets which passed direct to the abomasum. Four groups of lambs weighing approximately 8 kg (group 1), 13 kg (group 2), 21 kg (group 3) and 30 kg (group 4) received diets in which 0·10, 0·15, 0·20, 0·25, 0·30, 0·35 or 0·40 of the digestible energy was provided as protein (DPE:DE ratio) and a gross energy intake of from 1·30 to 1·42 MJ/kg0·73 per d.

2. When the protein requirements were taken to correspond to the protein intake at the point of intersection of the line describing the increase in N balance with increase in protein intake and the line representing the maximum N balance, values of 0·25, 0·23, 0·17 and 0·12 DPE:DE ratio were obtained for groups 1–4 respectively. The requirements expressed in these terms can be applied only to lambs fed on liquid diets which contain milk proteins and escape fermentation in the rumen. To enable the results to be applied to lambs given other diets, the requirements were expressed as g reference-protein (defined as a theoretical protein with the ideal pattern of amino acids) per MJ net energy and were 11·6, 10·4, 8·0 and 6·2 for groups 1–4 respectively. The relationship between protein requirement (Y, g reference protein/MJ net energy) and live weight (X, kg) was: Y = 13·4–0·242X.

3. The influence of energy intake on protein requirements in lambs is discussed and it is concluded that the results obtained are applicable to lambs given a metabolizable energy intake of more than about 1·75 times their maintenance requirement.

4. Application of the estimated requirements to ruminant lambs and methods of formulating diets to supply the required quantity of reference protein/MJ net energy are discussed.

Type
General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. P. & Ørskov, E. R. (1970). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, U. S. & Cowgill, G. R. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 73Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Washington: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. (1970). Utilization of Protein and Energy in Growing Lambs. PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Black, J. I., (1971). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30, 7A.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudy, A. & Schiemann, R. (1969). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 12, p. 161.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. M. W., Ellinger, G. M. & Phillipson, A. T. (1966). Proc. Roy. Soc. B 166, 63.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. L. (1966). In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition p. 51 [Abrams, J. T., editor]. London: Churchil.Google Scholar
FAO (1965). F.A.O. nutr. Stud. no. 37.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC. & Searle, T. W. (1970). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8, 263.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC. & Searle, T. W. (1972). Aust. J. agric. Res. 23, 97.Google Scholar
Hegsted, D. M. (1964). In Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Vol. 2, p. 135 [Munro, H. N. and Allison, J. B., editors]. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hegsted, D. M. & Neff, R. (1970). J. Nutr. 100, 1173.Google Scholar
Hinds, F. C., Mansfield, M. E. & Lewis, J. M. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, L. W., Glimp, H. A., Little, C. O. & Woolfolk, P. G. (1969). J. Anim. Sci. 28, 279.Google Scholar
Markowitz, J., Archibald, J. & Downie, H. G. (1964). Experimental Surgery 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Martin, A. K. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C. (1971). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 76, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Payne, P. R. (1963). J. theoret. Biol. 5, 398.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1968). Anim. Prod. 10, 243.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. & McDonald, I. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 25, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, R. L. & Burroughs, W. (1958). J. Anim. Sci. 17, 140.Google Scholar
Ranhotra, G. S. & Jordan, R. M. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, T. F. (1969). Anim. Prod. 11, 453.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. & Forbes, T. J. (1970). Anim. Prod. 12, 95.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1935). J. biol. Chem. 109, 249.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. (1958). Nature, Lond. 182, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1959). Statistical Methods. Ames: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Velu, J. G., Baker, D. H. & Scott, H. M. (1971). J. Nutr. 101, 1249.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Faichney, G. J. (1964 a). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Faichney, G. J. (1964 b). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 295.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Jagusch, K. T. (1969). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 12, p. 187.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Norton, B. W. (1971). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 363.Google Scholar
Waterlow, J. C. (1968). In Calorie Deficiencies and Protein Deficiencies p. 61 [McCance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M., editors]. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Watson, R. H. (1944). Bull. Commonw. scient. ind. Res. Org. 180, I.Google Scholar
Whiting, F. & Bezeau, L. M. (1957). Can.J. Anim. Sci. 37, 95.Google Scholar