Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:34:21.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein quality of some unusual protein foodstuffs. Studies on the African locust-bean seed (Parkia filicoidea Welw.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

B. L. Fetuga ,
G. M. Babatunde  and
V. A. Oyenuga
B. L. Fetuga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
G. M. Babatunde
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
V. A. Oyenuga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The proximate composition, amino acid composition and the quality of the protein of the African locust-bean (Parkia filicoidea Welw.) seed, seed with pulp, and various processed forms, with or without amino acid supplementation, were assessed.

2. The crude protein content of the locust-bean seed was 303 g/kg and the crude fibre content was 121 g/kg.

3. The seeds contained (mg/g protein): 67 lysine, 6.1 methionine and 8.9 tryptophan.

4. Diets containing 100 g protein/kg supplied by the seed did not support growth in rats, demonstrating that the protein was of poor quality.

5. Utilization of the protein of locust-bean seeds was improved by cooking, and by removal of the tough leathery outer testa of the seeds.

6. Supplementation with methionine alone resulted in positive growth and a very substantial increase in protein values.

7. Supplements of methionine and tryptophan caused further improvement in protein quality and increased the growth of rats to almost that obtained with whole egg.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , July 1974 , pp. 27 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1974

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis 11th ed.Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bender, A. E. & Doell, B. H. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Biometrics 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. S. (1963). Publs Natn. Res. Coun., Wash. no. 1100.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1967). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 18, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (1963). Publs Natn. Res. Coun., Wash. no. 1100.Google Scholar
Owusu-Domfeh, K. (1967). Nutritive value of some Ghanaian feedstuffs. MSc Thesis, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Oyenuga, V. A. (1968). Nigeria's Feeds and Feedingstuffs 3rd ed.Ibadan: University Press.Google Scholar
Rippon, W. P. (1959). Br. J. Nutr. 13, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolls, B. A. (1970). Factors influencing the digestion and absorption of protein in the rat. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics p. 99. New York, Toronto and London: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Zimmerman-Nielsen, C. & Schenheyder, F. (1962). Biochim. biophys. Acta 63, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar