Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:37:25.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein, essential amino acids and glycine requirements of the growing gosling (Anser cireneus)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Zafrira Nitsan ,
A. Dvorin  and
I. Nir
Zafrira Nitsan
Affiliation:
Division of Poultry Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rehovot, Israel
A. Dvorin
Affiliation:
Akko Goose Breeding and Research Farm, PO Box 35, Akko, Israel
I. Nir
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The dietary requirements for protein and amino acids of the growing gosling (0–7 weeks) were calculated according to body composition, maintenance needs and the absorption rate of amino acids from feeds.

2. The diets were formulated by least-cost linear programming, using the calculated requirements for amino acids, with or without minimal glycine + serine requirements. The diets formulated without minimal requirements of glycine + serine were supplemented with various amounts of glycine, and fed to growing goslings.

3. The calculated requirements for protein and essential amino acids were lower than those suggested for growing broilers and turkeys. The requirements (g/MJ metabolizable energy) at 0–2, 2–4 and 4–7 weeks of age respectively, were: lysine 0·88, 0·48, 0·43; methionine + cystine 0·48, 0·38, 0·29; protein 14·5, 9·3, 7·6.

4. The goslings did not respond to glycine supplementation of the diet.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 455 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Curtis, D. R. & Crawford, J. M. (1969). Annual Review of Pharmacology 9, 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Biometrics 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, S., Shamir, N. & Bar, A. (1972). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 25, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, S.Sklan, D. & Bartov, I. (1978). Poultry Science 57, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepkovsky, S., Furuta, F., Koike, T., Hasegwa, N., Dimick, M. K., Krause, K. & Barnes, F. J. (1965). British Journal of Nutrition 19, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveille, G. A. & Fisher, M. (1958). Journal of Nutrition 66, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1977). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Nir, I., Shapira, N., Nitsan, Z. & Dror, Y. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsan, Z., Dvorin, A. & Nir, I. (1981 a). British Poultry Science 22, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsan, Z., Dvorin, A. & Nir, I. (1981 b). Poultry Science 60, 2724–2725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. L., Nesheim, M. C. & Young, R. J. (1976). Nutrition of the Chicken. Ithaca, New York: M.L. Scott & Associates.Google Scholar