Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:23:04.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prospective evaluation of lactose malabsorption by lactose hydrogen breath test in individuals infected with and passing cystsEntamoeba histolytica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Satya Vati Rana*
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology and Experimental Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarh 160012, India
Deepak Kumar Bhasin
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology and Experimental Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarh 160012, India
Virender Kumar Vinayak
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology and Experimental Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarh 160012, India
*
*Corresponding author: fax +91 172 2744401, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of the present prospective study was to detect lactose malabsorption in subjects in northern India infected with Entamoeba histolytica and passing cysts. The study group included forty-one patients with E. histolytica cysts in at least one of three consecutive faecal samples. Lactose malabsorption was detected by a lactose H2 breath test. The results were compared with those of forty controls subjects. Thirty-two of forty-one (78·0%) subjects passing E. histolytica cysts had lactose malabsorbtion compared with seventeen of forty (42·5%) control subjects (P>0·01). In conclusion, the present study shows that lactose malabsorption is significantly more common in individuals infected with E. histolytica and passing cysts compared with control subjects.

Type
Short communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Diamond, CSTechniques of axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica Schaudinn 1903 and E. histolyticalike amoebae. J Parasitol (1968) 54, 10471056.Google Scholar
Gatti, S, Petithory, JC, Ardoin, FAsymptomatic amoebic infection: Entamoeba histolytica or Entamoeba dispar. That is the question. Bull Soc Pathol Exot (2001) 94 304307.Google Scholar
Knight, RThe chemotherapy of amoebiasis. J Antimicrob Chemother (1980) 6 577579.Google Scholar
Krogstad, DJ, Spencer, Cjr & Healy, grCurrent concepts in parasitology amoebiasis. N Engl J Med (1978) 298 262265.Google Scholar
Larrosa-Haro, A, Ruiz-Perez, M & Agular-Benavides, SUtility of studying faeces for the diagnosis and management of infants and preschool children with diarrhea. Salud Publica Mex (2002) 44 328334.Google Scholar
Nanda, R, Baweja, V & Anand, BSEntamoeba histolytica cyst passers: clinical features and outcome in untreated subjects. Lancet (1984) 2 301303.Google Scholar
Newcomer, AD, McGill, DB, Thomas, PJ & Hofman, AFPerspective comparison of indirect methods for detecting lactose deficiency. N Engl J Med (1975) 293 12321236.Google Scholar
Quigley, ECurrent concepts of the irritable bowel syndrom. Scand J Gastroenterol (2003) 237 18.Google Scholar
Shetty, N, Narasimha, M, Raghuveer, TS, Elliott, E, Farthing, MJ & Macaden, RIntestinal amoebiasis and giardiasis in southern Indian infants and children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg (1990) 84 382384.Google Scholar
Vakil, BJ, Metha, AJ & Moses, JMIntestinal amoebiasis: clinical manifestations. J Assoc Phys Ind (1968) 16 285290.Google ScholarPubMed