Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:29:59.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevention of coprophagy in the rat. A new method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

B. K. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and the Animal House, Royd Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia
A. Softly
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and the Animal House, Royd Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Coprophagy in rats was prevented by the use of a leather jacket and large-mesh, screen floor cages. 2. This caused considerable depression of growth of prevented rats compared with non-prevented rats on the same diet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, R. H. & Fiala, G. (1958 a). J. Nutr. 64, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. H. & Fiala, G. (1958 b). J. Nutr. 65, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. H., Fiala, G., McGehee, B. & Brown, A. (1957). J. Nutr. 63, 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvehjem, C. A. (1948). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 7, 410.Google Scholar
Frost, D. V., Fricke, H. H. & Spruth, H. C. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. H. & Foster, C. (1942). J. Nutr. 24, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelsen, O. (1956). Vitams Horm. 14, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. B., Gregory, M. E., Kon, S. K. & Porter, J. W. G. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, M. H. (1928). J. Hyg., Camb. 27, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbock, H., Sell, M. T. & Nelson, E. M. (1923). J. biol. Chem. 55, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar