Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:50:22.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation of an experimental low-fluoride diet from single-cell organisms for rats and mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. A. Khalawan
Affiliation:
Department of Dental Anatomy, The London Hospital Medical College, Turner Street, London E1 2AD
J. C. Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Dental Anatomy, The London Hospital Medical College, Turner Street, London E1 2AD
R. W. Fearnhead
Affiliation:
Department of Dental Anatomy, The London Hospital Medical College, Turner Street, London E1 2AD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A method for producing a standard low-fluoride diet from a green alga and yeast is described. Chlorella pyrenoidosa was grown in a culture medium prepared with distilled water and analytical grade chemical salts. The spent culture medium from the alga culture was reclaimed and replenished with salts and sucrose for the production of yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

2. The single-cell organisms were separated by centrifugation from their culture media and the dried cells were blended with sucrose, maize oil, cellulose and a salt mix to produce diet pellets for rats and mice.

3. The diet was readily accepted as food by rats and mice and it was found to contain 100–300 μg fluoride/kg dry weight. Two generations of rats and four generations of mice were bred on this diet.

4. The use of hydroxyapatite to reduce the fluoride content of the chemicals used in the production of the alga and yeast biomass was investigated. Diet pellets prepared with this biomass contained 45–60 μg fluoride/kg dry weight.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

REFERENCES

Adler, P. (1970). Wld Hlth Org. Monogr. Ser. no. 59, p. 323.Google Scholar
Casey, R. P. & Lubitz, J. A. (1963). Fd Technol. 17, 48.Google Scholar
Combs, G. F. (1952). Science, N. Y. 116, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, H., Nakajima, K., Chino, R. & Shirota, M. (1974). Agric. Biol. Chem. 38, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, H. & Shirota, M. (1972). In Fermentation Technology Today, p. 533 [Tergui, G., editor]. Japan: Soc. Ferment. Technol.Google Scholar
Fogg, G. E. & Collyer, D. M. (1953). In Algal Culture: from Laboratory to Pilot Plant, p. 177 [Burlew, J. S., editor]. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Fowden, L. (1952). Biochem. J. 52, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowden, L. (1954). Ann. Botany 18, 257.Google Scholar
Harris, E. E., Hajny, G. J. & Johnson, M. C. (1951). Ind. Engng Chem. 4, 1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketchum, B. M., Lillick, L. & Redfield, A. C. (1949). J. Cell. comp. Physiol. 33, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, A. A. & Fevold, H. L. (1947). Archs Biochem. 13, 349.Google Scholar
Lindan, O. & Work, E. (1951). Biochem. J. 48, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubitz, J. A. (1963). J. Fd Sci. 28, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, H. G. & Fath, E. H. (1958). J. biol. Chem. 231, 869.Google Scholar
Milner, H. W. (1953). In Algal Culture: from Laboratory to Pilot Plant, p. 285 [Burlew, J. S., editor]. Washington D.C.: Carnegie lnstitution of Washington.Google Scholar
Murlin, J. R., Edwards, L. E. & Hawley, E. E. (1944). J. bid. Chem. 156, 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. (1947). Plant Physiol. 22, 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paschke, R. F. & Wheeler, D. H. (1954). J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 31, 81.Google Scholar
Schlenk, H., Mangold, N. K., Gellerrnan, J. L., Link, W. E., Morrissette, R. A., Holman, R. T., & Heyes, H. (1960). J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 37, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, L. & Armstrong, W. D. (1965). Analyt. Biochem. 10, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H. & Moore, S. (1958). Analyt. Chem. 30, 1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoehr, H. A. (1951). Proc. Am. Phil. SOC. 9, 62.Google Scholar
Spoehr, H. A. & Milner, H. W. (1949). Plant Physiol. 24, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volker, J. F., Hodge, H. C., Wilson, H. J. & van Voorhis, S. N. (1940). J. biol. Chem. 134, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar