Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:54:01.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photosensitization of albino rats fed on lucerne-proetin concentrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2011

Evelyn Lohrey ,
B. Tapper  and
E. L. Hove
Evelyn Lohrey
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
B. Tapper
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
E. L. Hove
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The photosensitizing effect of leaf-protein concentrate (LPC) prepared from lucerne (Medicago sativa) was demonstrated when it was included in the diet of albino rats at concentrations between 40 and 480 g/kg diet.

2. Skin lesions of varying severity up to the sloughing of ears and tails occurred when such rats were illuminated with natural daylight through window-glass or with simulated daylight from a bank of lamps having emission maxima at 410, 437 and 660 nm and with approximately 4% of the energy of summer sunlight.

3. Protein concentrates prepared from ryegrass (Lolium multiforum) and a crude chlorophyll extract of spinach (Spinacea oleracea) did not cause these effects.

4. Extracts from blood plasma and livers of rats given lucerne LPC contained pheophorbide-a and two other unidentified green pigments, but no detectable phylloerythrin or chlorophyll. Extracts from the blood of rats given ryegrass LPC had no detectable pheophorbide or other chlorophyll-derived pigments.

5. The lucerne LPC given to the rats contained relatively large amounts of pheophorbide-a among a variety of pigments. The ryegrass LPC and the spinach extracts had only small amounts of this pigment relative to the other chlorophyll-type pigments.

6. These findings indicate that pheophorbide-a and related pigments are the agents responsible for the photosensitization of the rats. Possible explanations of their presence in lucerne LPC are discussed.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , March 1974 , pp. 159 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1974

References

REFERENCES

Arkcoll, D. B. & Holden, M. (1973). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 24, 1217.Google Scholar
Bacon, M. F. (1965). J. Chromat. 17, 322.Google Scholar
Blum, H. F. (1941). Photodynamic Action and Diseases Caused by Light, New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Clare, N. T. (1944). N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol 25, 202A.Google Scholar
Clare, N. T. (1952). Photosenitization in Diseass of Domestic Animals. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Done, J., Mortimer, P. H. & Taylor, A. (1960). Res. vet. Sci. 1, 76.Google Scholar
Hove, E., Lohrey, E., Urs, M. K. & Allison, R. M. (1974). Br J. Nutr. 31, 147.Google Scholar
Perrin, D. D. (1958). Biochem. J. 68, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radeliff, R. D. (1964). Veterinary Toxicology p. 61, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. C. & Benitez, A. (1955). In Modern Methods of Plant Analysis Vol. 4, p. 142, [Paech, K. and Tracey, M. V., editors]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Strain, H. H. & Svec, W. A. (1966). In The Chlorophylls p. 54 [Vernon, L. P. and Seeley, G. R. V. editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar